Analysis of Default in Cooperation Agreements: A Perspective on Rights and Obligations of The Parties In Dispute Resolution

Rayhan Fahriza Yose; Gunawan Djajaputra

doi:10.26623/julr.v8i2.12071

Authors

Rayhan Fahriza Yose Tarumanagara University
Gunawan Djajaputra Tarumanagara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.12071

Keywords:

Cooperation Agreement, Default, Dispute Resolution, Rights and Obligations

Abstract

This study aims to analyze defaults in cooperation agreements and examine the rights and obligations of the parties in dispute resolution. The urgency of this research arises from the increasing occurrence of defaults in cooperation agreements, which have significant legal and economic consequences for business relationships and economic stability. Using a normative juridical approach, the research examines provisions of the Indonesian Civil Code and relevant legal doctrines, focusing on dispute resolution mechanisms through litigation and alternative methods. Primary legal sources include the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), Law No. 30/1999 on Arbitration, and Supreme Court regulations, while secondary sources comprise legal journals and court decisions. The findings show that default in cooperation agreements results in legal consequences such as compensation, agreement termination, and performance enforcement. Several procedural conditions must be met, including the seriousness of the breach and timely legal action. The study provides a novel contribution by combining normative legal analysis with practical considerations in resolving contractual disputes within the Indonesian legal framework. It concludes that cooperation agreements must clearly define mutual obligations and dispute resolution procedures to ensure legal certainty and fairness. The research recommends that parties include specific clauses addressing default and adopt alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to reduce litigation and maintain business relationships.

References

Alwi, L., M. Tjoanda, and P. Radjawane. “Ganti Kerugian Akibat Wanprestasi Perjanjian Kerjasama (Bagi Hasil) Kajian KUHPerdata.” KANJOLI Business Law Review 1, no. 2 (2023): 105–12.

Arifin, Miftah, Zaenal Arifin, and Mac Thi Hoai Thuong. “The Principle of Proportionality on Digital Business Agreements: Between Mitigation and Orientation.” Indonesia Private Law Review 4, no. 1 (2023): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2954.

Arifin, Zaenal, Diah Sulistyani, Reiska Hendristianto, and Miftah Arifin. “Keabsahan Dan Perlindungan Hukum Perjanjian Kemitraan Jasa Konstruksi.” Jurnal USM Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 65–78. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6095.

Atmoko, D. Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Malang: PT. Literasi Nusantara Abadi Group, 2023.

Badri, Syaiful, Pristika Handayani, and Tri Anugrah Rizki. “Ganti Rugi Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dan Wanprestasi Dalam Sistem Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 7, no. 2 (2024): 974. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9440.

Bianti, G. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Yang Berpotensi Menghambat Kegiatan Investasi Asing Di Indonesia.” CREPIDO 5, no. 1 (2023): 64–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.5.1.64-78.

Chumbhadrika, C. “Penerapan Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Melalui Gugatan Sederhana (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 8/PDT.G.S/2020/PN.Yyk.).” IBLAM Law Review 1, no. 2 (2021): 169–82.

Damayanti, Ratna, Cicilia Julyani Tondy, and Yuliana Setiadi. “Perlindungan Hukum Akibat Wanprestasi Perjanjian Perseroan Komanditer Dengan Pihak Ketiga.” Case Law : Journal of Law 6, no. 1 (February 2025): 87–99. https://doi.org/10.25157/caselaw.v6i1.4772.

Imron, Ali. “Stolen Asset Recovery Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Pendekatan Sistem Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Terhadap Aset Hasil Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Korupsi): Recovery Of Assets Stolen By Criminal Acts Of Corruption.” Res Nullius Law Journal 6, no. 2 SE-Articles (July 2024): 111–26. https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v6i2.13013.

Indonesia, Pemerintah Pusat. “Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa,” 1999.

Kamsidah. “Mau Bikin Perjanjian, Yuk Simak Hal-Hal Apa Saja Yang Harus Dipenuhi!” Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara, 2023.

Long, Jie, and Chuying Huang. “Obligations and Liabilities Concerning the Active Removal of Foreign Space Debris: A Global Governance Perspective.” Acta Astronautica 222 (2024): 422–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.06.036.

Lubis T.H. “Hukum Perjanjian Di Indonesia .” Jurnal Sosek 2, no. 3 (2022): 177–90.

Mendrofa, K N, B K Telaumbanua, and S Zulkifli. “Tinjauan Yuridis Gugatan Wanprestasi Yang Tidak Dapat Diterima Oleh Pengadilan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 9/PDT. G/2018/PN. GST).” Jurnal Hukum Al-Hikmah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat 2, no. 2 (2021): 248–57.

Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. “What Is an Appropriate Measure of Litigation? Quantification, Qualification and Differentiation of Dispute Resolution.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 11, no. 2 (20211): 2020–54. https://doi.org/https://ssrn.com/abstract=3663304.

Mulyadi. Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Perspektif Praktis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2020.

Nisa, Madha Ratu, and Abdul Muiz Nuroni. “Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (Online) 3, no. 2 (December 2023): 2121–33.

Novi, Merry Marcella, Rachmadi Usman, and Nurunnisa. “Legal Position on The Concept of Civil Relations with Respect to Out of Wedding Children.” JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review 5, no. 2 SE-Articles (February 2024): 275–98. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v5i2.221.

“Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.” Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2016.

Putra, I Wayan Yudi Antara, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, and Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti. “Perjanjian Kerja Sama Program Gerakan Sekolah Menulis Buku Nasional.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 4, no. 2 (2022): 209–2014.

Quintarti, Maria Alberta Liza. “Konsekuensi Hukum Terhadap Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Bisnis.” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 7, no. 8 (2024): 3176–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i8.5997.

Rosidi, A. “Metode Dalam Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Sosiologis (Field Research).” Journal Law and Government 2, no. 1 (2024): 46–58.

Sinaga, N. A., and N. Darwis. “Wanprestasi Dan Akibatnya Dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian.” Jurnal Mitra Manajemen 7, no. 2 (2015): 42–57.

Sinaulan, Chandra Israel Palar, Hendrik Pondaag, and Deasy Soeikromo. “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Yang Tidak Melakukan Transaksi Sesuai Prosedur Cash On Delivery (COD) Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata.” Lex Privatum 11, no. 5 (2023): 1–11. https://doi.org/https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/48582.

Susanto, M .D. Dinantara, M. Sutoro, and M. Iqbal. Pengantar Hukum Bisnis . Banten: Unpam Press , 2019.

Usman, I., T. M. Ahmed, and S. O. Odobo. “Achieving Effective Conflict Resolution through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Mechanisms in Nigeria.” Journal of Guidance and Counselling Studies 9, no. 1 (2025): 1–15.

Wala, G., and H. Firmansyah. “Konsep Restorative Justice Untuk Mengurangi Over Capacity Pada Perkara Pidana.” Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 12, no. 2 (2024): 247–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2024.v12.i02.p19.

Wibowo, Agus. “Hukum Di Era Globalisasi Digital.” Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik 9, no. 1 SE-Judul Buku (2023): 1–185.

Widya Yuniati Siregar, and Debora Debora. “Peran Kekuatan Merek Bagi UMKM MoriGe : Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Dan Mendukung Keberlanjutan Bisnis.” Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora 4, no. 2 (May 2025): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i2.4328.

Wijaya, Hanna, Yohanes Firmansyah, Yana Sylvana, and Michelle Angelika S. “History of Burgerlijk Wetboek in Indonesia.” Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains 2, no. 4 (2021): 535–41. https://doi.org/10.36418/jiss.v2i4.252.