Cognitive Approaches to Disaster Communication: Mass Media’s Role in Tsunami Preparedness

Pratiwi Cristin Harnita, Ester Krisnawati, Norif Didik Nur Imanah, Rusana Rusana, Rendy Hermanto Abraham

Abstract


Introduction: This study explored the role of mass media in enhancing tsunami preparedness among young adults on the southern coast of Central Java, a region highly vulnerability to tectonic events. Mass media, with its extensive reach and persuasive influence, played a significant role in disaster communication, shaping public awareness and preparedness.
Methods: Guided by Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and neuroscience perspectives, the research examined how cognitive and emotional responses to disaster information influenced preparedness behaviors. A survey was conducted with 175 respondents aged 18-24 from Calaca, a high-risk tsunami zone. Among these, 91 respondents had prior disaster experience, with 60.38% relying on mass media as their primary source of emergency information.
Findings: The survey results showed that 74.9% of respondents indicated readiness for disaster preparedness. The study integrated the ELM framework with cognitive neuroscience, emphasizing modification to critical element such as ability to process information and the nature of cognitive processing. These adaptations supported more effective, persuasive disaster communication.
Originality: The finding underscored the potential of mass media as powerful stimulus, shaping cognitive responses and preparedness behavior. This research contributed to understanding the interplay between disaster communication, cognitive processes, and behavioral outcomes, offering insights for designing targeted interventions to enhance preparedness.

Keywords


Mass Media, Tsunami Preparedness, Disaster Communication, Elaboration Likelihood Model, Cognitive Process

References


Aitsi-Selmi, A., Blanchard, K., & Murray, V. (2016). Ensuring science is useful, usable and used in global disaster risk reduction and sustainable development: a view through the Sendai framework lens. Palgrave Communications, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.16

Amri, A., Bird, D. K., Ronan, K., Haynes, K., & Towers, B. (2017). Disaster risk reduction education in Indonesia: Challenges and recommendations for scaling up. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 17(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-595-2017

Arai, K. (2013). How to transmit disaster information effectively: A linguistic perspective on Japan’s Tsunami Warnings and Evacuation Instructions. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 4, 150–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-013-0016-8

Boy, J., Rensink, R. A., Bertini, E., & Fekete, J.-D. (2014). A principled way of assessing visualization literacy. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 1963–1972. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346984

Ceyhan, G. D., & Saribas, D. (2022). Research trends on climate communication in the post-truth era. Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 39(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2021.2001295

Doyle, E. E. H., Johnston, D. M., Smith, R., & Paton, D. (2019). Communicating model uncertainty for natural hazards: A qualitative systematic thematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 33, 449–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.023

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2014). The science of science communication II. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(supplement_4), 13583–13584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414635111

Fokaefs, A., & Sapountzaki, K. (2021). Crisis communication after earthquakes in Greece and Japan: Effects on seismic disaster management. Sustainability, 13(16), 9257.

Gould, S. F., Beeton, N. J., Harris, R. M. B., Hutchinson, M. F., Lechner, A. M., Porfirio, L. L., & Mackey, B. G. (2014). A tool for simulating and communicating uncertainty when modelling species distributions under future climates. Ecology and Evolution, 4(24), 4798–4811. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1319

Istiyanto, D. C., Tanaka, S., & Okazumi, T. (2011). Syamsidik,“Towards better mitigation of tsunami disaster in Indonesia,.” Proc. International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, 556–567.

J. Kitchen, P., Kerr, G., E. Schultz, D., McColl, R., & Pals, H. (2014). The elaboration likelihood model: review, critique and research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), 2033–2050. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2011-0776

Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/268109

Khumairoh, Z., Widana, I. D. K. K., & Sumantri, S. H. (2021). The role of communication as the disaster risk reduction in Indonesia capital city transference policy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 708(1), 12101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/708/1/012101

Kubíček, P., & Šašinka, Č. (2011). Thematic uncertainty visualization usability–comparison of basic methods. Annals of GIS, 17(4), 253–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2011.625978

Lang, P. J., & Davis, M. (2006). Emotion, motivation, and the brain: reflex foundations in animal and human research. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 3–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56001-7

LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23(1), 155–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155

Lien, D. G. (2019). Aktivitas Kehumasan dalam Komunikasi Bencana (Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif Aktivitas Publikasi Humas Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB) dalam Optimalisasi Komunikasi Bencana). Universitas Sumatera Utara.

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005

Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167

Moorthy, R., Benny, G., & Gill, S. S. (2018). Disaster communication in managing vulnerabilities. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(2), 51–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3402-04

Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767–1778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041

Oberauer, K. (2019). Working memory and attention–A conceptual analysis and review. Journal of Cognition, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.58

Petty, R. E., & Brinol, P. (2008). Persuasion: From single to multiple to metacognitive processes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00071.x

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 668–672. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21660/2019.63.4684

Purworini, D., Purnamasari, D., & Hartuti, D. P. (2019). Crisis communication in a natural disaster: A chaos theory approach. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3502-03

Rahman, A., & Munadi, K. (2019). Communicating risk in enhancing disaster preparedness: A pragmatic example of disaster risk communication approach from the case of smong story. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 273(1), 12040. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/273/1/012040

Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432–448). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887011

Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019). Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7662–7669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805871115

Tagliacozzo, S., & Magni, M. (2016). Communicating with communities (CwC) during post-disaster reconstruction: an initial analysis. Natural Hazards, 84(3), 2225–2242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2550-3

Takeuchi, Y., Xu, W., Kajitani, Y., & Okada, N. (2012). Investigating Risk Communication Process for Community’s Disaster Reduction with a Framework of" Communicative Survey Method". Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 33(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2328/jnds.33.49

Tolentino Jr, A. S. (2007). The challenges of tsunami disaster response planning and management. Technology, 7(1).

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683

Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020). Defining misinformation and understanding its bounded nature: Using expertise and evidence for describing misinformation. Political Communication, 37(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1716500

Zander, K. K., Sibarani, R., Lassa, J., Nguyen, D., & Dimmock, A. (2022). How do Australians use social media during natural hazards? A survey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 81, 103207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103207




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v15i1.4019

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal The Messenger

View My Stats  [Jurnal The Messenger] is an  International Scientific Journal, Published by the Department of Communication, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Universitas Semarang (Central Java, Indonesia). It  is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.