Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Aplikasi Multimedia Terbaik Menggunakan Metode AHP dan WASPAS 56 28
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26623/transformatika.v24i1.14417Kata Kunci:
AHP, WASPAS, Aplikasi Multimedia, Desain GrafisAbstrak
Pemilihan aplikasi multimedia yang tepat menjadi hal penting dalam mendukung efektivitas pekerjaan desain grafis dan pengolahan visual digital. Adobe Photoshop, CorelDraw, dan Lightroom merupakan aplikasi multimedia yang memiliki karakteristik dan keunggulan berbeda sehingga diperlukan proses pemilihan yang objektif berdasarkan beberapa kriteria penilaian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan aplikasi multimedia terbaik menggunakan pendekatan pembobotan prioritas kriteria berdasarkan tingkat kepentingannya menggunakan AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process), sedangkan perangkingan alternatif aplikasi multimedia menggunakan metode WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment). Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan pengumpulan data melalui kuesioner daring menggunakan Google Form terhadap 24 responden yang memiliki pengalaman menggunakan aplikasi multimedia. Kriteria yang digunakan meliputi kualitas hasil, fitur, performa, kemudahan penggunaan, dan kecepatan proses. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kriteria kualitas hasil memiliki bobot prioritas tertinggi sebesar 0,48532. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan metode WASPAS, Lightroom memperoleh nilai preferensi tertinggi sebesar 0,9956 sehingga direkomendasikan sebagai aplikasi multimedia terbaik, diikuti Adobe Photoshop sebesar 0,9878 dan CorelDraw sebesar 0,9636. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kombinasi metode AHP dan WASPAS mampu menghasilkan proses pengambilan keputusan yang lebih objektif, sistematis, dan terukur dalam pemilihan aplikasi multimedia.
Unduhan
Referensi
T. Vaughan, Multimedia: Making It Work. McGraw-Hill, 2011.
J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering. Academic Press, 2004.
T. Vaughan, Multimedia: Making It Work. McGraw-Hill, 2011.
R. S. Pressman, Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. McGraw-Hill, 2014.
J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering. Academic Press, 1994.
M. A. Ceisar, “Pemilihan Software Desain Grafis Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) pada Promo Copy Centre Jakarta,” Jakarta, 2019.
F. Piliang, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Perangkat Lunak Pengolah Citra dengan Metode Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) dan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” pp. 6–8, 2015.
Setiawan Adi Nugroho and Nur Wakhidah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Sosial dengan AHP dan MOORA,” Jurnal Transformatika, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 54–66, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.26623/transformatika.v23i1.12244.
D. Purnomo Putro, P. Eka Suryani, and S. Amri, “Comparative Analysis of AHP, SAW, TOPSIS, VIKOR, and MABAC in Pharmaceutical Supplier Selection,” Jurnal Transformatika, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.26623/transformatika.v23i1.12220.
Z. Fathony, E. R. S. . H. Saputra, and A. C. Frobenius, “Kombinasi Analytical Hierarchy Process dengan Weighted Product untuk Penerima Beasiswa Prestasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan,” Jurnal Transformatika, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–14, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.26623/transformatika.v21i2.6815.
A. Hallang Lewa, I. Farida, G. Taufan Hadiyadi, A. Setiawan, and A. Puji Purwatingsih, “Manajemen Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Guru Taman Kanak-Kanak dengan Simple Additive Weighting,” vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 25–34, 2024, doi: 10.26623/transformatika.v18i2.xxxx.
M. Imam, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, 3rd ed., vol. 1. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2021.
A. Ishizaka and S. Siraj, “Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 264, no. 2, pp. 462–471, 2018.
R. Kumar, S. Singh, and R. Singh, “Multi-criteria decision-making approaches for evaluating alternatives: A review,” 2021.
J. R. Evans and A. Mathur, “The value of online surveys: A look back and a look ahead,” Internet Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 854–887, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IntR-03-2018-0089.
T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008.
M. Velasquez and P. T. Hester, “An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods,” International Journal of Operations Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 56–66, 2013.
J. A. Alonso and M. T. Lamata, “Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 441–462, 2020.
S. Chakraborty and E. K. Zavadskas, “Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making,” Informatica, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2014.
E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, J. Antucheviciene, and A. Zakarevicius, “Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment,” Electronics and Electrical Engineering, vol. 122, no. 6, pp. 3–6, 2012.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Jupri, Wire Bagye, Maulana Ashari
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Transformatika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
