Comparative Analysis of AHP, SAW, TOPSIS, VIKOR, and MABAC in Pharmaceutical Supplier Selection 1653 1716
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26623/transformatika.v23i1.12220Abstract
The selection of pharmaceutical suppliers is crucial for ensuring consistent drug availability and maintaining service quality in healthcare facilities. This study offers a comparative analysis of five Multi Criteria Decision Making methods (AHP, SAW, TOPSIS, VIKOR, and MABAC) applied to supplier evaluation based on four key criteria: price, delivery time, receipt accuracy, and product quality. Unlike previous studies that employed individual or dual methods, this research evaluates all five methods using the same dataset to assess consistency, sensitivity, and decision reliability. The results show strong ranking consistency across methods, with AHP and SAW producing identical outputs. TOPSIS and VIKOR offer similar outcomes based on proximity and compromise analysis, while MABAC demonstrates high discrimination power for mid-ranked suppliers. Sensitivity tests confirm ranking stability under moderate weight variations. This study provides practical recommendations for selecting appropriate decision methods in pharmaceutical procurement systems based on operational context and desired decision accuracy.
Downloads
References
[1] E. Hares, S. S. Hilabi, and A. Hananto, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Obat Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting, J. Account. Inf. Syst., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Mar. 2023.
[2] S. Nurjanah and S. Muharni, Penerapan Metode Analyctical Hierarchy Process (AHP) untuk Pemilihan Supplier Obat, J. Inform., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 55–66, Jun. 2023.
[3] E. Susanti and R. Rusdah, Pemilihan Supplier pada Apotek Pusaka Arta dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), IDEALIS Indones. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 405–410, Feb. 2020.
[4] T. Rosyiidi and A. M. Subagyo, Analisis Pemilihan Supplier Obat pada Apotek Adinda Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Ina. J. Ind. Qual. Eng., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 21–33, Feb. 2021.
[5] H. Rofadi, F. P. Aditiawan, and R. Mumpuni, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Menggunakan Metode AHP dan SAW pada Apotek, JIFOSI J. Inform. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 02, no. 2, pp. 302–312, Mar. 2021.
[6] S. Setiawansyah, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Tempat Wisata Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS, J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 54–62, Sep. 2022.
[7] A. K. P. T. Kuning and N. Ananda, Pemilihan Jasa Ekspedisi pada Perusahaan Farmasi dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Pros. Semin. Nas. Manaj. Ind. dan Rantai Pasok, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 122–128, 2020.
[8] D. Guswandi, S. Wahyuni, M.Hafizh, T. Novita, and H. Syahputra, Analisis Penentuan Supplier Bahan Baku Mebel Terbaik Menggunakan Metode VIKOR, J. KomtekInfo, vol. 9, pp. 146–153, Dec. 2022.
[9] N. A. U. N. Muljadi, W. Widekso, and W. T. Atmojo, Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan TOPSIS dengan VIKOR dalam Pemilihan Hubungan Kerjasama, Techno.Com, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 224–236, May 2022.
[10] D. P. Indini and M. Reinaldi, Implementasi Metode MABAC dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Lokasi Instalasi WI-FI Publik Oleh Dinas KominfoStan Kabupaten Deli Serdang, J. Kaji. Ilm. Teknol. Inf. dan Komput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–15, Dec. 2022.
[11] S. N. B. Sapira, A. F. Sari, E. A. A. Dewi, and A. P. Ristadi Pinem, Penerapan Metode MABAC dalam Rekomendasi Platform Investasi Emas Online Terbaik, JIPI (Jurnal Ilm. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran Inform., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1198–1211, Aug. 2024.
[12] D. P. A. Hidayat, Analisis Penerapan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam Penentuan Daerah Tangkapan Air di Sub DAS Cisadane Hulu, J. Rekayasa Konstr. Mek. Sipil, vol. 03, no. 02, pp. 81–87, Sep. 2020.
[13] M. Y. Haffandi and B. Hendrik, Analisa Metode Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Konteks Perusahaan: Systematic Literature Review, J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 6463–6471, Dec. 2024.
[14] R. L. Simanjuntak, T. R. Siagian, and V. Anggriani, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode Topsis Dalam Pemilihan Smartphone Android, J. Ilm. Komputasi, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 405–412, Sep. 2024.
[15] A. D. Wahyudi and A. R. Isnain, Penerapan Metode TOPSIS untuk Pemilihan Distributor Terbaik, J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 59–70, Jun. 2023.
[16] M. Solikin, P. E. Suryani, and D. P. Putro, Komparasi Metode MAUT, WASPAS, MOORA, Fuzzy AHP, TOPSIS dalam Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa, Inf. Sci. Libr., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2025.
[17] Handayani Metha Putri, Penerapan Metode VIKOR dalam Pemilihan Penyedia Barang / Jasa, BRAHMANA J. Penerapan Kecerdasan Buatan Terakreditasi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2023.
[18] U. I. Arsyah, A. R. Nasution, M. Sweety, and M. J. Toar, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Bayi Gizi Baik dan Buruk Metode VIKOR, Sist. Pendukung Keputusan dengan Apl., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–45, Mar. 2023.
[19] Wijaya Kusman Batee, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Bahan Baku Kayu Terbaik Untuk Kitchen Set Dapur Minimalis Menerapkan Metode MABAC, J. Informatics, Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 99–106, Mar. 2023.
[20] A. P. Simaremare, Penerapan Metode MABAC Pada Penerimaan Ahli Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3), Resolusi Rekayasa Tek. Inform. dan Inf., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 209–220, 2021.
[21] A. Muiz, A. Suryadi, and M. Ramdani, Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Penunjang Keputusan Penilaian Karyawan Berprestasi Berbasis Website Dengan Metode MABAC (Studi Kasus: PT. Flexo Solusi Indonesia), J. Ekon. Manaj. Sist. Inf., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1714–1727, Feb. 2025.
[22] A. Sulistiyawati, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Berbasis Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison dan Entropy Weighting untuk Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi di Sekolah Menengah Atas, J. Pendidik. dan Teknol. Indones., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 451–463, Feb. 2025.
[23] A. N. Shabrina, N. Nurfadilla, and D. R. Ramadhani, Implementasi Analytic Hierarchy Process dalam Penentuan Supplier pada Toko Obat Shafira, MALCOM Indones. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–46, Apr. 2022.
[24] W. Yusnaeni, M. Marlina, R. Y. Hayuningtyas, and R. Sari, Comparison AHP-MABAC And Waspas Methods For Supplier Recommendations, J. Tek. Komput., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 145–150, Jul. 2021.
[25] Kadek Indah Permataa, Desy Purnami Singgih Putria, and Gusti Made Arya Sasmitab, Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Web-Based Credit Approval: A Study of TOPSIS, MABAC, WASPAS, and MAUT Methods, J. Penelit. Teknol. Inf. dan Sains, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 114–130, Mar. 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dwi Purnomo Putro, Puput Eka Suryani, Saeful Amri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Transformatika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
