Analisa Yuridis Pengesampingan Prinsip-prinsip Keadilan dan Kepatutan dalam Proses Pengambilan Keputusan oleh Arbiter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26623/humani.v11i1.2772Keywords:
arbitrase, prinsip keadilan, prinsip kepatutan, pengesampinganAbstract
Penelitian ini berfokus dalam mempelajari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 untuk mengetahui mengenai ketentuan yang memperbolehkan para pihak yang bersengketa untuk mengesampingkan prinsip-prinsip keadilan dan kepatutan dalam proses pengambilan putusan oleh arbiter. Penelitian bertujuan untuk menjawab dan mengetahui mengenai pengesampingan prinsip-prinsip keadilan dan kepatutan. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menemukan bahwa keadilan dan kepatutan (ex aequo et bono) dapat dikesampingkan sehingga arbiter tidak memiliki kebebasan untuk mengesampingkan hukum materiil, terdapat batasan mengenai pengesampingan ex aequo et bono yang telah ada dalam hukum positif dan ketentuan Pasal 56 ini tidak bertentangan dengan tujuan hukum yang utamanya adalah keadilan.References
Armour, J., & Sako, M. (2020, March). AI-enabled Business Models in Legal Services: From Traditional Law Firms to Next-generation Law Companies? Journal of Professions and Organization, 7(1), 27-46.
Berger, K. P. (2020). Adaptation of Long-Term Contracts by International Arbitrators in the Face of Severe Economic Disruptions: Three Salient Problems. Journal of International Arbitration, 37(5), 589-606.
Budidjaja, T. (2002). Public Policy as Grounds of Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Indonesia (1st ed.). Jakarta: Tatanusa.
Dawwas, A., & Kameel, T. (2020, March). Applicability of the UNIDROIT Principles as the Law Governing the Merits of Arbitration in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Arab Law Quarterly, 26(1), 1-22.
Devaney, J. (2020, February). An Independent Panel for the Scrutiny of Investment Arbitrators: an Idea Whose Time Has Come? The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 18(3), 369-388.
Dimitropoulos, G. (2020, February). Comparative and International Investment Law: Prospects for Reform An Introduction. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 21(1), 1-6.
Dumberry, P. (2020, June). The Emergence of the Concept of General Principle of International Law in Investment Arbitration Case Law? Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 11(2), 194-216.
Dunna, G. T. (2020, September). Keeping with the Times, Revisiting the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 11(3), 459-484.
Fitch, R. (1989). Commercial Arbitration in the Australian Construction Industry (1st ed.). New South Wales: Federation Press.
Gautama, S. (1989). Perkembangan Arbitrase Dagang Internasional di Indonesia (1st ed.). Bandung: PT Eresco.
Hassan, A., & Malik, D. M. (2019, Winter). Dispute Resolution Practices in USA, Australia and UK/EU. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(1), 373-379.
Maggalatung, A. S. (2014, December). Hubungan antara Fakta, Norma, Moral dan Doktrin Hukum dalam Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 2(2), 185-192.
Matser, I., Bouma, J., & Veldhuizen, E. (2020, June). No Hard Feelings? Non-succeeding Siblings and Their Perceptions of Justice in Family Firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 10(3), 1-28.
Nasution, B. J. (2011). Negara Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia (1st ed.). Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Pangaribuan, T. (2019, June). Permasalahan Penerapan Klasula Pembatasan Pertanggungjawaban dalam Perjanjian Terkait Hak Menuntut Ganti Kerugian Akibat Wanprestasi. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 49(2), 443-454.
Polonskaya, K. (2020, October). Frivolous and Abuse of Process Claims in Investor State Arbitration: Can Rules on Cost Allocation Become Solution? Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 11(3), 1-25.
Ramadhan, C. R. (2018, June). Konvergensi Civil Law dan Common Law di Indonesia dalam Penemuan dan Pembentukan Hukum. Mimbar Hukum, 30(2), 213-229.
Scheu, J., & Nikolov, P. (2020, June). The Setting Aside and Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Arbitration Awards after Achmea. Arbitration International, 36(2), 253-274.
Shahrullah, R. S. (2012, June). Modern Arbitration Legislation: A Comparison Between Australian and Indonesian Laws. Mimbar Hukum, 24(2), 189-212.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Tasrif, S. (1987). Bunga Rampai Filsafat Hukum (1st ed.). Jakarta: Abardin.
Published
Issue
Section
License
The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
