Vague Norms of Population Density in Land Control Regulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v9i1.13208Keywords:
Agrarian Reform , Land Restrictions , Legal Certainty , Legal Reform , Population DensityAbstract
This study aims to examine the vagueness of population density criteria stipulated in Article 3 paragraph (3) of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN) No. 18 of 2016 and to formulate a normative reformulation that ensures legal certainty in agricultural land ownership restrictions. The core legal problem lies in the absence of explicit quantitative parameters defining “dense” and “non-dense” areas, which renders the regulation difficult to implement and prone to subjective administrative discretion. Employing normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach, this study analyzes the internal coherence of agrarian regulations and evaluates their compatibility with the principle of lex certa. The analysis reveals that the reliance on outdated qualitative demographic classifications, originating from population standards of the 1960s, is no longer responsive to contemporary demographic dynamics and has generated legal uncertainty as well as risks of land ownership concentration. The novelty of this research lies in proposing an operational and prescriptive legal construction that integrates objective population density ratios (persons per km²), based on official data from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS), into the regulatory framework. This quantitative approach replaces elastic qualitative labels with measurable indicators, thereby strengthening transparency, consistency, and enforceability of land control policies. The findings confirm that the absence of numerical benchmarks constitutes a legal loophole that undermines agrarian justice and weakens state control over land ownership. Consequently, the study concludes that reformulating Article 3 paragraph (3) through the incorporation of objective demographic parameters is essential to enhance legal certainty, prevent land monopolization, and reinforce equitable land governance in Indonesia.
References
Abellia, Deswita. Mengenal Asas Legalitas Sebagai Fondasi Keadilan Pidana. General. September 30, 2025. https://www.hukumku.id/post/asas-legalitas/.
Ambuwaru, Jesse Heber, Bintan R. Saragih, and Listyowati Sumanto. “The Politics of Land Law and the Implementation of the Agrarian Reform Program in Indonesia’.” International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) 3, no. 5 (2023): 1443–50. https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas.v3i5.1013.
Arisaputra, Muhammad Ilham. Reforma Agraria di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika (Bumi Aksara), 2021.
Aristo, Erly, Karen Michaelia Arifin, and Shenny Rustam Moidady. “Establishment of Special Land Courts as an Effort to Settlement of Land Cases.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 8, no. 3 (2023): 450–65. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i3.7837.
Ayuni, Qurrata. “Optimizing Land Use Laws: A Comprehensive Revision of Law No. 56 of 1960 on Agricultural Land Area.” Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (2023): 205–22. https://doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v3i2.22487.
Baharuddin, A. Muin Farmal, Ma’ruf Hafidz, and Abdul Qahar. “The Essence Of The State’s Right To Control Land For People’s Prosperity According To Article 33 Of The 1945 Constitution.” Veredas Do Direito 22, no. 2 (2025): e223291. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n2.3291.
Contributor, Doran. “Mengenal One Map Policy Dan Dampaknya Di Indonesia.” Doran.Id, September 6, 2024. https://doran.id/one-map-policy/.
Gunawan, Gunawan. “Penerapan Ketentuan Landreform Dalam Rangka Pelaksanaan Reforma Agraria Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Petani Di Indonesia.” Pemuliaan Hukum 2, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.30999/jph.v2i2.1022.
Hanafi, Wildan Mahmud, and Suratman. “Agricultural Land Control Based on the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/ Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2016 Concerning Control of Agricultural Land Tenure.” Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 5, no. 4 (2025): 2720–32. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1617.
Humas BRIN. “BRIN Ungkap Sektor Pertanian Tumbuh Stagnan di Bawah 3 Persen dalam 25 Tahun Terakhir.” brin.go.id, 2024. https://brin.go.id/ortkpekm/posts/kabar/brin-ungkap-sektor-pertanian-tumbuh-stagnan-di-bawah-3-persen-dalam-25-tahun-terakhir.
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori Dan Metode Penelitian Hukum. Malang: Bayu Media Publishing, 2012.
Julian, Vanessa. “Penerapan Asas Latifundia Atas Penguasaan Tanah Pertanian Berdasarkan Nilai Keadilan.” Universitas Sriwijaya, 2023. https://repository.unsri.ac.id/129636/2/RAMA_74102_02022682125035_0011116302_01_front_ref.pdf.
Khudori, Mulyono Makmur and Sadar Subagyo. Mengarusutamakan (Kembali) Pembangunan Pertanian. Fadli Zon Library Kerjasama dengan Himpunan Kerukunan TaniIndonesia (HKTI), 2024. http://fadlizonlibrary.com/files/HKTI.pdf.
Lubis, Mira Ardilla, Muhammad Fajar Abdilla, and Siti Sardiana Berutu. “Reformasi Agraria Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Perekonomian Indonesia Pada Era Orde Lama Dan Orde Baru.” Analisis Sejarah: Mencari Jalan Sejarah 14, no. 2 (2024): 47–52. https://doi.org/10.25077/jas.v14i2.125.
Mariane, Irene, Listyowati Sumanto, Ignatius Pradipa Probondaru, and Siti Hafsyah Binti Idris. “Problems of Converting Agricultural Land and the Need to Anticipate Its Control After the Enactment of the Job Creation Law.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, June 30, 2024, 177–98. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10473.
Marwiyah, Marwiyah, Sri Mulyani, and Rudi Mulyanto. “The Effectiveness Of The Absentee Land Ban In Realizing Social Justice For Farmers.” Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum 24, no. 1 (2025): 5784–805. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6100.
Marzuki, Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2017.
Nuirhayati, Nurhayati. “Pelaksanaan Redistribusi Tanah Obyek Landreform Di Kecamatan Semarang Barat Kota Semarang.” Masters, Universitas Diponegoro, 2006. https://eprints.undip.ac.id/15762/.
Nur, Zulfahmi. “Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum (Refleksi Kajian Filsafat Hukum Dalam Pemikiran Hukum Imam Syâtibî).” Misykat al-Anwar Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Masyarakat 6, no. 2 (2023): 2. https://doi.org/10.24853/ma.6.2.247-272.
Putra, Johans Kadir, and Maulidia Rani. “Harmonization Of Regulations On Agricultural Land Restrictions For Farmers In Land Reform Program.” Jurnal De Jure 13, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.36277/jurnaldejure.v13i2.546.
Redi, Ahmad. Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.
Rizkiyanti, Rani. “Kedudukan Hukum Pemegang Hak Milik Atas Tanah Pertanian Yang Melebihi Batas Maksimum.” Perspektif: Kajian Masalah Hukum Dan Pembangunan 23, no. 3 (2018): 162–75. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v23i3.663.
Rongiyati, Sulasi. “Land Reform Melalui Penetapan Luas Tanah Pertanian (Kajian Yuridis Terhadap UU No. 56/Prp/ Tahun 1960 Tentang Penetapan Luas Tanah Pertanian).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan 4, no. 1 (2016): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v4i1.200.
Roqy, Barizy. “Tinjauan Yuridis Larangan Kepemilikan Tanah Secara Absentee Sebagaimana Diatur Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.” Thesis, Universitas Abdurrachman Saleh, 2024. https://repository.unars.ac.id/id/eprint/3271/.
Sangsun, Florianus Sp. Tata Cara Mengurus Sertifikat Tanah : Dasar Hukum Pendaftaran Tanah, Jenis-Jenis Sertifikat Tanah, Proses Pendaftaran Tanah. Visimedia, 2007. https://dpk.kepriprov.go.id/opac/detail/j7hzy.
Sari, Embun, Muhammad Yamin, Hasim Purba, and Rosnidar Sembiring. “Politik Hukum Pengadaan Tanah Terhadap Tanah Abrasi Pasca Diberlakukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 7, no. 1 (2022): 50–67. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i1.4390.
Slamet, Amalul Arifin. “Problems Of The Maximum Limits Of Land Tenure In Indonesia.” JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) 10, no. 2 (2022): 42. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v10i2.6894.
Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.
Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina, and A’an Efendi. Penelitian Hukum: Legal Research. Edited by Maya Sari. Cetakan 1. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.
Umam, Khatibul. “Eksistensi Larangan Kepemilikan Tanah Secara Latifundia Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Agraria Nomor 18 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengendalian Penguasaan Tanah Pertanian (Studi di Desa Sejati Kabupaten Sampang).” Universitas Islam Malang, 2020. http://repository.unisma.ac.id/handle/123456789/1803.
Wahyuni, Willa. “Begini Aturan Batas Maksimal Kepemilikan Tanah di Indonesia.” hukumonline.com, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/begini-aturan-batas-maksimal-kepemilikan-tanah-di-indonesia-lt659d5734514e3/.
Zaelani, Muhammmad Aziz, Wahyu Beny Mukti Setiyawan, and Fery Dona. “Mewujudkan Pendaftaran Tanah Yang Responsif Pada Era Disrupsi Sebagai Penunjang Kesejahteraan Rakyat.” Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 342–56. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4877.
Zamil, Yusuf Saepul, Farina Firda Eprilia, Hendri Firdaus, Triadi Maharso, and Nursyah Rizal. “Pemberantasan Mafia Tanah Di Indonesia: Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum Bagi Pemilik Tanah.” Jurnal USM Law Review 7, no. 3 (2024): 1305–22. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.10239.
Zefanya, Audry, and Fransiscus Xaverius Arsin Lukman. “Tolak Ukur Pemenuhan Penguasaan Fisik Atas Tanah Melalui Surat Pernyataan Penguasaan Fisik Bidang Tanah.” Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 2 (2022): 441–54. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i2.4878.
Zulyanti, Mutiara, Zuriatin Zuriatin, Syahbuddin Syahbuddin, and A. Gafar Hidayat. “Dampak Kebijakan Agraria Pemerintah Kolonial Belanda Terhadap Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi Petani Di Pulau Jawa, 1870-1940.” Fajar Historia: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah Dan Pendidikan 9, no. 2 (2025): 336–49. https://doi.org/10.29408/fhs.v9i2.31774.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
Citedness in Scopus 
