Comparative Roles of Mediators in Non-Litigation Dispute Resolution: Indonesia and Thailand

Abdulloh Tsani Harahap; Zainuddin Zainuddin

doi:10.26623/julr.v9i1.13819

Authors

Abdulloh Tsani Harahap Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Zainuddin Zainuddin Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v9i1.13819

Keywords:

Alternative Dispute Resolution, Comparative Law, Dispute Resolution, Mediation

Abstract

This study aims to comparatively analyze the role of mediators in non-litigation dispute resolution in Indonesia and Thailand and to examine how differences in legal and sociological orientations influence mediation effectiveness. Existing mediation studies predominantly focus on procedural or institutional aspects, leaving a limited understanding of how mediator positioning as legal and social actors affects dispute resolution outcomes. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and comparative law approaches, supported by the analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and scholarly literature. The findings reveal that Indonesia adopts a formal and legalistic mediation model in which mediators function as certified facilitators to ensure legal certainty and enforceability, but with relatively limited social acceptance. In contrast, Thailand applies a community-based mediation model that positions mediators as socially legitimate actors capable of fostering trust and voluntary compliance, although with weaker formal legal guarantees. This study contributes to mediation scholarship by conceptualizing mediators as hybrid legal–social institutions whose effectiveness depends on balancing juridical authority and social legitimacy. The findings imply that developing an integrative mediation framework combining legal certainty with sociological legitimacy is essential to strengthen the effectiveness, accessibility, and sustainability of non-litigation dispute resolution systems.

References

Adolf, Huala. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional, 2020.

Arifin, Miftah, Zaenal Arifin, and Mac Thi Hoai Thuong. “The Principle of Proportionality on Digital Business Agreements: Between Mitigation and Orientation.” Indonesia Private Law Review 4, no. 1 (2023): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2954.

Arifin, Zaenal, Soegianto Soegianto, and Diah Sulistyani RS. “Perlindungan Hukum Perjanjian Kemitraan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Pada Bidang Konstruksi.” Jurnal USM Law Review 3, no. 1 (2020): 59–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i1.2134.

Aristo, Erly, Karen Michaelia Arifin, and Shenny Rustam Moidady. “Establishment of Special Land Courts as an Effort to Settlement of Land Cases” 8 (2023): 450–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i3.7837.

Cahyani, Tinuk Dwi, and Fauzan Saputra. “Enhancing Mediation Skills through Legal Counseling for Indonesian Citizens in Thailand : A Case Study of PCIM Thailand” 5, no. 1 (2025): 49–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22219/jdh.v5i1.39222.

Datumula, Sarfika. “Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Luar Pengadilan” 3 (2023). https://doi.org/https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative Mediasi.

Febriyanti, Siti Nur Umariyah. “Tinjauan Filosofis Terhadap Mediasi Di Luar Pengadilan Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa,” 2025.

Fila Asmara, Callesta Aydelwais De, Zaenal Arifin, and Fahruddin Mubarok Anwar. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Cipta Antara Pencipta Lagu Dan Penyanyi.” Jurnal USM Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 860. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i2.7499.

Fitriyadi, Ahmad Adi. “Urgensi Pembentukan Association Of Southeast Asian Nations Court Of Justice (Pengadilan Asean) Sebagai Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Internasional Regional Untuk Menanggulangi Berbagai Sengketa Di Asia Tenggara,” 2025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33477/thk.v16i2.1649.

Hsb, Putra Halomoan. “Manajemen Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syari’ah Putra,” 2021, 269–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24952/tad.v2i2.3293.

Irwan. “Alternative Land Dispute Resolution Outside the Court Through Mediation” 15, no. 02 (2025): 440–47. https://doi.org/10.58471/justi.v15i02.

Kamilia, Nur, Eriz Rizqiyatul, Isqi Dzurriyyatus Sa, Aden Rosadi, Sri Yuniarti, Seilla Nur, Amalia Firdaus, et al. “Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam,” 2024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33650/jhi.

Kasim, Nur Mohamad, and Fibriyanti Karim. “The Impact of Mediation on the Settlement of Divorce Cases in Religious Courts Jurnal Ius Constituendum.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 10, no. 2 (2025): 11–21. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i1.10912.

Monika Gultom, Agnes, Hisar Siregar, and Ria Juliana Siregar. “Legal Review of Settlement of Customary Land Disputes Through Mediation According to Positive Law.” Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics 4, no. 1 (2025): 109–18. https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v4i1.13656.

Mulyanto, Akh, Suparno. “Reforming the Land Boundary Dispute Resolution Mechanism Based on Mediation for Legal Certainty and Social Sustainability.” Jurnal Greenation Sosial Dan Politik 3, no. 4 (2025): 836–46.

Nahda, Sonia, Emy Hajar Abra, and Pristika Handayani. “Pelaksanaan Mediasi Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Implementation of Mediation Based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Year 2016 on Mediation Procedure” 8, no. 3 (2025): 7–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.12696.

Nurlani, Meirina. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan 3, no. 1 (2021): 30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32502/khdk.v3i1.4519.

Putra, Aista Wisnu, Ro’fah Setyowati, Hendro Saptono, and Rahandy Rizki Prananda. “OnlineDispute Resolution(ODR) Dalam Sengketa Investasi Pasar Modal Syariah Di Indonesia.” Jurnal USM Law Review 3, no. 2 (2021): 235–58. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i2.2707.

Rini Eka Agustina. “Efektivitas Arbitrase Sebagai Penyelesaian Perselisihan.” Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary 2, no. 1 (2024): 263–72. https://doi.org/10.61292/eljbn.130.

Rizqian, Syahrul, and Putu Ade Martana Harriestha. “Kedudukan Mediator Dalam Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembagian Harta Peninggalan.” Jurnal Kertha Wicara Vol 11, no. 06 (2022): 1319–30. https://doi.org/DOI: KW.2022.v11.i06.p13.

Romana, Francisca, and Meicke Caroline. “Studi Komparatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia Dan Thailand,” 2022, 371–91. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art7.

Sasmiar, Sasmiar, Umar Hasan, and Suhermi Suhermi. “Legal Certainty of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mediation.” Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 14, no. 1 (2024): 25–44. https://doi.org/10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v14i1.33432.

Sri Anggraini Kusuma Dewi. “Legal Arrangements Regarding Dispute Resolution Through Mediation In Civil Cases.” Yurisdiksi : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains 20, no. 1 (2024): 66–72. https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v20i1.230.

Telaumbanua, Dalinama. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam Yang Dilakukan Di Luar Pengadilan” 1, no. 1 (2021): 1–4. https://doi.org/https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/341566-penyelesaian-sengketa-perjanjian-pinjam-460600de.pdf.

Yoesry, Erni. “Effectiveness of Commercial Mediation in Resolution of Transnational Business Disputes : A Comparative Analysis of Legal Frameworks” 1, no. 3 (2025): 114–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56107/penalaw.v2i2.185.