Do Political Parties Satisfy Voter's Communication Needs? Content Analysis of Twitter, YouTube and Instagram Posts

Manpreet Kaur, Rajesh Verma, Frank Nana Kweku Otoo

Abstract


Introduction: In an electronic democracy, politicians avoid being solely dependent on traditional communication channels like news media. Social media acts a political communication tool and Uses Gratification (UG) theory explains how people use media for their needs. Therefore, the attempt has been made to analyze the information shared on these social media platforms by political parties to communicate has any effect on communication needs according to Uses Gratification theory.

Methods: Content analysis was employed to achieve the objectives using R software, where in data was acquired from social media platforms of major political parties of India and the coding was developed to classify the extracted data into communication needs as per UG theory.

Findings: The content analysis shows that among all parties, BJP has higher visibility and consistency on Twitter and Instagram, satisfying cognitive needs. Most parties satisfy affective needs on Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. However, YouTube content is less satisfying for personal integrative, social integrative, and tension released needs.

Originality: The current study tried to use innovative methods or combining methods in a new way. It provided new insights or implications that have not been extensively discussed. Therefore, Political parties should focus on specific social media for interactive and efficient information spread.

Keywords


Communication Needs, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, Political Communation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alhabash, S., Chiang, Y. H., & Huang, K. (2014). MAM & U&G in Taiwan: Differences in the uses and gratifications of Facebook as a function of motivational reactivity. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.033

Alwan, W. H., Fazl-Ersi, E., & Vahedian, A. (2020). Identifying influential users on instagram through visual content analysis. IEEE Access, 8, 169594–169603. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3020560

Ballard, C. L. (2011). What’s happening @Twitter: A uses and gratifications approach. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_theses/155

Bene, M., Ceron, A., Fenoll, V., Haßler, J., Kruschinski, S., Larsson, A. O., Magin, M., Schlosser, K., & Wurst, A. K. (2022). Keep Them Engaged! Investigating the Effects of Self-centered Social Media Communication Style on User Engagement in 12 European Countries. Political Communication, 39(4), 429–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2042435

Blassnig, S., Udris, L., Staender, A., & Vogler, D. (2021). Popularity on Facebook During Election Campaigns: An Analysis of Issues and Emotions in Parties’ Online Communication. International Journal of Communication, 15(0), 21. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17040

Bode, L., & Dalrymple, K. E. (2016). Politics in 140 Characters or Less: Campaign Communication, Network Interaction, and Political Participation on Twitter. Journal of Political Marketing, 15(4), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.959686

Chen, G. M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023

Gibson, R. K., & McAllister, I. (2006). Does Cyber‐Campaigning Win Votes? Online Communication in the 2004 Australian Election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 16(3), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13689880600950527

Gibson, R. K., & McAllister, I. (2011). Do online election campaignswin votes? the 2007 Australian “YouTube” election. Political Communication, 28(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.568042

Giger, N., Bailer, S., Sutter, A., & Turner-Zwinkels, T. (2021). Policy or person? What voters want from their representatives on Twitter. Electoral Studies, 74, 102401. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELECTSTUD.2021.102401

Gueorguieva, V. (2008). Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond. Social Science Computer Review, 26(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307305636

Han, S., Min, J., & Lee, H. (2015). Antecedents of social presence and gratification of social connection needs in SNS: A study of Twitter users and their mobile and non-mobile usage. International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.004

Hargittai, E., & Litt, E. (2011). The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/1461444811405805, 13(5), 824–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811405805

Heidenreich, T., Eberl, J. M., Tolochko, P., Lind, F., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2024). My Voters Should See This! What News Items Are Shared by Politicians on Facebook? International Journal of Press/Politics, 29(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221104740/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_19401612221104740-FIG4.JPEG

Hsu, C. leng, & Park, H. W. (2012). Mapping online social networks of Korean politicians. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.009

Katz, E. (1959). Mass Communications Research and the Study of Popular Culture: An Editorial Note on a Possible Future for This Journal. Undefined.

Kaur, M., & Verma, R. (2018). Demographics, Social Media Usage, and Political Engagement in Punjab. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(11), 43. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i11/137984

Kaur, M., & Verma, R. (2021). Political party’s fan page posts and online engagement on Facebook. In Int. J. Internet Marketing and Advertising (Vol. 15, Issue 3).

Kaur, M., & Verma, R. (2022). Influence of Use of Different Media on Political Attitude and Political Participation. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.17010/IJOM/2022/V52/I3/168656

Kruikemeier, S. (2014). Computers in Human Behavior How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025

Li, H., Liu, Y., Xu, X., Heikkilä, J., & Van Der Heijden, H. (2015). Modeling hedonic is continuance through the uses and gratifications theory: An empirical study in online games. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.053

Lowery, S., & DeFleur, M. L. (1983). Milestones in Mass Communication Research | 3rd edition | Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/store/p/milestones-in-mass-communication-research/P100000877680

Marquart, F., Brosius, A., & de Vreese, C. (2022). United Feelings: The Mediating Role of Emotions in Social Media Campaigns for EU Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Political Marketing, 21(1), 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2019.1618429

McIlwraith, R. D. (1998). “I’m addicted to television”: The personality, imagination, and TV watching patterns of self-identified TV addicts. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159809364456

McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198659

Möller, A. M., Kühne, R., Baumgartner, S. E., & Peter, J. (2019). Exploring User Responses to Entertainment and Political Videos: An Automated Content Analysis of YouTube. Social Science Computer Review, 37(4), 510–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318779336

Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C. H. (2010). Is it really about me?: Message content in social awareness streams. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718953

Nash, S. M. (2015). Life Beyond the Like : Uses & Gratifications of Sharing Business Facebook Page Content.

Oloo, & Leica, F. (2013). “Instagratification”: Uses and gratification of instagram by university students for interpersonal communication. https://i-rep.emu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11129/1367

Papagiannidis, S., Coursaris, C. K., & Bourlakis, M. (2012). Do websites influence the nature of voting intentions? The case of two national elections in Greece. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 28(2), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.013

Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2011, December 16). Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship ... - John H. Parmelee, Shannon L. Bichard - Google Books. Lexington Books. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=ZcVxGdegAJ8C&newbks=0&hl=en&source=newbks_fb&redir_esc=y

Parmelee, J. H., Perkins, S. C., & Beasley, B. (2023). Personalization of politicians on Instagram: what Generation Z wants to see in political posts. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1773–1788. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2027500

Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (Jay). (2017). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intentio. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.004

Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0056

Ricke, L. (2010). A new opportunity for democratic engagement: The CNN-YouTube presidential candidate debates. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 7(2–3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681003772768

Robertson, S. P., Vatrapu, R. K., & Medina, R. (2010). Online Video “Friends” Social Networking: Overlapping Online Public Spheres in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(2–3), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681003753420

Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0301_02

Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTMAR.2012.01.002

Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.00117315.2004.02524.X

Stier, S., Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H., & Strohmaier, M. (2019). Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians , Audiences , and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter Election Campaigning on Social Media : Politicians , Audiences , and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook. Political Communication, 35(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728

Sturm Wilkerson, H., Riedl, M. J., & Whipple, K. N. (2021). Affective Affordances: Exploring Facebook Reactions as Emotional Responses to Hyperpartisan Political News. Digital Journalism, 9(8), 1040–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1899011

Swanson, D. L. (1979). Political Communication Research and the Uses and Gratifications Model a Critique. Communication Research, 6(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027900600103

Tan, A. (1985). Mass communication theories and research (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Tanta, I., Mihovilović, M., & Sablić, Z. (2014). Uses and gratification theory - Why adolescents use facebook? Medijska Istrazivanja, 20(2), 85–110.

Towner, T. L. (2013). All Political Participation Is Socially Networked?: New Media and the 2012 Election. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313489656

Towner, T. L., & Dulio, D. A. (2011). An experiment of campaign effects during the youtube election. New Media and Society, 13(4), 626–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810377917

Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and Online Social Networking as Campaign Tools in the 2010 General Elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12023

Wang, R., & Chan-Olmsted, S. (2020). Content marketing strategy of branded YouTube channels. Journal of Media Business Studies, 294–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2020.1783130

Wang, S.-I. (2007). Political Use of the Internet, Political Attitudes and Political Participation. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980701636993

Wang, T.-L. (2014). The Usage Behaviors, Motivations and Gratifications of Using User-Generated Media: The Case Study of Taiwan’s YouTube. Advances in Journalism and Communication, 02(04), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajc.2014.24015

Weismueller, J., Harrigan, P., Coussement, K., & Tessitore, T. (2022). What makes people share political content on social media? The role of emotion, authority and ideology. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, 107150. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2021.107150

Woolley, J. K., Limperos, A. M., & Oliver, M. B. (2010). The 2008 Presidential Election, 2.0: A Content Analysis of User-Generated Political Facebook Groups. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.516864

Yoo, S. Woo., & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2014). Connecting blog, Twitter and Facebook use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Communication and Society, 27(4), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2010). The Revolution Will be Networked: The Influence of Social Networking Sites on Political Attitudes and Behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439309335162

Zhang, W., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2013). Two Sides of the Coin: Assessing the Influence of Social Network Site Use During the 2012 U.S. Presidential Campaign. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313489962




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v16i3.10349

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal The Messenger

View My Stats  [Jurnal The Messenger] is an  International Scientific Journal, Published by the Department of Communication, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Universitas Semarang (Central Java, Indonesia). It  is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.