From Compliance to Cultural Outcomes: Rethinking Mandatory CSR in Bali
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v9i1.13150Keywords:
Cultural tourism, Ius constitutum, Ius operatum, TJSL/CSR, UtilitarianismAbstract
This study aims to evaluate whether the legal framework governing Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility (TJSL/CSR) in Bali has been effectively designed and implemented to maximize public and cultural welfare, or whether it remains confined to administrative compliance. Using a juridical-normative method informed by a utilitarian evaluation framework, this research examines the normative foundations of TJSL under the Company Law of 2007, Government Regulation No. 47 of 2012, and Law No. 15 of 2023 (ius constitutum), as well as their operationalization through Bali Provincial Regulation No. 8 of 2023 and Governor Regulation No. 46 of 2023 (ius operatum). The analysis demonstrates that, although the national legal framework provides sufficient authority for regional governments to coordinate and direct TJSL toward culture-based public welfare, its implementation in Bali remains predominantly input-oriented and administrative. The findings identify a significant utility gap, manifested in the absence of standardized cultural outcome indicators, outcome-based public reporting, independent verification mechanisms, and performance-based incentives or sanctions. As a result, TJSL policies have not been able to optimally translate corporate social resources into measurable benefits for key sectors of Balinese welfare, such as the strengthening of customary institutions, the preservation of ritual landscapes, and the transmission of traditional knowledge. The novelty of this study lies in its outcome-oriented evaluation of TJSL policy through a utilitarian lens, bridging normative legal analysis with public policy assessment. The study further proposes a direction for policy reconstruction that aligns TJSL implementation with cultural indicators mandated under Provincial Regulations No. 4 of 2020 and No. 5 of 2020, thereby repositioning TJSL as an effective instrument for cultural sustainability and public welfare rather than mere procedural compliance.
References
Aguinis, H. & Glavas, A. “What We Know and Don’t Know About CSR Outcomes.” Journal of Management, 2021. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/01492063211023956.
Baker, S. “Cultural Governance and Policy Effectiveness.” International Journal of Cultural Policy, 2020. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2020.1813764.
Carroll, A. B. “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of the Concept & Future Directions.” Business & Society, 2021. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/00076503211001788.
Ching, K. W. “Mandatory CSR: Comparative Lessons for Indonesia.” Company and Securities Law Journal, 2021. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3990112.
Dyck, A. & Zingales, L. “The Corporate Governance Role of the Public Interest.” Journal of Finance, 2020. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12877.
Eom, S. “Outcome-Based Regulatory Design in Public Policy.” Regulation & Governance, 2023. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/rego.12523.
Fischer, F. “Policy Evaluation and the Public Interest.” Public Administration Review, 2023. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/puar.13623.
Hall, C. Michael. “Sustainable Tourism: Governance, Culture, and Policy Evaluation.” Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2023. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2023.2176244.
Husted, B. W., & de Sousa-Filho, J. M. “Mandatory CSR and Public Value Creation: Evidence from Emerging Economies.” Journal of Business Ethics 185, no. 4 (2024): 875–94. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-06100-2.
Jamali, D. & Karam, C. “CSR and Development: Synergies and Contradictions.” Journal of Business Ethics, 2021. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04566-2.
Kamal, M. “Decentralization, Local Law, and Public Welfare in Southeast Asia.” Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2021. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/17516234.2021.1954127.
Khan, M. et al. “Regulatory CSR Mandates and Corporate Behavior in Developing Countries.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129670.
Krisnaningrum, N. P. A., & Budiasih, I. G. N. “Implementation of CSR Based on Tri Hita Karana in LPD Kesiman.” E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 31, no. 7 (2021). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.24843/EJA.2021.v31.i07.p17.
Kustina, K. T., & Arisanti, L. P. M. “Tri Hita Karana CSR and Financial/Community Welfare Outcomes.” Juara: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi 12, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.36733/juara.v12i2.3516.
Liu, J. et al. “Cultural Sustainability and Tourism Policy.” Sustainability, 2021. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.3390/su13094870.
Mahyuni, I. G. N., & Dewi, L. P. A. G. T. “Corporate Social Responsibility, Local Wisdom of Tri Hita Karana, and Community-Based Tourism Development.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis 18, no. 2 (2022): 203–215. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/jieb.v18i2.5803.
Moon, J., & Knudsen, J. S. “Governmentalization of Corporate Social Responsibility: Policy Tools and Outcomes.” Regulation & Governance 18, no. 2 (2024): 295–314. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/rego.12587.
Mulgan, T. “Future Generations and Utilitarian Ethics.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2022. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1007/s10677-022-10342-0.
Pancawati, N. L. P. A. “Tri Hita Karana-Based CSR: How Corporate Programs Reflect Local Values.” Valid: Jurnal Ilmiah 20, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.53512/valid.v20i1.268.
Purnami, A. A. S., Selamet, I. K., & Sudarmini, K. “‘SWOT Analysis of CSR Strategies in LPDs.’” Wacana Ekonomi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi 18, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.22225/we.18.2.1161.75-81.
Purwanti, L., Cahyana, P. G., & Ibrahim, M. “Exploration of the Tri Parartha Concept in CSR Programs Based on Tri Hita Karana.” JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi) 9, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.23887/jia.v9i1.77171.
Rahman, S. “CSR Compliance in Asia: Legal Obligations vs Voluntary Norms.” Asian Journal of Law and Society, 2020. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/als.2020.4.
Scanlon, T. M., & Mulgan, T. “Utilitarianism and Public Policy Evaluation.” Ethics 135, no. 5 (2024): 457–80. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1086/725029.
Scherer, A. G. “CSR in the Age of Globalization.” Academy of Management Review, 2021. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.5465/amr.2017.0478.
Sitiari, N. W., Datrini, L. K., Sarmawa, W. G., & Setini, M. “Empowering Eco-Tourism MSMEs through Tri Hita Karana Values.” Journal of Finance and Business Digital, 3(3) 3, no. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.55927/jfbd.v3i3.11621.
Su, L., Huang, S., & Pearce, P. “Cultural Sustainability, Tourism Governance, and Corporate Responsibility.” Tourism Management 100, no. 1 (2024): 104472. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104472.
Susanti, C., & Wiryanata, I. G. N. A. “Hotel CSR and Tri Hita Karana Practices.” Pariwisata Budaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Pariwisata Agama Dan Budaya, 9(1), 2024 9, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.25078/pariwisata.v9i1.3556.
Sutapa, I. N., Miati, N. L. P. M., & Aryasa, I. P. G. G. C. “The Influence of the Application of Sustainability Accounting Principles in Ecotourism Activities in Bali with the Concept of Tri Hita Karana.” ” International Journal of Social Science, 3(2). 3, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.53625/ijss.v3i2.6373.
Zamir, E. & Medina, B. “Law, Morality, and the Public Interest: A Behavioral Perspective on Utilitarianism.” Journal of Legal Analysis, 2021. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1093/jla/laab004.
Zhang, Y., & Xiao, H. “CSR, Local Culture, and Destination Competitiveness.” Annals of Tourism Research 103, no. 1 (2025): 103534. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2024.103534.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.


Citedness in Scopus 

