Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia Melalui Pengesahan Konvensi Mediasi Singapura

Sylvia Janisriwati

Abstract


This study aims to explore the urgency and relevance of the ratification of the Singapore Mediation Convention (SMC) in the context of international arbitration settlement in Indonesia. Using the juridical-normative method, this study analyzes various primary, secondary, and tertiary legal documents. Data collection was conducted through literature studies, which were then analyzed using descriptive methods and content analysis. This study highlights the substantial similarities between the SMC and the 1958 New York Convention, especially regarding the procedural aspects in international settlement settlements. However, this study found that the SMC focuses more on mediation as a non-adjudicative settlement method. The urgency of this study lies in the question of whether Indonesia needs to ratify the SMC considering the existing legal infrastructure, including the New York Convention. The results of the study state that Indonesia does not need to ratify the SMC, because the provisions in the SMC do not make a significant contribution to the dispute settlement system in Indonesia which has been accommodated by the New York Convention. This study provides a new perspective by underlining that the administrative application of the SMC is not relevant to the practical needs of dispute resolution in Indonesia. In conclusion, ratification of the KMS will not provide significant additional benefits for Indonesia, given its similarities with the New York Convention and the KMS’s more limited focus on mediation. This study provides a new contribution to understanding the role of the KMS and its relevance to the Indonesian legal system, and emphasizes the importance of considering specific needs before ratifying a new international convention.




Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi urgensi dan relevansi ratifikasi Konvensi Mediasi Singapura (KMS) dalam konteks penyelesaian sengketa arbitrase internasional di Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif, penelitian ini menganalisis berbagai dokumen hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi pustaka, yang kemudian dianalisis menggunakan metode deskriptif dan analisis isi. Penelitian ini menyoroti adanya persamaan substansial antara KMS dan Konvensi New York 1958, terutama terkait aspek prosedural dalam penyelesaian sengketa internasional. Namun, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa KMS lebih berfokus pada mediasi sebagai metode penyelesaian sengketa non-ajudikatif. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada pertanyaan apakah Indonesia perlu meratifikasi KMS mengingat infrastruktur hukum yang sudah ada, termasuk Konvensi New York. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa Indonesia tidak perlu meratifikasi KMS, karena ketentuan dalam KMS tidak memberikan kontribusi signifikan terhadap sistem penyelesaian sengketa di Indonesia yang sudah diakomodasi oleh Konvensi New York. Penelitian ini memberikan perspektif baru dengan menggarisbawahi bahwa implikasi administratif KMS tidak relevan dengan kebutuhan praktis penyelesaian sengketa di Indonesia. Kesimpulannya, ratifikasi KMS tidak akan memberikan manfaat tambahan yang substansial bagi Indonesia, mengingat adanya kesamaan dengan Konvensi New York serta fokus KMS yang lebih terbatas pada mediasi. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi baru dalam memahami peran KMS dan relevansinya bagi sistem hukum Indonesia, serta menekankan pentingnya mempertimbangkan kebutuhan khusus sebelum meratifikasi konvensi internasional baru.

Keywords


Disputes; Arbitration; Mediation Conventions; Arbitrase; Konvensi Mediasi; Sengketa

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aini, Yulinda Nurul, Yanti Astrelina Purba, and Ruth Meilliana. “Trade Globalization and Its Impact on Welfare in Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14203/jissh.v8i1.81.

Alexander, Nadja Marie. “Singapore Convention on Mediation.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3749007.

Apter, Itai. “The Singapore Convention on Mediation: The Right Instrument at the Right Time.” Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/amp.2021.31.

Asror, Muhammad Hanif, and Fatma Ulfatun Najicha. “Implikasi Pengakuan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Dalam Hukum Indonesia Dan Hukum Internasional.” Borneo Law Review 7, no. 1 (2023): 98–111.

Astiti, Nyoman Adi, and Jefry Tarantang. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Lembaga Arbitrase.” Jurnal Al-Qardh, 2019. https://doi.org/10.23971/jaq.v3i2.1179.

Bermann, George A. “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: The Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention by National Courts,” 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50915-0_1.

Çay, Furkan, and Assem Kalkamanova. “Measuring Populist Discourse of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: A Quantitative Content Analysis.” Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science 55 (2023): 4–18.

Chua, Eunice. “The Singapore Convention on Mediation - A Brighter Future for Asian Dispute Resolution.” Asian Journal of International Law, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251318000309.

Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Kencana, 2018.

Golovko, Olga M, and Vladislava Druz. “Mediation and Arbitration: A Legal Dilemma.” Law and Innovative Society, 2020. https://doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2020-2(15)-12.

Goodale, Geoffrey M., Lucille Hague, Matthew O’Hare, Jonathan M. Meyer, Mario Mancuso, Guy C. Quinlan, Sergio L. Suarez, and Loren Voss. “National Security Law.” International Lawyer, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511509759.004.

Hasanah, Ulfa, and IAIN Madura. “Peran Arbitrase Di Bank Syariah Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Tawazun: Journal of Sharia Economic Law 4 (2021): 196–208.

Jeong, Sun Ju. “Singapore Convention on Mediation and Recognition and Enforcement of Settlement Agreement.” Civil Procedure, 2020. https://doi.org/10.30639/cp.2020.06.24.2.1.

Juratowich QC, Ben. “Departing from Confidentiality in International Dispute Resolution.” Indian Journal of International Economic Law 12, no. 1 (2020): 5.

laurensius Arliman S. “Mediasi Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat Sebagai Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Untuk Mendukung Pembangunan Ekonomi Nasional.” Uir Law Review, 2018.

Neuendorf, Kimberly A., and Anup Kumar. “Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications.” The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 2015.

Pasaribu, Puspa, and Eva Achjani Zulfa. “Akibat Hukum Identitas Palsu Dalam Akta Perjanjian Kredit Yang Melibatkan Pihak Ketiga Pemberi Jaminan.” Jurnal USM Law Review, 2021. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i2.4050.

Pietrasiak, Małgorzata. “The Asean’s Attitude to the South China Sea Dispute after the Verdict of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague.” Przeglad Strategiczny, 2020. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2020.1.13.

Putra, Aista Wisnu, Ro’fah Setyowati, Rahandy Rizki Prananda, and Hendro Saptono. “Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Dalam Sengketa Investasi Pasar Modal Syariah Di Indonesia.” Jurnal USM Law Review 3, no. 2 (2020): 235–58.

Radha, Nadya Iswari Mannu, and Aryo Fadlian. “Kajian Yuridis Arbitrase Sebagai Suatu Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Luar Pengadilan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 8, no. 20 (2022): 249–57.

Rambe, Tamiarisa Amanda Fasa, Sunarmi Sunarmi, Mahmul Siregar, and Detania Sukarja. “Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Kota Medan Memeriksa Sengketa Konsumen Jasa Keuangan Pasca Terbentuknya Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan.” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2022, 109–16.

Schnabel, Timothy. “The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Framework for the Cross-Border Recognition and Enforcement of Mediated Settlements.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3239527.

Solikhin, Riyadus. “Perkembangan Dan Urgensi Penerapan Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdagangan Elektronik Di Indonesia.” Padjadjaran Law Review 11, no. 1 (2023): 65–79.

Spitz, Lidia. “Refusal of Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments on Public Policy Grounds in the Hague Judgments Convention – A Comparison with The 1958 New York Convention.” In Yearbook of Private International Law Vol. XXI - 2019/2020, 2021. https://doi.org/10.9785/9783504386962-016.

Sugiadnyana, Putu Radyati, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, and Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini. “Penyatuan Sengketa Pulau Batu Puteh Di Selat Johor Antara Singapura Dengan Malaysia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 2020.

Tilome, Apris Ara. “Sociological Implications of Social Exchange in Regional Head Elections in Gorontalo Province.” Journal La Sociale 3, no. 2 (2022): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v3i2.592.

Tutojo. “Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas, 2015.

Viktoriia, Panchenko, Kornieva Polina, and Cherevatenko Iryna. “Procedural Law Role In The International Commercial Arbitration: Some Remarks.” Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 5, no. 4 (2022): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.4-n000437.

William, King, and Moody Rizqy Syailendra. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Investasi Asing Melalui Arbitrase Internasional.” Journal of Education Research 4, no. 4 (2023): 1982–90.

Winarta, Frans Hendra. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Dan Internasional: Edisi Kedua. Sinar Grafika, 2022.

Yuliardi, Andika Dwi, and Imam Budi Santoso. “Upaya Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Didasarkan Adanya Kesepakatan Para Pihak.” Perspektif Hukum, 2022, 139–65. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v22i1.92.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.8404

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal USM LAW REVIEW : Journal Law published by Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.