Perbandingan LSTM dengan Support Vector Machine dan Multinomial Na ve Bayes pada Klasifikasi Kategori Hoax

Authors

  • Puji Winar Cahyo Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta
  • Ulfi Saidata Aesyi Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26623/transformatika.v20i2.5880

Keywords:

svm, lstm, multinomial na ve bayes, klasifikasi, deep learning

Abstract

Hoax is fake news, now massively spread through social media. The impact of hoaxes is that people's misperceptions in understanding of news are very high. With the existence of hoaxes are spreading through social media, it requires the public to think smart when receiving the news. Currently, many ways to prevent hoaxes, right now we have Fact Checker Directory Platform which is a truth platform sourced from several fact check sites. On the truth check platform, every news detected as hoaxes has been categorized into specific type of hoax, manually by the validator. For this reason, this research attempts to automatically categorize the types of hoaxes using comparation of Deep Learning with Machine Learning classifications. Deep Learning uses Long Short Term Memory Network (LSTM), while Machine Learning uses Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Multinomial Naive Bayes. Through the build model process, SVM produces the best accuracy quality of 0.74, Multinomial Na ve Bayes produces an accuracy quality of 0.62 while LSTM displays 0.49. The results of low accuracy in LSTM need to be evaluated on model architecture and data normalization during preprocessing.

Author Biographies

  • Puji Winar Cahyo, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta
    Informatics
  • Ulfi Saidata Aesyi, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta
    Information System

References

M. Iqbal, “Efektifitas Hukum Dan Upaya Menangkal Hoax sebagai Konsekuensi Negatif Perkembangan Interkasi Manusia,” Literasi Huk., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2019.

N. Histimuna Aisyah, “Mahasiswa Cerdas Tangkal Berita Hoaks di Era Disrupsi Melalui Literasi Digital,” J. Keislam. dan Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–82, 2021.

P. W. Cahyo and A. Ulfi Saidata, “Analisis Eksploratif Berita Hoax pada Situs Cek Kebenaran,” J. Inform. Univ. Pamulang, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 313–320, 2022.

I. M. Solichin, B. N. Jati, F. Ghalib, N. A. Rakhmawati, and A. M. P. Kualitatif, “Analisis Kewaspadaan dan Respon Orang Dewasa terhadap Hoax,” J. Inf. Eng. Educ. Technol., vol. 06, no. 2, pp. 33–36, 2022.

A. Afriza and J. Adisantoso, “Metode Klasifikasi Rocchio untuk Analisis Hoax Rocchio Classification Method for Hoax Analysis,” J. Ilmu Komput. dan Agri-informatika, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2018.

P. N. Anggreyani and W. Maharani, “Hoax Detection Tweets of the COVID-19 on Twitter Using LSTM- CNN with Word2Vec,” vol. 6, pp. 2432–2437, 2022.

P. W. Cahyo, K. Kusumaningtyas, and U. S. Aesyi, “A User Recommendation Model for Answering Questions on Brainly Platform,” J. INFOTEL, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2021.

P. W. Cahyo, M. Habibi, A. Priadana, and A. B. Saputra, “Analysis of Popular Hashtags on Instagram Account The Ministry of Health,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Health and Medical Sciences (AHMS 2020), 2021, vol. 34, no. Ahms 2020, pp. 270–273.

M. Habibi and P. W. Cahyo, “Journal Classification Based on Abstract Using Cosine Similarity and Support Vector Machine,” JISKa, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 185–192, 2020.

Y. Hacohen-kerner, D. Miller, and Y. Yigal, “The influence of preprocessing on text classification using a bag-of-words representation,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1–22, 2020.

P. W. Cahyo and M. Habibi, “Entity Profiling to Identify Actor Involvement in Topics of Social Media Content,” IJCCS (Indonesian J. Comput. Cybern. Syst., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 417–428, 2020.

A. Yadav, C. K. Jha, and A. Sharan, “Optimizing LSTM for time series prediction in Indian stock market,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 167, pp. 2091–2100, 2020.

A. Khumaidi, R. Raafi, and I. P. Solihin, “Pengujian Algoritma Long Short Term Memory untuk Prediksi Kualitas Udara dan Suhu Kota Bandung,” J. Telemat., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2020.

S. Dobilas, “LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks — How to Teach a Network to Remember the Past,” towardsdatascience.com, 2022.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-01-20

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023): January

Section

Artikel

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Creative Commons License
Transformatika is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.