Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Bagi Pelaku Penipuan Phisning Berbasis Web
Abstract
This study aims to analyze legal arrangements related to vague phishing in order to answer legal problems, namely whether it is in accordance with the elements of justice which is a legal ideal. The research discusses that the current criminal law rules need to be changed to pay attention to all parties (victims and the community) to be restored to their situation based on the ITE Law. This research method is a normative juridical using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The study yielded 2 points: first; That the current criminal law is still oriented towards the old penal system in accordance with the theory of criminal retaliation which is aimed at the punishment of the perpetrator and the rights of the victim are ignored. Second; There is no criminal arrangement regarding compensation that concretely regulates the crime of phishing. The novelty in this study is that it complements studies conducted in previous studies that only provide imprisonment for perpetrators as a form of compensation from the perpetrator and there is no personal responsibility from the perpetrator to return material losses suffered by the victim.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan hukum terkait dengan phising yang kabur agar dapat menjawab permasalahan hukum yaitu apakah sudah sesuai dengan unsur keadilan yang merupakan suatu cita-cita hukum. Penelitian membahas bahwa aturan hukum pidana saat ini perlu diadakan perubahan agar memperhatikan semua pihak (korban dan masyarakat) untuk dapat dikembalikan keadaannya berdasarkan UU ITE. Metode penelitian ini merupakan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian ini menghasilkan 2 poin: pertama; bahwa aturan hukum pidana saat ini masih berorientasi pada sistem pemidanaan lama sesuai dengan teori pembalasan pidana yang tertuju kepada hukuman pelaku tersebut dan hak atas korban terabaikan. Kedua; tidak ada pengaturan pidana mengenai ganti rugi yang mengatur secara konkret tindak pidana phising tersebut. Kebaharuan dalam penelitian ini yaitu melengkapi studi yang dilakukan pada penelitian sebelumnya yang hanya memberikan pidana penjara terhadap pelaku sebagai bentuk hukuman ganti kerugian dari si pelaku dan tidak ada pertanggungjawaban pribadi dari pelaku untuk mengembalikan kerugian secara materiil yang dialami oleh korban.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aldriano, Muhammad Anthony, and Mas Agus Priyambodo. “Cyber Crime Dalam Sudut Pandang Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 1 (2022): 2169–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v6i1.2947.
Armour, Marilyn. “‘Restorative Justice: Some Facts and History.’” Tikkun 27, no. 1 (2012). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/08879982-2012-1012.
Artadi, Ibnu. “Menggugat Efektivitas Penerapan Pidana Penjara Pendek Menuju Suatu Proses Peradilan Yang Humanis.” Jurnal Hukum pro Justitia, 2006.
Butarbutar, Elisabeth Nurhaini. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: refika aditama, 2018.
Devy irmawanti, Noveria, and Barda Nawawi Arief. “Urgensi Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 2 (2021): 217–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i2.217-227.
Diniyah, Khanifah Jannatul. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Cyber Crime Phishing.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Dinamika 28, no. 5 (2022).
Efendi, A’an, and Fradhana Putra Disantara. “Post Conditionally Unconstitutional of Job Creation Law: Quo Vadis Legal Certainty?” Yuridika 37, no. 2 (2022): 345–82. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i2.33364.
Effendi, Erdianto. “Penjatuhan Pidana Ganti Rugi Sebagai Pidana Pokok Dalam Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda.” Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 2 (2022): 617–32. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i2.5355.
Gulo, Ardi Saputra, Sahuri Lasmadi, and Khabib Nawawi. “Cyber Crime Dalam Bentuk Phising Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik.” PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 1, no. 2 (2021): 68–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i2.9574.
Gunarto, Marcus Priyo. “Asas Keseimbangan Dalam Konsep Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Mimbar Hukum 24, no. 1 (2012): 83–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16143.
Gunawan, T.J. Keseimbangan Nilai Pidana Penjara Dan Pidana Denda Perspektif Penology Melalui Pendekatan Analisis Ekonomi. Jakarta: kencana, 2022.
Harmono, Dwi, Kadi Sukarna, Diah Sulistyani, and Muhammad Junaidi. “Kewajiban Pelaporan Harta Kekayaan Bagi Penyelenggara Negara.” Jurnal USM Law Review 3, no. 2 (2020): 296–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i2.2823.
Hidayat, Arif, and Zaenal Arifin. “Politik Hukum Legislasi Sebagai Socio-Equilibrium Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 4, no. 2 (2019): 147–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1654.
Indah, Maya. Perlindungan Korban: Suatu Perspektif Viktimologi Dan Kriminologi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
J. Insole, Christopher. Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law. New York: oxford university, 2020.
Juita, Subaidah Ratna, Amri Panahatan Sihotang, and Supriyadi Supriyadi. “Penerapan Prinsip Individualisasi Pidana Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Perpajakan.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 5, no. 2 (2020): 271–85. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i2.1938.
Kamran, Muhammad, and Maskun Maskun. “Penipuan Dalam Jual Beli Online: Perspektif Hukum Telematika.” Balobe Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2021): 41–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v1i1.501.
Kurniawati, Husni, and Yunanto Yunanto. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi Debitur Dalam Aktivitas Pinjaman Online.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 7, no. 1 (2022): 102–14. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i1.4290.
Laksana, Andri Winjaya. “Pemidanaan Cybercrime Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Positif.” Jurnal Hukum Unissula 35, no. 1 (2019): 52–76. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jh.v35i1.11044.
Lestari, Rohmini Indah, and Zaenal Arifin. “Godaan Praktik Binary Option Berkedok Investasi Dan Trading.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 7, no. 1 (2022): 19–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i1.4875.
Liebling, Alison. “Prisons in Transition.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 29, no. 5 (2006): 422–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.03.002.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana prenada media group, 2013.
Nawawi Arief, Barda. Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan Dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra aditya bakti, 1998.
Priyonggojati, Agus. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penerima Pinjaman Dalam Penyelenggaraan Financial Technology Berbasis Peer To Peer Lending.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 2, no. 2 (2019): 162–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i2.2268.
Putra Y, Vikran Fasyadhiyaksa. “Modus Operandi Tindak Pidana Phising Menurut UU ITE.” Jurist-Diction 4, no. 6 (2021): 2525–48.
Rahmanto, Tony Yuri. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Berbasis Transaksi Elektronik.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 1 (2019): 31–52. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.31-52.
Riyadi, Sugeng. “Efektifitas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengelolaan Dan Pemberdayaan Zakat Dalam Rangka Mengentaskan Kemiskinan.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 1, no. 2 (2019): 121–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i1.2262.
Setiyawan, Wahyu Beny Mukti, Erifendi Churniawan, and Femmy Silaswaty Faried. “Upaya Regulasi Teknologi Informasi Dalam Menghadapi Serangan Siber Guna Menjaga Kedaulatan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal USM Law Review 3, no. 2 (2020): 275–95. https://doi.org/https://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/julr/article/download/2773/1814.
Sitompul, Josua. Cyberspace, Cybercrime, Cyberlaw, Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Tatanusa, 2012.
Sunarso, Siswanto. Viktimologi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar grafika, 2014.
Supanto. Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Ekonomi Dalam Menghadapi Perkembangan Globalisasi Ekonomi. Surakarta: UNS Press, 2015.
———. “Perkembangan Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime) Dan Antisipasinya Dengan Penal Policy.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 1 (2016): 52–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8718.
Suratman, and Phillips Dilla. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.
Suryawati, Nany, and Martika Dini Syaputri. “Harmonization of the Application of Customary Law and Positive Law in Village Communities of Malang Regency.” International Journal of Applied Business and International Management 6, no. 2 (2021): 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v6i2.993.
Vega, Jesus. “Legal Philosophy as Practical Philosophy.” Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law 34 (2018): 67–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.3859.
Wahid, Abdul. “Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 7, no. 2 (2022): 307–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i2.5793.
Wahid, Abdul, and Mohammad Labib. Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime). Bandung: pt refika aditama, 2010.
Wahyudi, Dheny. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan Cyber Crime Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi 4, no. 1 (2013): 98–113.
Wibowo, Mia Haryati, and Nur Fatimah. “Ancaman Phishing Terhadap Pengguna Sosial Media Dalam Dunia Cyber Crime.” JoEICT (Journal of Education And ICT) 1, no. 1 (2017): 1–5. https://jurnal.stkippgritulungagung.ac.id/index.php/joeict/article/view/69.
Widiatama, Widiatama, Hadi Mahmud, and Suparwi Suparwi. “Ideologi Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Membangun Negara Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal USM Law Review 3, no. 2 (2020): 310–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i2.2774.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6649
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal USM LAW REVIEW : Journal Law published by Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
