Transnational Enforcement Through the Indonesia–Singapore Extradition Framework Against Corruption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.13066Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of the Indonesia–Singapore extradition framework as a transnational law enforcement mechanism in combating corruption crimes with cross-border dimensions. The research is motivated by Indonesia’s longstanding challenges in recovering fugitives and assets located in Singapore, despite the existence of bilateral agreements and mutual legal assistance arrangements. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes the extradition treaty, implementing regulations, relevant case practices, and principles of international cooperation in criminal matters. The findings reveal that while the extradition framework provides a formal legal basis for cooperation, its practical implementation remains constrained by differences in legal systems, evidentiary standards, dual criminality requirements, and political considerations that may delay or impede extradition processes. Moreover, the effectiveness of extradition is closely linked to asset recovery mechanisms, which are not always synchronized with extradition procedures. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated analysis of extradition and transnational asset recovery within a single enforcement framework, highlighting the need for stronger procedural coordination and institutional synergy. This study recommends strengthening treaty implementation through clearer operational guidelines, enhanced mutual trust between law enforcement agencies, and closer alignment between extradition and asset recovery mechanisms to ensure effective, timely, and accountable transnational enforcement against corruption.
References
Abdussalam. Hukum Pidana Internasional I. Disunting oleh Tim Agung. 1 ed. Vol. 1. Jakarta: Restu Agung, 2006.
Aksa, Aksa, Alwan Hadiyanto, and Ciptono Ciptono. "Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang oleh Pusat Pelaporan Dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan Melalui Kerjasama Internasional Anti-Money-Laundering Efforts by the Financial Transaction Reporting and Analysis Centre Through International Cooperation." Jurnal USM Law Review Vol 7.2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.8896
Al-Kavafi, M. Imdad, Ja'far Baehaqi, and Maskur Rosyid. "Urgensi Perampasan Aset Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi: Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam." Jurnal USM Law Review 8.2 (2025): 952-977. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.11057
Atmasasmita, Romli. Pengantar Hukum Pidana Internasional. Vol. 1. Bandung: PT. Eresco, 1995.
Balashov, Rakhmatulla, Oxana Filipets, and Svetlana Baimoldina. "Recovery of stolen assets from abroad." International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics 15.5 (2023): 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESDF.2023.133188.
CNN Indonesia. “Daftar Koruptor yang Sempat Kabur ke Singapura.” 26 Januari 2022. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220126103706-12-751365/daftar-koruptor-yang-sempat-kabur-ke-singapura/1.
Fauzin, Fauzin. “Efektifitas Ekstradisi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Rechtidee 16, no. 1 (30 Juni 2021): 146–47. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v16i1.10501.
Hamzah, Andi. Korupsi Di Indonesia: Masalah dan Pemecahannya. Vol. 2. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia, 1986.
Jawa, Dominikus, Parningotan Malau, and Ciptono Ciptono. "Tantangan dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia." Jurnal USM Law Review 7.2 (2024): 1006-1017. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9507
Jean Luc, Kizito Cimanuka. "Principle of Sovereign Equality And Non-Interference In The Internal Affairs of A State." Tirtayasa Journal of International Law 1.1 (2022): 59-75. https://dx.doi.org/10.51825/tjil.v1i1.15772.
Kridasaksana, Doddy. Hukum Ekstradisi. Vol. 1. Semarang: Semarang University Press, 2012.
Mahayasa, I. “Perjanjian Ekstradisi Antara Indonesia Dan Singapura Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Pelarian Koruptor Indonesia Di Singapura.” Brawijaya Law Student Journal 1, no. 10 (15 Januari 2014): 6.
Moyo, Monica P. "Final Report on the Obligation to Extradite or Prosecute (Aut Dedere Aut Judicare)(Int’l L. Comm’n)." International Legal Materials 54.4 (2015): 758-779. https://doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.54.4.0758.
Muchlis, Ahmad. "Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Pelindungan Hukum Pekerja Migran Indonesia Di Arab Saudi Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Dengan Ancaman Pidana Mati." Jurnal USM Law Review 8.2 (2025): 1006-1031. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.11767
Mulyadi, Lilik. “Fungsi Hukum Pidana Internasional Dihubungkan Dengan Kejahatan Transnasional Khususnya Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Aceh Utara, 2008.
Nazmi, N., & Hayati, F. (2023). Urgensitas Perjanjian Ekstradisi Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum Pidana. https://doi.org/10.18592/jils.v7i1.9531
Oezdil, Elvan Beguem. "Reimagining International Dispute Settlement: The Role of Extradition in Criminal Law." Yonsei LJ 15 (2025): 29.
Porter, Doug, et al. "Managing public finance and procurement in fragile and conflicted settings." International Public Management Journal 14.4 (2011): 369-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2011.656049.
Putra, Irwan Sapta, dan Yunawati Karlina. “Perjanjian Ekstradisi Antara Indonesia Dengan Singapura Di Tinjau Dari Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (13 Juli 2022): 330. https://doi.org/10.46306/rj.v2i2.44.
Qurnia, N. (2024). Penerapan dan Implikasi Perjanjian yang dibuat Antara Pemerintah Republik Indonesia dan Pemerintah Republik Singapura tentang Ekstradisi Buronan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2023. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 5(2), 1412–1423. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3259
Reus-Smit, Christian. "Power, legitimacy, and order." The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7.3 (2014): 341-359. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pou035.
Riyadi, Eko, Mahrus Ali, Anang Zubaidy, dan Syarif Nurhidayat. Korupsi Sebagai Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia: Tawaran Perpektif. Vol. 1. Yogyakarta: PUSHAM UII, 2019.
Ryana, Pricilia, dan Aisy Idzati. “Korupsi Dalam Kajian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Lex Scientia Law Review 2, no. 2 (7 Desember 2018): 179. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v2i2.27583.
Sadono, Bambang, Ali Lubab, Zaenal Arifin, and Kadi Sukarna. “Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal USM Law Review 3, no. 2 (2020): 259–74. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i2.2870.
Siswanto, Dadang. “Korupsi Sebagai Bentuk Kejahatan Transnasional Terorganisisr.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 42, no. 1 (2013): 124. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.42.1.2013.123-130.
Sompotan, Hendrik. “Pemberantasan Kejahatan Ekonomi Antar Negara Dengan Perjanjian Ekstradisi (Perspektif Indonesia).” LexEt Societatis 5, no. 8 (5 Desember 2017): 195. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v5i8.18991.
Sunarso, Siswanto. Ekstradisi Dan Bantuan Timbal Balik Dalam Masalah Pidana: Instrumen Penegakan Hukum Pidana Internasional. Vol. 1. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2009.
Wahid, A. (2023). Pemberlakuan Hukum Ekstradisi Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal USM Law Review, 6(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.5130
Widyawati, Anis. Hukum Pidana Internasional. Disunting oleh Tarmizi. Vol. 1. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Yasra, Setri. “Paulus Tannos Ditangkap: Kilas Balik Kasus Korupsi Pengadaan e-KTP.” Tempo, 1 Februari 2025. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/-paulus-tannos-ditangkap-kilas-balik-kasus-korupsi-pengadaan-e-ktp-1201328.
Yusuf, Hambali. "Policy And Criminal Law Enforcement Against The Perpetrators S Of Corruption:“Reorientation Objective Of Condemnation”." International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) 2.3 (2021): 194-202. https://doi.org/10.55357/ijrs.v2i3.191.
Zahra, Arsya Yustisia, et al. "Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Korupsi." Jurnal USM Law Review 6.3 (2023): 1250-1261. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.6758
Zulfikar, Pandri. “Perspektif Kewenangan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Kaitan Perjanjian Eksteradisi Indonesia dan Singapore.” Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum 9, no. 1 (30 Juni 2022): 83. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v9i1.6682.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.


Citedness in Scopus 

