Pidana Pengawasan dalam KUHP Nasional Sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan Berbasis Keadilan Restoratif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v9i2.14027Keywords:
Alternatif Pemidanaan, Keadilan Restoratif, Pidana PengawasanAbstract
This study aims to analyze the integration of restorative justice within the Indonesian sentencing system and to examine supervisory punishment as an alternative sentencing mechanism under the National Criminal Code. This research employs normative legal methods using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that before the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023, restorative justice had been accommodated in various sectoral regulations, yet remained partial and lacked systemic integration. The National Criminal Code subsequently institutionalizes supervisory punishment as a non-custodial sanction reflecting a paradigm shift from retributive to restorative justice, emphasizing victim recovery, offender accountability, and social reintegration. The novelty of this study lies in its comprehensive analysis linking the pre-Criminal Code development of restorative justice with the formulation of supervisory punishment as a concrete instrument for its implementation within the national sentencing system. Therefore, supervisory punishment has strategic implications in promoting a more humane, proportional, and recovery-oriented criminal justice system.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis integrasi keadilan restoratif dalam sistem pemidanaan di Indonesia serta mengkaji pidana pengawasan sebagai alternatif pemidanaan dalam KUHP Nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebelum berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023, konsep keadilan restoratif telah diakomodasi dalam berbagai regulasi sektoral, namun masih bersifat parsial dan belum terintegrasi secara sistemik. KUHP Nasional kemudian menginstitusionalisasikan pidana pengawasan sebagai bentuk pemidanaan non-pemenjaraan yang mencerminkan pergeseran paradigma dari retributif menuju restoratif, dengan menekankan pemulihan korban, tanggung jawab pelaku, dan reintegrasi sosial. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis komprehensif yang menghubungkan perkembangan keadilan restoratif pra-KUHP dengan formulasi pidana pengawasan sebagai instrumen konkret implementasi keadilan restoratif dalam sistem pemidanaan nasional. Dengan demikian, pidana pengawasan berimplikasi strategis dalam mewujudkan sistem pemidanaan yang lebih humanis, proporsional, dan berorientasi pada pemulihan sosial.
References
Adrianto, Iwan. “Konsep Penerapan Restoratif Justice Oleh Penyidik Kepolisian Dalam Pasal Pasal KUHP Baru.” Janaloka 2, no. 2 (2023). https://janalokajournal.id/index.php/jnk/article/view/44.
Afifah Firdaus and Indra Yugha Koswara. “Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia: Analisis Tentang Pidana Pengawasan Dan Asas Keseimbangan.” Lex Renaissance 9, no. 1 (June 2024): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol9.iss1.art1.
Akbar, Muhammad Fatahillah. “Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 51, no. 2 (April 2022): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.199-208.
Alfies, L. Alfies Sihombing, Yeni Nuraeni, Komarudin Komarudin, and Karunia Karunia. “Restorative justice as a New Breakthrough to Reduce Recidivism and Promote Reform in the Criminal Law System.” Jurnal USM Law Review 8, no. 1 (April 2025): 441–53. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i1.11807.
Arafat, Muhammad. “Paradigma Pemidanaan Baru Dalam KUHP 2023: Alternatif Sanksi Dan Transformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (September 2025): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.58540/jih.v2i1.1047.
Banwell-Moore, Rebecca. “Restorative justice: Adopting a Whole System Approach to Address Cultural Barriers in Criminal Justice.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 24, no. 5 (November 2024): 1028–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958241268005.
Btr, Teriyanti, Arika Palapa, and Iksan Saifudin. “Pidana Pengawasan Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Syntax Idea 6, no. 7 (July 2024): 3131–44. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i7.4069.
Crawford, Allison D., Haley Zettler, Stacy Braddy, Matt Hayward, Rebecca Howe, Jennifer Rowe, and Jacqueline M. McGrath. “Community Supervision Engagement to Examine Health Outcomes: A Scoping Review.” Public Health Nursing 42, no. 5 (September 2025): 1746–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13577.
Hansen, Toran, and Mark Umbreit. “State of Knowledge: Four Decades of Victim‐offender Mediation Research and Practice: The Evidence.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 36, no. 2 (December 2018): 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21234.
Hikmawati, Puteri. Pidana Pengawasan Sebagai Pengganti Pidana Bersyarat Menuju Keadilan Restoratif (Criminal Conditional Supervision As A Substitute for a Probation Sentence Towards Restorative Justice). 7, no. 1 (2016). https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/923.
Hutauruk, Rufinus Hotmaulana. Penanggulangan Kejahatan Korporasi Melalui Pendekatan Restoratif Suatu Terobosan Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
Karjono, Arpandi, Parningotan Malau, and Ciptono Ciptono. “Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Justice Dalam Hukum Pidana Berbasis Kearifan Lokal.” Jurnal USM Law Review 7, no. 2 (July 2024): 1035–50. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9571.
Kirkwood, Steve. “A Practice Framework for Restorative Justice.” Aggression and Violent Behavior 63 (March 2022): 101688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101688.
Nababan, Johana, and Darmadi, A.A. Ngurah Oka Yudhistira. “Analisis Perbandingan Pidana Bersyarat Dan Pidana Pengawasan.” Jurnal Media Akademik 3, no. 10 (2025).
Nawawi Arief, Barda. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana : Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
———. RUU KUHP Baru Sebuah Restrukturisasi/Rekonstruksi Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Semarang, Indonesia: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2012.
———. Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan : Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Dan Perbandingan Beberapa Negara. Semarang, Indonesia: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2009.
Nugraha, Roby Satya, Edi Rohaedi, Nandang Kusnadi, and Abid Abid. “The Transformation of Indonesia’s Criminal Law System: Comprehensive Comparison between the Old and New Penal Codes.” Reformasi Hukum 29, no. 1 (April 2025): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v29i1.1169.
Priyatno, Dwidja. Bunga Rampai Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2018.
Sagalane, Andra Bani, Yekti Handayani, and STIH Manokowari. Eksistensi Restorative justice dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. n.d. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.492.
Sujatmiko, Bagus, and Milda Istiqomah. “Mendorong Penerapan Pidana Bersyarat Pasca Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum Nomor 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 Sebagai Alternatif Keadilan Restoratif.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 7, no. 1 (September 2022): 46–62. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i1.787.
Sutanti, Rahmi, Pujiyono Pujiyono, and Nur Rochaeti. “The Urgency of Implementing Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture in Combating Green Financial Crimes in Indonesia.” Paper presented at Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Law, Economics and Governance, IWLEG 2022, 27 July 2022, Semarang, Indonesia, Semarang, Indonesia. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Law, Economics and Governance, IWLEG 2022, 27 July 2022, Semarang, Indonesia, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-7-2022.2326300.
Syah, Benny Elfian, and Didik Endro Purwoleksono. “Ius Constituendum Restorative justice in Indonesia.” Media Iuris 6, no. 3 (October 2023): 365–78. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v6i3.44405.
Syahputra, Andrian Eka, Mukidi Mukidi, and Adil Akhya. “Kebijakan Hukum Penerapan Restoratif Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Narkotika Berdasarkan Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penanganan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (Studi Di Direktorat.” Jurnal Ilmiah Metadata 6, no. 2 (May 2024): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v6i2.492.
Tiawarman, Andriansyah. “Reformasi Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia melalui Restorative Justice untuk Pemulihan Korban dan Pelaku.” Jurnal Retentum 7, no. 1 (2025): 358–69.
Wahid, Abdul. “Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 7, no. 2 (October 2022): 307–21. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i2.5793.
Wicaksana, Villar Wibawa and Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah. “Kebijakan Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Tentang Pidana Kerja Sosial Dalam KUHP Nasional : Perspektif Tujuan Pemidanaan.” Jurnal USM Law Review 8, no. 2 (May 2025): 709–28. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.11092.
Wodahl, Eric J., Kimberly Schweitzer, and Cary Heck. “Carrot or Stick? The Efficacy of Incentives and Sanctions for Improving Probation Supervision Outcomes.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 51, no. 12 (December 2024): 1820–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241275626.
Wood, William, Masahiro Suzuki, and Hennessey Hayes. “Restorative justice in Youth and Adult Criminal Justice.” SSRN Electronic Journal, ahead of print, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4223856.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.


Citedness in Scopus 

