Enhancing Professional Skepticism and Audit Decisions: A Scientometric View 28 21
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26623/ebsj.v10i2.16161Keywords:
professional scepticism, audit decisions, VOSViewer analysisAbstract
This study aims to examine the direction of studies concerning the relationship between professional scepticism and audit decisions. The method used in this research was viewer analysis and also the PRISMA method approach, with 54 years of observation from 1970 to 2024. Of the 980 articles obtained, only 34 eligible articles were published. The research results showed that the article written by Quadackers et al., (2014) was ranked 1st as the most cited article, with 270 citations. The method most widely used with this research theme is the experimental method. Furthermore, the navigation between professional scepticism and audit decisions in the analysis of bibliometrics in cluster 1 is dominated by the keywords of auditor judgment, sceptical judgment, literature and accounting estimate. This study is the first to investigate enhancing relationship between professional skepticism and audit decisions using bibliometrics analysis and a literature review. This study focuses on articles published between 1970 to 2024. This study is important because it connects previous and more recent studies, identifies gaps in understanding, and suggests new ways to study relationship between professional skepticism and audit decisions. The material used in this study was only taken from the Scopus database. Therefore, further research needs to be done by including indexing and other databases.
References
Aburisheh, K., Owais, W., Al-dahiyat, A., Bawaneh, A., & Alqudah, L. (2023). Mapping and visualisation of audit quality research trends. Int. J. Economics and Business Research, 25(1), 29–49. https://www.inderscience.com/jhome.php?jcode=ijebr
Agustí, M. A., & Perez, M. (2022). Big data and artificial intelligence in the fields of accounting and auditing: A Bibliometric analysis. REFC-Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 1–36. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4155537
Agustin, R. (2020). Professional skepticism and the ability of auditor in assessing audit risk. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2), 5479–5483.
Al Husaeni, D. F., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2022). Bibliometric using Vosviewer with Publish or Perish (using Google Scholar data): from step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of digital learning articles in pre and post Covid-19 pandemic. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v2i1.37368
Alberti, C. T., Bedard, J. C., Bik, O., & Vanstraelen, A. (2022). Audit Firm Culture: Recent Developments and Trends in the Literature. European Accounting Review, 31(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1846574
Andiola, L. M., Lambert, T. A., & Lynch, E. J. (2018). Sprandel, Inc.: electronic workpapers,audit documentation , and closing review notes in the audit of accounts receivable. Issues in Accounting Education, 33(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-52055
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2012). Auditing and Assurance Services: an Integrated Approach (Fourteeth). Prentice Hall.
Ashton, R. H., & Willingham, J. J. (1988). Using and evaluating audit decision aids. Audit Symposium IX: Proceedings of the 1988 Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Procedures, 1–25.
Bazerman, M. H. (2001). The study of ‘real’ decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14(5), 353–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.382
Boland, C. M., Daugherty, B. E., & Dickins, D. (2019). Evidence of the relationship between PCAOB inspection outcomes and the use of structured audit technologies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(2), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52214
Bonner, S. E. (1999). Judgment and decision-making research in accounting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.385
Bourgeois-Gironde, S. (2020). The mind under the axioms: decision-theory beyond revealed preferences (M. Altman (ed.)). academic press: imprint of Elsevier.
Brown, J. O., & Millar, M. (2023). A Matter of perspective: mitigating the outcome effect in auditor performance evaluations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 42(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2020-146
Ciger, A. (2020). Audit quality: A Bibliometric analysis (1981-2020). Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 67(4), 473–494. https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2020-0031
Contreras, A. G., & Angulo, J. A. G. (2005). Audit report and risk analysts’ behavior: The beliefs’ revision model. Revista Espanola de Financiacion y Contabilidad, 34(125), 501–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2005.10779554
Crucean, A. C. (2021). A Bibliometric Analysis of the Audit Quality at Global Level. AMIS - Accounting and Management Information Systems, June 9-10, 1–16. https://amis.ase.ro/2021/docs/AMIS2021Proceedings.pdf#page=316
Darsono, D., Chariri, A., & Januarti, I. (2023). Does profiling fraudsters increase auditor’s professional skepticism? (empirical evidence of the narcissistic profiles). Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Management, Business and Economics Conference (AMBEC 2021), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-026-8
Deliu, D. (2021). Elevating professional reasoning in auditing. Psycho-professional factors affecting auditor’s professional judgement and skepticism. Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research & Practice, 2020, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5171/2020.804680
Dimitrova, J., & Sorova, A. (2016). The Role of professional skepticism in financial statement audit and its appropriate application. Journal of Economics, 1(2), 1–17.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(April), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Durkin, M. P., Rose, J. M., & Thibodeau, J. C. (2020). Can simple metaphors be used as decision aids to promote professional skepticism? Journal of Information Systems, 34(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-52380
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision Theory: processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53–88. www.annualreviews.org
Fachriaz, N. S., & Saifudin, S. (2026). Cyber Security Audit in Information Technology Governance : A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Jurnal Transformatika, 23(2), 135–154.
Farag, M. S., & Elias, R. Z. (2012). The impact of accounting students’ professional skepticism on their ethical perception of earnings management. In Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting (Vol. 16, pp. 185–200). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1574-0765(2012)0000016010
Felix, W. L. (1974). Decision Theory View of Auditing. Contemporary Auditing Problems: Proceedings of the Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems, 63–71.
Garcia, I. (2020). e-Leadership: A Bibliometric analysis. International Journal: Advanced Corporate Learning, 1, 19–34.
Ghozali, I. (2020). 25 Grand theory: teori besar ilmu manajemen,akuntansi dan bisnis. Yoga Pratama Semarang.
Goddard, F., & Schmidt, M. (2020). Attributes influencing clients’ auditor choices: The expectation gaps between auditors and board members. Current Issues in Auditing, 14(2), A1–A14. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-19-026
Gong, Y. F., Kim, S., & Harding, N. (2014). Elevating professional skepticism an exploratory study into the impact of accountability pressure and knowledge of the superior’s preferences. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(8), 674–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2013-0914
Gramling, A. A. (1999). External auditors’ reliance on work performed by internal auditors: the influence of fee pressure on this reliance decision. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(Supplement).
Griffith, E. E., Hammersley, J. S., Kadous, K., & Young, D. (2015). Auditor mindsets and audits of complex estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(1), 49–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12066
Griffith, E. E., Kadous, K., & Young, D. (2016). How insights from the “New” JDM research can improve auditor judgment: Fundamental research questions and methodological advice. Auditing, 35(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51347
Guiral, A., & Esteo, F. (2006). Are Spanish auditors skeptical in going concern evaluations? Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(6), 598–620. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610674889
Guiral, A., Rodgers, W., Ruiz, E., & Gonzalo-Angulo, J. A. (2015). Can expertise mitigate auditors’ unintentional biases? Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.11.002
Guiral, A., Ruiz, E., & Choi, H. J. (2014). Audit report information content and the provision of non-audit services: Evidence from Spanish lending decisions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.01.001
Gurevich, G., Kliger, D., & Levy, O. (2009). Decision-making under uncertainty - A field study of cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(7), 1221–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.12.017
Habib, A., Bhuiyan, M. B. U., & Sun, X. (Sean). (2019). Audit partner busyness and cost of equity capital. International Journal of Auditing, 23(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12144
Hai, P. T., Toanc, L. D., Le Dinh Quy, N., & Tung, N. T. (2020). Research factors affecting professional skepticism and audit quality: Evidence in Vietnam. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(1), 830–847.
Hamdam, A., Jusoh, R., Yahya, Y., Abdul Jalil, A., & Zainal Abidin, N. H. (2021). Auditor judgment and decision-making in big data environment: a proposed research framework. Accounting Research Journal, 35(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-04-2020-0078
Hamshari, Y. M., Ali, H. Y., & Alqam, M. A. (2021). The Relationship of Professional Skepticism to the Risks of Auditing and Internal Control, and the Discovery of Fraud and Core Errors in the Financial Statements in Jordan. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0042
Hay, D. (2017). Opportunities for auditing research: Back to our interdisciplinary roots. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(3), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-04-2017-0137
Hay, D. (2018). The potential for greater use of meta-analysis in archival auditing research. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2017-1562
Henrizi, P., Himmelsbach, D., & Hunziker, S. (2020). Anchoring and adjustment effects on audit judgments: experimental evidence from Switzerland. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), 598–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2020-0011
Hillison, S. M., & Vittori, K. D. (2024). How does management voluntary disclosure behavior influence auditors’ judgments? Journal of Accounting Research, 62(2), 675–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12531
Ho, S. Y., Phang, S. Y., & Moroney, R. (2022). The combined effect of perspective-taking and incentives on professional skepticism. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2021-3019
Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29(3), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(86)90013-8
Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practise and Theory, 29(1), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
Idris, A., Rahmawati, A., & Surwanti, A. (2023). Theoretical models of financial literacy: A Bibliometric analysis and literature review. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 16(1), 89–127. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol16no1.4
IFAC (International Federation of Accountants). (2014). International Education Standards (IES) 3: Initial Professional Development – Professional Skills (Revised) (Issue January, pp. 1–13). http://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/ies-3-initial-professional-development-professional-skills-revised
Isyarani, S. N., & Astuti, C. D. (2023). The influence of intelligence factors on the auditors performance at public accounting firms in Jakarta area. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 12(6), 4762–4770. https://enrichment.iocspublisher.org/index.php/enrichment/article/view/1117
Janssen, S., Hardies, K., Vanstraelen, A., & Zehms, K. M. (2021). Auditors’ professional skepticism: traits, behavioral intentions, and actions. SSRN Electronic Journal, February, 1–69. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3717615
Johnson, R. N., & Wiley, L. D. (2019). Auditing: A Practical Approach with Data Analytics (First Edit). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
Kerler, W. A., & Killough, L. N. (2009). The effects of satisfaction with a client’s management during a prior audit engagement, trust, and moral reasoning on auditors’ perceived risk of management fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9752-x
Khaleel, R. A., Aghaei, M. A., Rami, B. K., & Sepasi, S. (2023). Long-term effect of economic status on auditors’ professional skepticism. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v11i4.3771
Kim, S., Kim, T., Pae, S., & Kim, S. (2018). Audit fees via an indirect payment channel and professional skepticism. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(5), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2016-1490
Knipe, P. J., & Bitter, M. E. (2011). The central Florida emphysema foundation audit: A case study of personal and professional responsibility. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(2), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-10002
Lamboglia, R., Lavorato, D., Scornavacca, E., & Za, S. (2020). Exploring the relationship between audit and technology. A bibliometric analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(5), 1233–1260. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2020-0836
Libby, R., & Luft, J. (1993). Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(5), 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90040-D
Mashayekhi, B., Dolatzarei, E., Faraji, O., & Rezaee, Z. (2024). Mapping the state of expanded audit reporting: a bibliometric view. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(2), 579–612. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2022-1809
Munidewi, I. A. B., Ludigdo, U., Djamhuri, A., & Andayani, W. (2024). Role of affective neuroscience in audit judgement and decisions making: A systematic literature review for auditing research. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 18(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v18i1.08
Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Biddinika, M. K., & Triawan, F. (2020a). Evaluation on research effectiveness in a subject area among top class universities: A case of Indonesia’s academic publication dataset on chemical and material sciences. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 15(3), 1747–1775.
Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Biddinika, M. K., & Triawan, F. (2020b). How bibliographic dataset portrays decreasing number of scientific publication from Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(1), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v5i1.22265
Nelson, M. W. (2009). A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practise and Theory, 28(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1
Nelson, M. W., & Tan, H. (2005). Interpersonal Interaction Perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(supplement), 41–71.
Nguyen, L., & Kohda, Y. (2017). Toward a model of wisdom determinants in the auditing profession. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January, 4604–4613. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.560
Nolder, C. J., & Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67(March), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010
Nugrahanti, T. P., & Jahja, A. S. (2018). Audit judgment performance: The effect of performance incentives, obedience pressures and ethical perceptions. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 6(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2018.09.004
Nwachukwu, C. E., Usman, T. O., Akhor, S. O., & Oladipupo, A. O. (2021). Auditing in the New Age of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Business Strategy and Automation, 2(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijbsa.20210101.oa2
O’Malley. (2000). Panel on Audit Effectiveness “Panel on Audit Effectiveness report and recommendations : August 31, 2000.” In Association Sections, Divisions, Boards, Teams. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_assoc/270
Omer, T. C., Sharp, N. Y., & Wang, D. (2018). The Impact of Religion on the Going Concern Reporting Decisions of Local Audit Offices. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3045-6
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372(n71), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Parluhutan, C. A., Ermawati, & Widyastuti, S. (2022). The Influence of Auditor Ethics, Auditor Motivation, Locus of Control on Audit Quality: Role of Professional Skepticism. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10(1), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2022.100127
Peterson, J. B., & Thorndike, E. L. (1901). The Human Nature Club : An Introduction to the Study of Mental Life. Philosophical Review, 10(6), 676–677. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2176229?origin=JSTOR-pdf
Pinsker, R., Pennington, R., & Schafer, J. K. (2009). The influence of roles, advocacy, and adaptation to the accounting decision environment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 21(2), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2009.21.2.91
Popova, V. (2013). Exploration of skepticism, client-specific experiences, and audit judgments. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(2), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901311284540
Poulton, E. C. (1994). Behavioral decision theory: a new approach. Cambridge University Press.
Putri, N. S., Saifudin, S., & Trilestari, R. D. I. (2024). Fraud Disclosure : A Systematic Literature Review Approach. Solusi, 22(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.26623/slsi.v22i3.7810
Quadackers, L., Groot, T., & Wright, A. (2014). Auditors’ professional skepticism: neutrality versus presumptive doubt. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 639–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12052
Rodgers, W., Mubako, G. N., & Hall, L. (2017). Knowledge management: The effect of knowledge transfer on professional skepticism in audit engagement planning. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.069
Saifudin, S., & Januarti, I. (2023). Semiotics of audit quality: a meta-analysis perspective. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 24(3), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v24i3.19390
Saifudin, S., Januarti, I., & Laguador, J. M. (2025). Measuring the Role of Female Auditor Behavior: Evidence in Indonesia. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 8(2), 298–319. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v8i2.614
Saifudin, S., Januarti, I., & Purwanto, A. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Audit Process and How to Fraud Detections: A Literature Outlook. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1), 4185–4203. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6301
Samagaio, A., & Felício, T. (2022). The influence of the auditor’s personality in audit quality. Journal of Business Research, 141(November 2021), 794–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.082
Shen, X., & Wang, L. (2020). Topic evolution and emerging topic analysis based on open source software. Journal of Data and Information Science, 5(4), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2020-0033
Singh, B. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of behavioral finance and behavioral accounting. American Business Review, 24(2), 198–230. https://doi.org/10.37625/ABR.24.2.198-230
Solomon, I., & Shield, M. D. (1995). Judgment and decision-making research in auditing. In A. H. Ashton in Robert H.;Ashton (Ed.), Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting and Auditing (pp. 137–175). Cambridge University Press.
Sujana, E., & Dharmawan, N. A. S. (2023). Audit Quality Improvement and the Role of Risk: Audit as a Moderator. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 17(4), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v17i4.14
Takemura, K. (2014). Behavioral decision theory: psychological and mathematical descriptions of human choice behavior. Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.12.020161.002353
Takemura, K. (2021). Escaping from bad decisions: a behavioral decision-theoretic perspective (M. Altman (ed.)). academic press: imprint of Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-816032-9.00008-9
Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. In The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements (Vol. 2, Issue 4). The Macmillan Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092987
Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal Intellegence: experimental studies. The Macmillan Company.
Thorndike, R. L. (1985). The Central Role of General Ability in Prediction. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20(3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2003_1
Trotman, K. (2014). Judgment and decision making. In The Routledge Companion to Auditing (pp. 1–364). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094921
Trotman, K. T., & Yetton, P. W. (1985). The Effect of the Review Process on Auditor Judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 256. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490918
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainly: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1738360
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Watkins, A. L., Hillison, W., & Morecroft, S. E. (2004). Audit quality: A synthesis of theory and empirical research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, 153–193. https://www.proquest.com/docview/216304484
Wechsler, D. (1975). Intelligence defined and undefined: A relativistic appraisal. American Psychologist, 30(2), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076868
Wechsler, D., Coalson, D. ., & Raiford, S. . (2008). WAIS-IV: Wechsler adult intelligence scale : Technical and Interpretive Manual. Pearson.
Yao, J., Su, S., & Liu, S. (2023). The effect of key audit matters reviewing on loan approval decisions? Finance Research Letters, 58(PB), 104467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104467
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saifudin, Ardiani Ika Sulistyawati, Yulianti, Dian Indriana Trilestari, Surjawati, Dian Indudewi, Amerti Irvin Widowati, Shujahat Ali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
