Independence of The Honorary Board of Election Organizers After The Constitutional Court Decision No. 32/PUU-XIX/2021

Zaki Ulya, Fuadi Fuadi, Aldi Syah Putra

Abstract


This study aims to find out what the independence and integrity of the Honorary Board of Election Organisers (DKPP) are after the enactment of Constitutional Court Decision No. 32/PUU-XIX/2021. After the enactment of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 32/PUU-XIX/2021, DKPP experienced problems related to its independence, including limited authority, lack of independent supervisory functions, and rampant political intervention. All of these problems affect DKPP's role in carrying out its duties as a supervisor of election administrators. It is crucial to keep in mind that even with the changes in the DKPP's jurisdiction following the Constitutional Court's ruling, the organization's responsibility as a defender of morality and integrity in election administration is still crucial to maintaining a free, transparent, and democratic electoral process. This research uses normative juridical research methods, with a library research approach. To obtain secondary data related to this title so that valid and accountable data can be obtained, the approach used in this research is the statute approach. The findings of this research support the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 32/PUU-XIX/2023 which cancelled Article 458 paragraph (13) of Law No. 7/2017. This makes the decision of the Election Organiser Honour Council legally binding as a concrete, unique, and final decision made by a state administrative official, which can be challenged in the state administrative court. This decision has legal consequences because it confirms the final and binding nature of the Election Organiser Honour Council, which distinguishes it from judicial decisions; and opens up the possibility of testing the decision of the DKPP through the State Administrative Dispute procedure at the State Administrative Court.


Keywords


Indendence; the Honorary Board of Election; the Constitutional Court Decision No. 32/PUU-XIX/2021

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andriansyah, and Muthia’ah Maizaroh. “Rasionalisasi Putusan DKPP Sebagai Objek Pengujian Di PTUN.” Nomokrasi 1, no. 1 (2023): 56–67.

Angkasa, Nitaria, Yulia Kusuma Wardani, Zulkarnain, Yennie Agustin MR, Ali Faisal, Gunawan, Husni Mubaroq, and Maya Shafira. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Edited by M. Akib, Maroni, and Hamzah. I. Lampung: CV. Laduny Alifatama, 2019.

Anonimous. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Tegaskan DKPP Bukan Lembaga Peradilan.” Media Indonesia, 2022. https://epaper.mediaindonesia.com/detail/mahkamah-konstitusi-tegaskan-dkpp-bukan-lembaga-peradilan.

Arifatuzzahrah, Firda, and Irham Bashori Hasba. “Kepastian Hukum Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Penyelenggara Pemilu.” USM Law Review 7, no. 1 (2024): 70–83. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i1.7997.

Aspan, Zulkifli, and Wiwin Suwandi. “Analisis Final Dan Mengikat Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum.” Japhtn-Han 1, no. 1 (2022): 92–104. https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v1i1.28.

Asshidiqie, Jimly. Hukum Tata Negara Dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi : Serpihan Pemikiran Hukum, Media Dan HAM. Edited by Zainal A.M. Husein. Vol. 2. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2009. http://mitrahukum.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Pilar_Demokrasi.pdf.

Chakim, M. Lutfi. “Desain Institusional Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) Sebagai Peradilan Etik.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 2 (2016): 393–408. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk11210.

Dasopang, Agus Iptian. “Kajian Hukum Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Atas Sanksi Pemberhentian Anggota Penyelenggara Pemilu (Analisis Putusan Nomor 317-Pke-DKPP/X/2019).” Skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, 2021.

Disantara, Fradhana Putra, Bayu Dwi Anggono, and Aan Efendi. “Establishing Ethical Norms: Dignified Justice Theory Perspectives on Ethics and Legal Relations.” Rechtsidee 10, no. Juni (2022): 1–13.

Fahmi, Khairul, Feri Amsari, Busyra Azheri, and Muhammad Ichsan Kabullah. “Sistem Keadilan Pemilu Dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran Dan Sengketa Proses Pemilu Serentak 2019 Di Sumatera Barat Electoral Justice System in Handling 2019 Concurrent Election Violations and Disputes in West Sumatra.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 1 (2020): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1711.

Fendra, Harid, Indah Adi Putri, and Ria Ariany. “Analisis Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu.” Journal of Social and Policy Issues 2, no. 3 (2022): 120–29. https://doi.org/10.58835/jspi.v2i3.8.

Heri, Fauzi. “Spirit Baru Hubungan Kelembagaan Penyelenggara Pemilu.” Detik News, 2022. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-6018625/spirit-baru-hubungan-kelembagaan-penyelenggara-pemilu.

Ismail, Ismail, and Fakhris Lutfianto Hapsoro. “Paradigma Makna Final Dan Mengikat Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu.” Justitia et Pax 37, no. 2 (2021): 235–50. https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v37i2.4312.

Junaidi, Muhammad. “Pidana Pemilu Dan Pilkada Oleh Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 5, no. 2 (2020): 220–34. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i2.2631.

Lampung, Humas Bawaslu. “Bedah Putusan MK No.32/PUU-XIX/2021, Khoir: Putusan Ini Menjadi Langkah Baru Bagi Penyelenggara Pemilu.” Bawaslu Lampung, 2022. https://lampung.bawaslu.go.id/bedah-putusan-mk-no32puu-xix2021-khoir-putusan-ini-menjadi-langkah-baru-bagi-penyelenggara-pemilu/.

Leavy, Patricia. Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York: The Guilford Press, 2017. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results.

Muchlisin. “Konsep Independent Regulatory Agencies Dalam Kewenangan DKPP Sebagai Lembaga Peradilan Etik.” Tesis. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, 2021. https://doi.org/10.19105/asshahifah.v1i1.5883.

Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.

Nasef, M. Imam. “Studi Kritis Mengenai Kewenangan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Dalam Mengawal Electoral Integrity Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 21, no. 3 (2014): 378–401. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol21.iss3.art3.

Nasruddin, Nasruddin, Galang Asmara, and RR. Cahyowati. “Authority of General Election Commission for the Electoral Constitutional Rights.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 6, no. 6 (2019): 97–102. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i6.1197.

Nofan. “Pengujian Yudisial Putusan DKPP Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Peratu 6, no. 2 (2023): 203–28. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.622023.203-228.

Nurdin, Maharani. “Eksistensi Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) Dalam Penegakan Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu Di Kepulauan Riau.” Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 9, no. 7 (2022): 3293–3300. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v9i6.3014-3021.

Pahlevi, Indra. “Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia : Berbagai Permasalahannya.” Politica 2, no. 1 (2011): 45–72.

Pamungkas, Sigit. Perihal Pemilu. Laboratorium Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan Fisipol UGM. Cet. Perta. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2009.

Rahmatunnisa, Mudiyati, Siti Witianti, and Hendra Hendra. “Evaluasi Kinerja Dkpp Dalam Penanganan Kasus Pemilukada Serentak Jawa Barat Tahun 2015.” Jurnal Wacana Politik 2, no. 2 (2017): 148–55. https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v2i2.14419.

Ridwan, Jejen Fauzi. “Peranan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) Dalam Menegakkan Kemandirian, Integritas, Dan Kredibilitas Penyelenggara Pemilu Dalam Pemilu Kepala Daerah Dan Wakil Kepala Daerah Tahun 2015.” Journal of Politic and Government Studies 6, no. 4 (2017): 1–14.

Syaefudin, Muhammad, and Kadi Sukarna. “Kewenangan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu ( DKPP ) Dalam Menegakan Kode Etik Pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum.” Jurnal USM Law Review 1, no. 2 (2018): 104–20. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i1.2261.

Yuhandra, Erga, Iman Jalaluddin Rifa’i, Suwari Akhmaddhian, Haris Budiman, and Yani Andriyani. “Efektifitas Fungsi Pencegahan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Dalam Melakukan Pelanggaran Pemilu.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 8, no. 1 (2023): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i1.3015.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.8353

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal USM LAW REVIEW : Journal Law published by Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.