The Authority of the Republic of Indonesia Police (POLRI) in Handling Cases Based on Restorative Justice

Ruby Nur Adila, Ade Juniara, Vensky Ghaniiyyu Putri Permana

Abstract


Arrangements for the implementation of restorative justice for adult offenders in Indonesia have different standards and requirements between law enforcement agencies, for example, the Police interpret the implementation of restorative justice in the form of peace between the parties and then, on the basis of this peace, a Letter of Order to Stop Investigation (SP3) is issued. Therefore, it is necessary to study further regarding the authority of the Police in handling and terminating cases based on restorative justice. This research is normative research carried out by analyzing norms in statutory regulations and concepts related to restorative justice. The conclusion is that the implementation of restorative justice in the Police is part of the Police's discretionary authority if restorative justice is interpreted as a technique for handling cases with an approach that prioritizes recovery by involving the perpetrator, victim, victim's family, perpetrator's family and impartial third parties. Meanwhile, the issuance of SP3 based on restorative justice is an inappropriate interpretation of the Police's discretionary authority because the SP3 has been integrated in a limitative manner in Article 109(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Keywords


Police, Case Termination, Restorative Justice.

References


Adi Rachmat, Bayu, and Bambang Waluyo. “Juridical Analysis of Fundamental Considerations of The Judge on Defendant’s Attitude at The Trial.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 6, no. 3 (2023): 900. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7313.

Adnyani, Ni Ketut Sari. “Kewenangan Diskresi Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial 7, no. 2 (2021): 135–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v7i2.37389.

Akbar, Muhammad Fatahillah. “Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 51, no. 2 (2022): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.199-208.

Ali, Mahrus. “Sistem Peradilan Pidana Progresif; Alternatif Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 14, no. 2 (2007). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol14.iss2.art2.

Cintya, Sindhi, and Hery Firmansyah. “Penerapan Restorative Justice Sebagai Bentuk Permaafan Hakim Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian Oleh Lansia.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 543. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i2.6379.

Desmon, Andi, Rina Rahma Ornella Angelia, and Rahmi Erwin. “Pemeriksaan Setempat Oleh Hakim Dalam Perkara Pidana.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 345. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6805.

Dewandaru, Laksamana Bagas, Jawade Hafidz, and Latifah Hanim. “The Policy of the Prosecutor’s Authority in Termination of Prosecutions Based on Restorative Justice in Criminal Justice System In Indonesia.” Law Development Journal 4, no. 3 (2022): 403. https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.4.3.403-415.

Eldarifai, Eldarifai, Martin Kustati, Nana Sepriyanti, and Izzi Fekrat. “Delegation of Authority in Islamic Education.” International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science 3, no. 01 (2024): 90–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.99075/ijevss.v3i01.647.

Endrico, Momos, and Tjempaka Tjempaka. “Analysis of the Validity of Authentic Deeds and Legal Responsibility of Notaries in Land Mafia Cases.” Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan 2, no. 8 (2023): 879–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v2i8.117.

Fendiarmo, Andy Pradana. “The Role of the Police in Handling Criminal Cases Through Restorative Justice After the Ratification of Law Number 1 of 2023 Concerning the Criminal Code.” Ratio Legis Journal 2, no. 1 (n.d.): 476–89. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.2.1.%25p.

Flora Saida Henny, Sitanggang Tiromsi, Simarmata Berlian, and Karina Ica. “Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Melindungi Hak Korban Tindak Pidana Cyber: Manifestasidan Implementasi.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 8, no. 2 (2023): 169–84. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i2.6365.

Gandara, Moh. “Kewenangan Atribusi, Delegasi, Dan Mandat.” Khazanah Hukum 2, no. 3 (2020): 92–99. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v2i3. 8167.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Pengertian-Pengertian Dasar Tentang Tindak Pemerintahan (Bestuurshandeling). Djumali, Surabaya. Surabaya: Djumali, 1985.

Hakiki, Azizul. “Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan (SP3) Yang Diterbitkan Berdasarkan Perdamaian Antara Tersangka Dan Pelapor Dalam Delik Biasa.” Wacana Paramarta Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 21, no. 1 (2022): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v21i1.147.

Hasibuan, Edi Saputra, and M H SH. Hukum Kepolisian Dan Criminal Policy Dalam Penegakan Hukum. Depok: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Pers, 2021.

Kahardani, Kahardani, Suwarno Abadi, Nuryanto A Daim, and Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman. “Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Oleh Kepolisian Republik Indonesia (POLRI).” Law and Humanity 1, no. 1 (2023): 65–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37504/lh.v1i1.520.

Kesuma, Derry Angling. “Kewenangan Diskresi Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana.” Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v4i2.809.

Latif, Udin. “Diskresi Penyidik Kepolisian Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Melaui Jalur Non Litigasi.” Muadalah: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (2023): 14–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47945/muadalah.v3i1.967.

Manalu, Sahata. “Analisis Yuridis Tindakan Diskresi Kepolisian Pada Tahap Penyidikan.” Fiat Iustitia 1, no. 1 (2020): 109–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54367/fiat.v1i1.913.

Muhammad, Faiz Emery, and Beniharmoni Harefa. “Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Bagi Pelaku Penipuan Phisning Berbasis Web.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 226. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6649.

Munib, M. A. “Tinjauan Yuridis Kewenangan Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dalam Penyelidikan Dan Penyidikan Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.” Justitiable-Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 60–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56071/justitiable.v1i1.42.

Negara, Tunggul Ansari Setia. “Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches.” Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) 4, no. 1 (2023): 1–9. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855.

Nurhayati, Yati, Ifrani Ifrani, and M Yasir Said. “Metodologi Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2021): 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14.

Putra, Chandra Aulia, Madiasa Ablisar, and Mahmud Mulyadi. “A Restorative Justice Approach to The Settlement of The Persecution Crime At Police Central Barumun.” Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law 2, no. 1 (2023): 71–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v2i1.11272.

Rachman, Taufik. “Dasar Teori Kewenangan Penyidik Maupun Penuntut Umum Dalam Menghentikan Perkara Pidana.” Yuridika 25, no. 1 (2010): 13–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v25i1.5733.

Rahadjo Puro, Djuhandhani, Kukuh Sudarmanto, and Zaenal Arifin. “Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati Dalam Mewujudkan Efek Jera Pada Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 6, no. 3 (2023): 1181. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7945.

Ramadhan, Alfano. “Diskresi Penyidik Polri Sebagai Alternatif Penanganan Perkara Pidana.” Lex Renaissance 6, no. 1 (2021): 25–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss1.art3.

Rida Ista Sitepu, and Yusona Piadi. “Implementasi Restoratif Justice Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 1, no. 1 (2019): 67–75. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v1i1.7.

Said, Abbas. “Tolak Ukur Penilaian Penggunaan Diskresi Oleh Polisi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 1, no. 1 (2012): 147–70. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.1.2012.147-170.

Situngkir, Danel Aditia. “Mengenal Teori Demokrasi Dan Teori Kewenangan Dalam Ilmu Hukum.” Ensiklopedia of Journal 5, no. 4 (2023): 8–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v5i4.1745.

Surbakti, Farrel Eden, and Ali Abdilah. “Perbandingan Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Kepolisian Dalam Konstitusi Yang Pernah Berlaku Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 51, no. 1 (2021): 146–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no1.3012.

Suteja, Made. “Pengawasan Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Polri Mengadakan Tindakan Lain Menurut Hukum Yang Bertanggung Jawab (Diskresi).” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana 2, no. 2 (2013): 44073. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2013.v02.i02.p10.

Taekema, Sanne. “Theoretical and Normative Frameworks for Legal Research: Putting Theory into Practice.” Law and Method, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000031.

Ubleeuw, Agustinus Gabriel Rante, and Mulyanto Mulyanto. “Komparasi Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Penanganan Perkara Pidana Antara Kepolisian Dan Kejaksaan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 10, no. 2 (n.d.): 291–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v10i2.64717.

Ulfah, Maria, Anne Safrina, and W M Herry Susilowati. “Penghentian Penyidikan: Tinjauan Hukum Administrasi Dan Hukum Acara Pidana.” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 29, no. 1 (2017): 16–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.17641.

Wahyu, I Komang Seri Pande, Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini, and Muhamad Jodi Setianto. “Implementasi Restorative Justice Berdasarkan Diskresi Kepolisian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Di Polres Karangasem.” Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 4, no. 1 (2022): 110–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jmpppkn.v4i1.

Waskito, Achmad Budi. “Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perspektif Integrasi.” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 287–304. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i1.2648.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.8983

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal USM LAW REVIEW : Journal Law published by Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.