Social Presence of Ruangguru in Social Media during Covid-19 Pandemic

Raihan Abiyan Fattah, Firman Kurniawan Sujono


Covid-19 Pandemic gives many social changes in society specially in communications study. One important policy made during Covid-19 is related to students who are required to study at home. Ruangguru is top of mind in digital based learning company, especially during this pandemic. Covid-19 and this policy made Ruangguru as Indonesia online learning company with the most followers, to adapt in giving online communication message, especially in @ruangguru (Instagram). This research aims to see the social presence of Ruangguru in social media (Instagram) during Covid-19 Pandemic through three dimensions of social presence, which are: social context, online communication, and interactivity. On previous research, it was mentioned that social presence relates to brand engagement. Brand's social presence in social media is important to be researched due to more brand using social media as primary communication tool to gain brand engagement. Method used in this research is case study with qualitative approach. Through Ruangguru's post on Instagram, researcher observes using three dimensions of social presence. The result of this research depicts Ruangguru as showing good social presence based on three dimensions of social presence during Covid-19 Pandemic in social media Instagram.


Social Presence, Ruangguru, Social Media, Covid-19 Pandemic

Full Text:



Baxter, L. A., & Babbie, E. (2004). The Basics of Communication Research. Belmont: Holly J. Allen.

Caspi, A., & Blau, I. (2008). Social presence in online discussion groups: Testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 11(3), 323–346.

Chaffey, D., & Smith, P. (2017). Digital Marketing Excellence: Planning, Optimizing and Integrating Online Marketing (Fifth). New York: Routledge.

Chang, C.-M., & Hsu, M.-H. (2016). Understanding the determinants of users’ subjective wellbeing in social networking sites: an integration of social capital theory and social presence theory. Behaviour & Information Technology 35. Journal of Brand Management, 10(9), 33–58.

Cowan, L. (2006). Understanding Social Context : Literature Review.

Cui, G., Lockee, B., & Meng, C. (2013). Building modern online social presence: A review of social presence theory and its instructional design implications for future trends. Education and Information Technologies, 18(4), 661–685.

David, M., & Sutton, C. D. (2004). Social Research: The Basics. London: SAGE.

Davis, R., Piven, I., & Breazeale, M. (2014). Conceptualizing the brand in social media community: The five sources model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), 468–481.

De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2012). Popularity of Brand Posts on Brand Fan Pages: An Investigation of the Effects of Social Media Marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83–91.

Duffy, A. (2015). The road more travelled: How user-generated content can lead to homogenized travel journalism. Continuum, 29(6), 821–832.

Eriyanto. (2011). Analisis isi: Pengantar Metodologi untuk Penelitian Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial lainya. Indonesia: Prenada Media Group.

Gironda, J. T., & Korgaonkar, P. K. (2014). Understanding consumers’ social networking site usage. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(5–6), 571–605.

Hasanuddin, Pramudibyanto, H., & Hermawati, Y. (2012). Kehadiran Sosial Dosen UT dalam CMC (Computer Mediated Communication) melalui Aktivitas Tutorial Online (Pengembangan Model Panduan Komunikasi bagi Tutor Tutorial Online UT). Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Terbuka.

Helal, G., Ozuem, W., & Lancaster, G. (2018). Social media brand perceptions of millennials. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 46(10), 977–998.

Joo, T. M., & Teng, C. E. (2016). use of Social Media in PR: A Change of Trend. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(4), 1279–1288.

Kartosapoetro, I. S. (2019). “RuangGuru” dan Perubahan Pendidikan di Indonesia. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from website:

Khan, A. R. (2009). Digital Signage System (Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)). Retrieved from

Kirk, S. A., & Sigrid, K. (2012). Computer-Mediated Communication Across Cultures: International Interactions in Online Environments. IGI Global.

Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2017). Marketing 4.0 Moving from Traditional to Digital. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Kurniawan, F. (2020). Digita Dilemma: Problem Kontemporer Adopsi Media Digital di Indonesia. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Llopis, G. (2014). Consumers Are No Longger Brand Loyal. Retrieved November 3, 2019, from website:

Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353.

Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). The Evolution and Influence of Social Presence Theory on Online Learning. 124–139.

Man, N. I., Abdullah, A. P. D. Z., Tamam, E., & Hasan, N. A. (2019). A Communications Strategy of the Malaysian Research Universities to add Value. Jurnal The Messenger, 11(1), 56.

Masyrafina, I. (2020). Karantina di Rumah, Pengguna Aplikasi Belajar Naik Drastis. Retrieved from Republika website:

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (36th ed.). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Moro, S., & Rita, P. (2018). Brand strategies in social media in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 343–364.

Nambisan, P., & Watt, J. H. (2011). Managing customer experiences in online product communities. Journal of Business Research, 64(8), 889–895.

Osei-Frimpong, K., & McLean, G. (2018). Examining online social brand engagement: A social presence theory perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128(September 2017), 10–21.

Pranata, E. W., Latif, M. C., & Fanani, F. (2019). Symbolic Interaction of The Deaf Students in Public School. Jurnal The Messenger, 11(1), 1.

Saxton, G. D., & Waters, R. D. (2014). What do Stakeholders Like on Facebook? Examining Public Reactions to Nonprofit Organizations’ Informational, Promotional, and Community-Building Messages. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(3), 280–299.

Shimp, T. A., & Andrews, J. C. (2013). Advertising, Promotion, and other aspects of Integrated Marketing Communications. In Integrated Marketing communications (9 ed). Retrieved from Final-Bulka.pdf?sequence=1

Skinner, C. (2019). Manusia Digital (Terjemahan). Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Slack, F., & Rowley, J. (2001). Observation: Perspectives on research methodologies for leisure managers. Management Research News, 24(1–2), 35–42.

Straubhaar, J., LaRose, R., & Davenport, L. (2012). Media Now: Understanding Media, Culture and Technology (7th ed.). Wadsworth.

Tu, C. H. (2002). The impacts of text-based CMC on online social presence. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1–24.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal The Messenger

View My Stats [Jurnal The Messenger] is an International Scientific Journal, Published by the Department of Communication, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Universitas Semarang (Central Java, Indonesia). It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.