The Role of Work-Life Balance and Meaningful Work on Intention to Stay with Career Adaptability as a Mediator
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26623/philanthropy.v10i1.14233Keywords:
work-life balance, meaningful work, career adaptability, intention to stayAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of work-life balance and meaningful work on intention to stay, with career adaptability as a mediating variable. The study used a quantitative approach with a survey method of 250 service sector employees in Indonesia. The data analysis technique used Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The results showed that work-life balance and meaningful work had a positive and significant effect on career adaptability and intention to stay. β = 0.25 (WLB → ITS) β = 0.30 (MW → ITS) β = 0.40 (WLB → CA) β = 0.35 (MW → CA) In addition, career adaptability also has a significant effect on intention to stay β = 0.28 CA → ITS and it is proven that career adaptability mediates work-life balance on intention to stay β indirect = 0.40 × 0.28 = 0.112 (WLB → CA → ITS) and meaningful work on intention to stay β indirect = 0.35 × 0.28 = 0.098 MW → CA → ITS The coefficient of determination (R² = 0.71) shows that the model has strong explanatory power, while the predictive relevance value (Q² > 0) indicates the model has good predictive ability. This finding confirms that work-life balance and job meaning are important factors in increasing employee retention by strengthening career adaptability.
References
Allan, B. A., Batz-Barbarich, C., Sterling, H. M., & Tay, L. (2020). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta-analysis. Journal Of Management Studies. 57(6), 1139-1179 https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12585
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Blau, P.M. (1964), Justice in Social Exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34: 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x
Chang, H. P., Hsieh, C. M., Lan, M. Y., & Chen, H. S. (2019). Examining the moderating effects of work–life balance between human resource practices and intention to stay. Sustainability, 11(17), 4585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174585
Coetzee, M., & Harry, N. (2021). Gender differences in career adaptability and employability attributes among young adults in the postmodern world of work. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 47, a1846. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1846
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
Duffy, R. D., Allan, B. A., Autin, K. L., & Bott, E. M. (2021). Calling and meaningful work. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000521
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
Gallup. (2023). State of the Global Workplace 2023 Report. Washington, DC: Gallup.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 165–183). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1chs29w.14
Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2020). Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010
Hancock, J. I., Allen, D. G., Bosco, F. A., McDaniel, K. R., & Pierce, C. A. (2013). Meta-analytic review of employee turnover as a predictor of firm performance. Journal of Management, 39(3), 573–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311424943
Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D., & Hausknecht, J. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000103
JobStreet. (2023, 28 Februari). Job Hopping: Memahami Dampak Jadi Kutu Loncat di Dunia Kerja. JobStreet Indonesia Career Advice. Diakses pada 2 Maret 2026, dari JobStreet Indonesia.
Kossek, E. E., Valcour, M., & Lirio, P. (2014). The sustainable workforce: Organizational strategies for promoting work-life balance and well-being. In C. L. Cooper & P. Y. Chen (Eds.), Wellbeing: A Complete Reference Guide, Volume III: Work and Wellbeing (pp. 295–318). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell018
LinkedIn. (2023). The future of recruiting: Southeast Asia edition. LinkedIn Talent Solutions. https://business.linkedin.com/content/dam/me/business/en-us/talent-solutions/resources/pdfs/future-of-recruiting-2023-seasia.pdf.
Lysova, E. I., Allan, B. A., Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D., & Steger, M. F. (2021). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110(Part B), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.07.004
Microsoft. (2022). Work Trend Index: Great Expectations – Making Hybrid Work Work. Microsoft Corporation
Ngo, H. Y., Liu, X. Y., & Cheung, F. Y. L. (2022). Perceived employability and career outcomes: The role of career adaptability and job insecurity. Human Resource Management, 61(4), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22052
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2023). Global Workforce Hopes and Fears Survey 2023. London: PricewaterhouseCoopers
Rudolph, C. W., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2021). Career adaptability: A meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 124, 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103502
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Samroodh, M., Anwar, I., Ahmad, A., Akhtar, S., Bino, E., & Ali, M. A. (2023). The indirect effect of job resources on employees’ intention to stay: A serial mediation model with psychological capital and work–life balance as the mediators. Sustainability, 15(1), 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010551
Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011
Silaban, H., Margaretha, M., & Obrenovic, B. (2021). The impact of work-life balance toward job satisfaction and employee retention: Study of millennial employees in Bandung City, Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 7(3), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.73.2002
Sofia, I. N., & Walyoto. (2021). The effect of work-life balance on intention to stay mediated by psychological empowerment. Journal of Management and Islamic Finance, 1(1), 1–15.
Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Agung Santoso Pribadi, Erna Setijaningrum, Mohammad Fakhruddin Mudzakir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author who will publish the manuscript at Philanthropy: Journal of Psychology, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
