Unveiling Social Gratifications Sought and Obtained from Social Media Utilization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v12i2.1818Keywords:
Social Media Utilization, Social Gratifications, Social Capital, Social Influence, Social InteractionsAbstract
Going by the proposition of the Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT), people are motivated to use media by various psychological factors and for obtaining different forms of gratifications. However, as social media continue to play an essential role in shaping the sociability and bridging social connectivity and interactions among its users, therefore, this study seeks to incorporate social influence and social interactions as the social gratification sought in social media utilization, as well as both bonding and bridging social capital as social gratification obtained from social media utilization. An online survey was conducted among 400 users of Instagram in Nigeria. The data analyzed with PLS-SEM revealed that social influence and social interaction significantly motivate social media utilization. Also, social media utilization is significantly associated with bonding and bridging social capital. Impliedly, this study shows that social media is a social and networking tool which is stimulated by social factors and for achieving social purposes such as getting help, support and community engagements.
Downloads
References
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17 42.
Appel, L., Dadlani, P., Dwyer, M., Hampton, K., Kitzie, V., Matni, Z. A., Moore, P., & Teodoro, R. (2014). Testing the validity of social Capital Measures in the study of information and communication technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 398 416.
Arikewuyo, A. O., Efe- –zad, B., & Lasisi, T. (2019). Erotic use of Social Media Pornography in Gratifying Romantic Relationship Desires. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 1(2), 1 20.
Arikewuyo, A. O., Efe- –zad, B., & Owolabi, A. (2020). I U : A Semiotic Analysis of Romantic Relationship Bitmojis on Social Media. In It Happened on Tinder: Reflections and Studies on Internet-Infused Dating (pp. 134 144). Institute of Network Cultures. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338178515_I_U _A_SEMIOTIC_ANALYSIS_OF_ROMANTIC_RELATIONSHIP_BITMOJIS_ON_SOCIAL_MEDIA
Arikewuyo, A. O., Eluwole, K. K., & Ozad, B. (2020). Influence of Lack of Trust on Romantic Relationship Problems: The Mediating Role of Partner Cell Phone Snooping. Psychological Reports, 12(10), 1 10.
Arikewuyo, A. O., Ozad, B., & Saidu, A. (2018). Use of Social Media in Establishing Virtual Relationship among select University Students. Novena Journal of Communication, 6.
Bagozzi, R. P., Dholakia, U. M., & Pearo, L. R. K. (2007). Antecedents and Consequences of Online Social Interactions. Media Psychology, 9(1), 77 114.
Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2010). Mobile communication and social capital. New Media & Society, 12(3), 435 451.
Cheung, M. K. C., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2010). Online Social Networks: Why Do Students Use Facebook? Computers in Human Behaviour, 27(4), 1337 1343.
Dewan, S., & Ramaprasad, J. (2014). Social Media, Traditional Media, and Music Sales. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 101 121.
Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. Bt Technology Journal, 22(4), 71 82.
Dunne, ., Lawlor, M. A., & Rowley, J. (2010). Young People s Use of Online Social Networking Sites A Uses and Gratifications Perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 4(1), 46 58.
Eggers, F., Hatak, I., Kraus, S., & Niemand, T. (2017). Technologies That Support Marketing and Market Development in SMEs €” Evidence from Social Networks. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(2), 270 302.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook Friends: social capital and college students use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143 1168.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection Strategies: Social Capital Implications of Facebook-Enabled Communication Practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873 892. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385389
Fitrianti, A., Febriana, K. A., & Ersyad, F. A. (2020). Personal branding Cino Fajrin through Instragram. Jurnal The Messenger, 12(1), 74 83.
Geber, S., Scherer, H., & Hefner, D. (2016). Social capital in media societies: The impact of media use and media structures on social capital. International Communication Gazette, 78(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516640211
Greenhow, C., & Cathy, L. (2014). Social media and education: reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Journal Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6 30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954
Gruzd, A., Valle, M. E. Del, Haythornthwaite, C., & Paulin, D. (2017). Social Media in Educational Practice: Faculty Present and Future Use of Social Media in Teaching. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.019 €
Gupta, H., Singh, S., & Sinha, P. (2017). Multimedia tool as a predictor for social media advertising- a YouTube way. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76, 18557 18568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-4249-6
Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1999). Affect, Cognition, and Social Attitudes. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (pp. 75 100). Wiley.
Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and Social Capital in a wired suburb. City & Community, 2(4), 277 311.
Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 359(1449), 1435 1446.
Hossein, & Nia, F. H. (2017). A New Method of Rural E-Business, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Development in India. International Journal of Networks and Communications, 7(2), 33 39. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijnc.20170702.01
Indriani, S. S., & Prasanti, D. (2019). Understanding multiculturalism in family on Whatapp group in the distruption era. Jurnal The Messenger, 11(2), 209 219.
Ji, Q., Raney, A. A., Losh, S. C., Sypher, U., & Merle, P. F. (2016). Watching with Virtual Crowds: The Popularity, Motivation, and Effect of Live Posting during Entertainment TV Viewing [Florida State University]. http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_2016SP_Ji_fsu_0071E_12840
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of Mass Communication by the Individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The Uses of Mass Communication: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage.
Katz, Elihu. (1957). The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis. Political Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), 61 78. https://doi.org/10.1086/266687
Katz, Elihu, Gurevitch, M., & Haas, H. (1973). On the Use of the Mass Media for Important Things. American Sociological Review, 38(2), 164 181.
Katz, J. (1987). What makes crime `news ? Media Culture & Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/016344387009001004
Kavanaugh, A., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Zin, T. T., & Reese, D. D. (2005). Community networks: Where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer €Mediated Communication, 10(4).
Kaye, B., & Johnson, T. (2002). Online and in the Know: Uses and Gratifications of the Web for Political Information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 54 71.
Larose, R., & Eastin, M. S. (2004). A Social Cognitive Theory of Internet Uses and Gratifications: Toward a New Model of Media Attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 358 377.
Ledbetter, A. M., Taylor, S. H., & Mazer, J. P. (2016). Enjoyment Fosters Media Use Frequency and Determines its Relational Outcomes: Toward a Synthesis of Uses and Gratifications Theory and Media Multiplexity Theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 54(149 157).
Leung, L. (2001). Gratifications, Chronic Loneliness and Internet Use. Asian Journal of Communication, 11(1), 96 119.
Leung, Louis, & Wei, R. (2000). More Than Just Talk on The Movie: Uses and Gratifications of The Cellular Phone. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 308.
Lin, N., & Erickson, B. H. (2008). Theory, measurement, and the research enterprise on social capital. In N. Lin & B. H. Erickson (Eds.), Social capital. An international research program. Oxford University Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234387.003.0010U
Luo, X. (2002). Uses and Gratifications Theory and E-Consumer Behaviors. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2(2), 34 41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2002.10722060
Markham, T. (2016). Review essay: Social Media, Politics and Protest. Media Culture & SOciety, 38(6), 946 957. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716665101
McKee, A. C., Stern, R. A., Nowinsk, C. J., Stein, T. D., Alvarez, V. E., Daneshvar, D. H., Lee, H.-S., Wojtowicz, S. M., Hall, G., Baugh, C. M., Riley, D. O., Kubilus, C. A., Cormier, K. A., Jacobs, M. A., Martin, B. R., Abraham, C. R., Ikezu, T., Reichard, R. R., Wolozin, B. L., €¦ Cantu, R. C. (2013). The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain, 136(1), 43 64. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws307
Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 420 435.
Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The Role of Desired and Anticipated Emotions in Goal-Directed Behaviours: Broadening and Deepening The Theory of Planned Behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 79 98.
Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A., & Sabherwal, R. (2009). Usability and Socialability in Online Communities: A Comparative Study of Knowledge Seeking and Contribution. Journal of The Association for Information Systems, 10(10), 721 747.
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. J. (2017). Gratifications of Using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to Follow Brands: The Moderating Effect of Social Comparison, Trust, Tie Strength, and Network Homophily on Brand Identification, Brand Engagement, Brand Commitment, and Membership Intentio. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 412 424.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone. Simon & Schuster.
Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350 361.
Rathnayake, C., & Winter, J. S. (2018). Carrying Forward the Uses and Grats 2.0 Agenda: An Affordance-Driven Measure of Social Media Uses and Gratifications. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(3), 371 389. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2018.1451861
Resnick, P. (2001). Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. HCI in the New Millennium, 77, 247 272.
Robinson, J. P., & Martin, S. (2010). IT use and declining social capital? Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 45 63.
Ruggiero, T. E. (2009). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3 337. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
Siapera, E., & Veglis, A. (2012). The Handbook of Global Online Journalism. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Urista, M. A., Dong, Q., & Day, K. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication, 12, 215 299.
Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436 455.
Whiting, A., & Williams, D. L. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research, 16(4).
Xiang, Z., & Gretzel, U. (2010). Role of Social Media in Online Travel Information Search. Tourism Management, 31(2), 179 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.016
Zolkepli, I. A., Kamarulzaman, Y., & Kitchen, P. J. (2018). Uncovering psychological gratifications affecting social media utilization: A multiblock hierarchical analysis. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 26(4), 412 430.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Form
The copyright to this article is transferred to the Department of Communication, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Universitas Semarang if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to the Department of Communication, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Universitas Semarang. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to the Department of Communication, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Universitas Semarang. The copyright transfer not covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the Department of Communication, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Universitas Semarang copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies the Department of Communication, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Universitas Semarang endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.