ANALISIS PENGARUH NON PERFORMING LOAN (NPL), RETURN ON ASSET (ROA), RETURN ON EQUITY (ROE) TERHADAP RISIKO LIKUIDITAS PERBANKAN
Abstract
Abstrak
Pada ekonomi di sebuah negara, perbankan punya andil besar. Perbankan berperan penting didalam peminjaman di wilayah publik dan swasta. Fungsi perbankan sebagai perantara, yang mana bank bermanfaat sebagai perantara diantara pihak-pihak yang berkecukupan ke mereka yang membutuhkan. Riset ini bertitik berat di bidang yang berpengaruh pada risiko likuiditas di bank. Maksud dari riset ini tidak lain buat analisis efek NPL, ROA serta ROE kepada resiko likuiditas perbankan listing di BEI rentang 2016-2019.
Sampel yang dipergunakan didalam riset semua perbankan, baik itu milik pemerintah (BUMN) ataupun Bank Swasta Nasional di Indonesia yang diakui di BI sejak 2016 sampai 2019. Dari kriteria tersebut didapat 40 bank, metode yang dipakai adalah purposive sampling. Metode analisis riset ini adalah regresi linier, untuk diuji buat melewati asumsi klasik dengan normalitas, multicollinearity, autocorrelation dan heteroscedasticity.
Hasil riset memperlihatkan kalau variabel ROA dan ROE memiliki efek bagus dan signifikan kepada risiko likuiditas. Sedang variabel NPL memiliki efek buruk dan tidak signifikan kepada risiko likuiditas.
Kata Kunci: NPL, ROA, ROE, Risiko Likuiditas.
ABSTRACT
In the economy in a country, banking has a great contribution. Banks have contributed to the distribution of credit in the public and private sector. Banking function as a liaison, where the bank is useful as a liaison to the parties who are excessive for those in need. This research focuses on areas that affect liquidity risk in banks. The benefit of this research is to analyze the effect of NPL, ROA and ROE on liquidity risk in banks listed on the IDX for the 2016-2019 period.
The sample used in the research is all banks, both owned by the government (BUMN) and National Private Banks in Indonesia which have been recognized at BI from 2016 to 2019. From these criteria found 40 banks, the method used is purposive sampling. The analytical method used in this study is linear regression, which is tested using classical assumptions using normality, multicollinearity, autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity.
The research results show that the ROA and ROE variables have a good and significant effect on liquidity risk. While the NPL variables have a negative and insignificant effect on liquidity risk.
Keywords: NPL, ROA, ROE, liquidity risk.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul-Rahman, A.et al (2018). Does financing structure affects bank liquidity risk? Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 52(August 2016), 26 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.04.004
Khan, A. Q and Abdullah, A., (2012). Liquidity Risk Management: A Comparative Study between Domestic and Foreign Banks in Pakistan. Journal of Managerial Sciences., 6(1), 61 72. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Liquidity-Risk-Management-%3A-A-Comparative-Study-and-Abdullah-Khan/63339eb3110d9192f86621245fbcdcd9f01fef7f
Ali, Masyhud. 2006. Manajemen Risiko : Strategi Perbankan dan Dunia Usaha Menghadapi tantangan globalisasi bisnis. Jakarta :PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Antariksa, R. (2006). Pengaruh Risiko Likuiditas Terhadap Profitabilitas (Studi Kasus pada PT. Bak Muamalat Indonesia). Eksis, 2(2), 109390.
Muharam, H. dan Azhary, A. (2017). Analisis Faktor Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Risiko Likuiditas pada Bank Konvensional,vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65 77.
Yaya, R. dan Bani, F., (2016). Risiko Likuiditas pada Perbankan Konvensional dan Syariah di Indonesia, 16(1), 1 26.
Bouwman, C. H and Berger, A. N.,(2005). Bank capital , risk and liquidity creation. no. June, p. 43, 2005.
Budisantoso dkk (2015). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lain. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Dendawijaya, Lukman.2005. Manajemen Perbankan. Bogor : Ghalia Indonesia.
Disman, D. and Effendi, K. A. (2017). Liquidity risk: Comparison between Islamic and conventional banking. European Research Studies Journal, 20(2), 308 318.
Ghozali, Imam. 2018. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 24 8 ed. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Undip.
Ikatan Bankir Indonesia (IBI). 2015. Manajemen Risiko 2 Modul Sertifikasi Manajemen Risiko Tingkat II. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Iqbal, A. (2016). Liquidity Risk Management : A Comparative study betwen conventional and islamic banks of Pakistan. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(5), 54 64. https://doi.org/Online ISSN: 2249-4588 & Print ISSN: 0975-5853
Jaara, O. O.et al(2017). Liquidity Risk Exposure in Islamic and Conventional Banks, 7(6), 16 26.
Kasmir. 2010. Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya Ed. Revisi. Jakarta : Rajawali pers.
Management, L. R., Study, C., & Banks, C. (2015). Arabian Journal of Business and Liquidity Risk Management : A Comparative Study between Islamic and Conventional Banks, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.4172/2223-5833.1000166
Management, R., Islamic, F., Emirates, U. A., Islamic, D., Act, B. C., & Islamic, B. (2008). Liquidity Risk Management : a Comparative Study Between Conventional and Islamic, 5(January), 35 44.
Prasetiono, P. and Mirajudin, M.,(2017). Analisis Liquidity Creation Pada Perbankan Di Indonesia Tahun 2007-2013 (Studi Kasus Pada 10 Bank Besar Di Indonesia Tahun 2013). Jurnal Studi Manajemen Organisasi, 12(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.14710/jsmo.v12i1.13424
Kurnia, H. P and Muharam, H.(2016). Liquidity Risk on Banking Industry: Comparative Study Between Islamic Bank and Conventional Bank in Indonesia. Al-Iqtishad: Journal of Islamic Economics, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v5i2.2565
Meerajancy, J. and Nishanthini, A.(2015). Trade-Off between Liquidity and Profitability : A Comparative Study between State Banks and Private Banks in Sri Lanka. Research of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(7), 78 86.
Alam, W. F. I. dan Nugraheni, P.,(2014). Pengaruh Risiko Likuiditas Terhadap Profitabilitas Pada Perbankan Syariah dan Konvensional di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Penanaman Modal, 15(174), 1 16. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.1995.525848
Pandia, Frianto. 2012. Manajemen Dana dan Kesehatan Bank. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Pardede, Marulak. 1998. Likuidasi Bank dan Perlindungan Nasabah. Jakarta : Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Prochnow,H. V. (1949). Bank Liquidity and the New Doctrine of Anticipated Income.J. Finance, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 298 314, 1949.
Banna, S. H. and Rahman, M. L.(2016). Liquidity Risk Management: A Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Banks in Bangladesh. Journal of Business and Technology (Dhaka), 10(2), 18 35. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbt.v10i2.29465
Rattan, G. K. et al2016). Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies ISSN:, 4(2), 35 41.
Å argu, A. C. and Roman, A.(2014). Banks Liquidity Risk Analysis in the New European Union Member Countries: Evidence from Bulgaria and Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15(14), 569 576. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00512-7
Scannella,E. (2016). Theory and regulation of liquidity risk management in banking. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manag., vol. 19, no. 1/2, p. 4, 2016.
Silberston, A. (2017). Economies of Scale in Theory and Practice Author ( s ): Aubrey Silberston Source : The Economic Journal , Vol . 82 , No . 325 , Special Issue : In Honour of E . A . G . Robinson Published by : Wiley on behalf of the Royal Economic Society Stable URL : htt, Econ. J., vol. 82, no. 325, pp. 369 391, 2017.
Suryaningtyas, S. and Sukmana, R.(2016). Determinants of Liquidity Risk in Indonesian Islamic and Conventional Banks: A Panel Regression. Al-Iqtishad: Journal of Islamic Economics, 8(2), 187 200. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v8i2.2871
Sunaryo,T.2007. Manajemen Risiko Financial. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Taswan. 2006. Manajemen Perbankan Konsep Teknik dan Aplikasinya. Yogyakarta : UPP STIM YKPN.
www.bi.go.id diakses Desember 2018.
www.idx.co.id diakses Januari 2019.
Database Bloomberg, diakses Januari 2019
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/slsi.v19i3.4112
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
View My Stats SOLUSI is an scientific magazine is a collection of quality scientific journals from various social science disciplines including economics, accounting, management and business, Universitas Semarang (Central Java, Indonesia). It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
