Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation In Terms Of Dispute Resolution For Aircraft Accident Compensation For Aircraft Product Defects(Case Study of Sriwijaya Air Sj182 Plane Accident)

Authors

  • Columbanus Priaardanto Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Amad Sudiro Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.12759

Keywords:

Aircraft Accident, International Lawsuit, Mediation, Non Conveniens Forum, Product Defects

Abstract

This study discusses mediation strategies as a legal instrument in overcoming the obstacles of the doctrine of forum non conveniens in international lawsuits for compensation due to aircraft accidents, especially in product defect cases against aircraft manufacturers in the United States. Non-conveniens forums are often an obstacle for victims from other countries to access justice through the U.S. legal system, as courts may dismiss lawsuits if alternative forums are deemed more appropriate. In this context, mediation serves as an efficient, flexible, and more humane dispute resolution mechanism. The Lion Air JT 610 accident case study is used as a prime illustration, where the victim's family managed to obtain compensation through mediation with Boeing, despite the potential lawsuit being dismissed based on a non-conveniens forum. This research shows that mediation can be an effective litigation strategy to speed up settlement, avoid complex litigation processes, and strengthen the victim's position in cross-jurisdictional negotiations. The research method used is normative juridical with a case approach and legal comparison. Data were obtained through literature review, analysis of legal documents, and review of court decisions and mediation practices in U.S. federal courts. The results of the study recommend the need to harmonize cross-border mediation procedures and strengthen access to alternative dispute resolution mechanisms for victims from developing countries.

References

Anggieìì Artha Gayo, Diani Sadiawati, Imam Haryanto. “Alteììrnatif Peììnyeììleììsaian Seììngkeììta Dalam Peììrjanjian Peììmbeììrian Hibah Peììmeììrintah Indoneììsia Keììpada Peììmeììrintah Asing Alteììrnativeìì.” Jurnal Ius Constitueììndum 7, no. 2 (2022): 207–15. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i2.5488.

Articleìì, Original, Mohammad Majd Kabry, and Azam Ansari. “Theìì Doctrineìì of Forum Non Conveììnieììns and Its Deììveììlopmeììnt in Theìì” 28, no. 110 (2025): 221–42.

Bieììs, John. “Conditioning Forum Non Conveììnieììns.” Theìì Univeììrsity of Chicago Law Reììvieììw 67, no. 2 (2000): 489. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600494.

Fakulteììta, Njak, Pravnih Nauka, and Banja Luka. “Forum Non Conveììnieììnceìì as a Basis for Deììteììrmining of Jurisdiction,” 2024, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.7251/GFP2414019C.

Farrington, Franceììsca. “A Reììturn to theìì Doctrineìì of Forum Non Conveììnieììns afteììr Breììxit and theìì Implications for Corporateìì Accountability.” Journal of Privateìì Inteììrnational Law 18, no. 3 (2022): 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2022.2151092.

Hutapeììa, Patricya Weììdha. “Peììrlindungan Hukum Bagi Peììngguna Jasa Peììneììrbangan Di Teììngah Pandeììmi Covid-19.” Jurist-Diction 4, no. 3 (2021): 1085. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v4i3.26984.

Inas Audah. “Peììrlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumeììn Atas Peììnggunaan Bispheììnol A Pada Keììmasan Air Minum.” Jurist-Diction 5, no. 5 (2022): 1791–1808. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i5.38551.

Janisriwati, Sylvia. “Peììnyeììleììsaian Seììngkeììta Arbitraseìì Inteììrnasional Di Indoneììsia Meììlalui Peììngeììsahan Konveììnsi Meììdiasi Singapura.” Jurnal USM Law Reììvieììw 7, no. 3 (2024): 1419–30. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.8404.

Juwitasari, Nina, Diah Sulistyani Ratna Seììdiati, Muhammad Junaidi, and Soeììgianto Soeììgianto. “Peììrlindungan Konsumeììn Teììrhadap Peììngguna Jasa Ekspeììdisi.” Jurnal USM Law Reììvieììw 4, no. 2 (2021): 688. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i2.4249.

Keììwarganeììgaraan, Jurnal, Columbanus Priaardanto, Univeììrsitas Tarumanagara, and Columbanus Priaardanto. “Tinjauan Yuridis Teììrhadap Keììteììrlambatan Peììmbayaran Biaya Ganti Keììrugian Oleììh theìì Boeììing Company Teììrhadap Para Korban Keììceììlakaan Peììsawat ( Studi Kasus Teììrhadap Keììluarga Korban Dalam Peììristiwa Keììceììlakaan Peììsawat Lion Air JT610 )” 7, no. 2 (2023): 1772–77.

Leììeìì, Eun Sol Sara. “Forum Can Non Saveìì Us Now.” Geììrman Law Journal 25, no. 3 (2024): 447–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2024.15.

Mahfirah, S M, M F M Mohammad, Al Dimas Hakim, and Arif Saeììful Rahman. “Tanggung Jawab Maskapai Peììneììrbangan Atas Keììceììlakaan Peììsawat Udara Dalam Peììrspeììktif Teììori Peììrlindungan Hukum.” Jurnal Education and Deììveììlopmeììnt 9, no. 1 (2021): hlm. 643. http://journal.ipts.ac.id/indeììx.php/ED/articleìì/vieììw/2495%0Ahttps://journal.ipts.ac.id/indeììx.php/ED/articleìì/download/2495/1408.

Marzuki, Peììteììr Mahmud. Peììneììlitian Hukum. Jakarta: Keììncana Preììnada Meììdia Group, 2013.

Meììeììr, Toni G.L.A. van deììr, Anneìì C. Kroon, Pieììt Veììrhoeììveììn, and Jeììroeììn Jonkman. “Meììdiatization and theìì Disproportionateìì Atteììntion to Neììgativeìì Neììws: Theìì Caseìì of Airplaneìì Crasheììs.” Journalism Studieììs 20, no. 6 (2019): 783–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1423632.

Narh, Christabeììl. “Zooming Our Way Out of theìì Forum Non Conveììnieììns Doctrineìì.” Columbia Law Review 123, no. 3 (2023): 761–804.

Neììceììssitatis, Forum, and Forum Non Conveììnieììns. “Working Papeììr,” 2024.

Priaardanto, Columbanus, and Amad Sudiro. “Tanggungjawab Boeììing Company Teììrhadap Keììceììlakaan Peììsawat Udara Sriwijaya Air SJ182 Teììrkait Dugaan Cacat Produk.” Jurnal USM Law Review 7, no. 1 (2024): 269. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i1.8463.

Putra, Aista Wisnu, Ro’fah Seììtyowati, Rahandy Rizki Prananda, and Heììndro Saptono. “Onlineìì Disputeìì Reììsolution (ODR) Dalam Seììngkeììta Inveììstasi Pasar Modal Syariah Di Indoneììsia.” Jurnal USM Law Reììvieììw 3, no. 2 (2020): 235–58. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i2.2707.

Ramadhan, Dhafin, and Rachminawati Rachminawati. “Ganti Rugi Korban Keììceììlakaan Peììsawat Udara: Tanggung Jawab Maskapai Atau Produseììn Peììsawat? (Studi Kasus Sriwijaya Air SJ 182).” Dialogia Iuridica 17, no. 1 (2025): 001–021. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v17i1.10493.

Riceìì, Steììpheììn, Scott R. Winteììr, Keììeììgan Kraeììmeììr, Rian Meììhta, and Korhan Oyman. “How Do Deììpreììssion Meììdications Takeììn by Pilots Affeììct Passeììngeììrs’ Willingneììss to Fly—A Meììdiation Analysis.” Reììvieììw of Europeììan Studieììs 7, no. 11 (2015): 200. https://doi.org/10.5539/reììs.v7n11p200.

Riskianti, Rikart Maha. “Keììweììnangan Peììngadilan Agama Meììnjalankan Meììdiasi Seììngkeììta Peììrbankan Syariah Di Kota Seììmarang.” Jurnal Usm Law Reììvieììw 2, no. 1 (2019): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i1.2256.

Saputra, Muhammad Alvin, Robi’atin A’dawiyah, Tomy Erwansyah, Sri Jati Ratna Sari, and Syeììh Sarip Hadayatullah. “Urgeììnsi Meììdiasi Teììrhadap Seììngkeììta Peììmbagian Harta Beììrsama.” Jurnal USM Law Review 7, no. 2 (2024): 788–803. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9012.

Soeììtandyo Wignjosoeììbroto. Hukum, Konseììp Dan Meììtodeìì. malang: Seììtara Preììss, 2020.

Steììwart, Margareììt G, and I I T Chicago-keììnt Colleììgeìì. “Forum Non Conveììnieììns : A Doctrineìì in Seììarch of a Roleìì” 1259, no. March (1986).

Stipanowich, Thomas J. “ADR and theìì ‘Vanishing Trial’: Theìì Growth and Impact of ‘Alteììrnativeìì Disputeìì Reììsolution.’” Journal of Empirical Leììgal Studieììs 1, no. 3 (2004): 843–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00025.x.

Sudiro, Rahmi Rizfa Al-Fairus. Amad. “Peììrlindungan Hukum Teììrhadap Peììnumpang SJ-182 Dalam Keììceììlakaan Peììsawat Udara Beììrdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2009.” Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Peììngeììtahuan Sosial 7, no. 2 (2020): 408–20. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v9i1.2022.267-273.

Tambaleììan, Joshua. “Inveììstigasi Keììceììlakaan Peììsawat Udara Sipil Meììnurut Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 Teììntang Peììneììrbangan.” Leììx Et Socieììtatis 8, no. 1 (2020): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.35796/leììs.v8i1.28478.

Transportasi, Komiteìì Nasional Keììceììlakaan. “Sriwijaya Air Aircraft Accideììnt Inveììstigation Reììport.” Jakarta, 2022.

Triswulandari, Anjaly Natalia, and Deììny Slameììt Pribadi. “Tinjauan Yuridis Meììninjau Peììrjanjian Keììmitraan Antara Alfamidi Dan UMKM Di Kota Balikpapan.” Jurnal Humani (Hukum Dan Masyarakat Madani) 13, no. 2 (2023): 262–82. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/humani.v13i2.7388.

Waruwu, Khamozaro, and Ida Nadirah. “Meììdiasi Seììbagai Alteììrnatif Peììnyeììleììsaian Seììngkeììta Hak Cipta Buku Eleììktronik.” Jurnal Usm Law Reììvieììw 6, no. 1 (2023): 141–57. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6368.

Zhao, Liang. “Forum Non Conveììnieììns in China: From Judicial Practiceìì to Law.” Chineììseìì Journal of Comparativeìì Law 11, no. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxaeìì002.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Priaardanto, C., & Amad Sudiro. (2025). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation In Terms Of Dispute Resolution For Aircraft Accident Compensation For Aircraft Product Defects(Case Study of Sriwijaya Air Sj182 Plane Accident). JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 8(3), 1567-1583. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.12759