Legal Study of Unlawful Acts by The Opponents In Land Dispute Decision Number 6/Pdt.Bth/2024/Pn Bpp

Aldo Yanuarto; Aris Sunandar; Abdul Khair

doi:10.26623/julr.v8i2.11971

Authors

Aldo Yanuarto Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
Aris Sunandar Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
Abdul Khair Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.11971

Keywords:

Good Faith, Land Dispute, Unlawful Act

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a juridical analysis of the elements and legal reasoning used by the panel of judges in establishing the existence of an unlawful act (onrechtmatige daad) committed by the Defendants in a land dispute case, as stipulated in the Decision of the Balikpapan District Court Number 6/PDT.BTH/2024/PN BPP. Employing normative legal research with a conceptual and case approach, this study focuses on the interpretation of Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata) and the judicial construction applied by the court in assessing the Defendants’ actions. The urgency of this study lies in the increasing complexity of land disputes in Indonesia, which demand clearer doctrinal and judicial guidance in determining the threshold of unlawful acts in civil litigation. The novelty of this research is its integrative use of abuse of rights theory and good faith principles as analytical tools to assess the boundaries of civil liability, which have not been thoroughly explored in previous studies. The findings reveal that the Defendants' act of filing for execution over a parcel of land that had been lawfully transferred to the Plaintiff, without a legitimate legal basis, constitutes a clear instance of an unlawful act. Such conduct satisfies the juridical elements of tort as outlined in both doctrine and jurisprudence: the existence of an act, its unlawfulness, fault, actual damages, and a causal relationship between the act and the harm incurred. The court’s decision reflects a balanced consideration of good faith principles, legal protection doctrines, and the abuse of right theory in determining the Defendants’ civil liability. This study recommends a more consistent application of these doctrines to ensure legal certainty and justice in future land dispute adjudications.

References

Akbar, Reynaldi Febrian. “Pertanggungjawaban Perusahaan Terhadap Pekerja / Buruh Yang Melakukan Kelalaian Kerja.” Lex Positivis 2(8): 2, no. 8 (2024): 1001–14.

Anggraeni, Iftita Zahra, and Harjono Harjono. “Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Facebook.” Verstek 11, no. 3 (2023): 498. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i3.73336.

Ardiansyah, Romi, Imam Asmarudin, and Tiyas Vika Widyastuti. “Tinjauan Yuridis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Perkara Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dengan Sertipikat Hak Milik.” Pancasakti Law Journal …, 2023, 267–78.

Ariadin. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Hukum Kontrak Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pelita Nusantara 1, no. 3 (2023): 449–56. https://doi.org/10.59996/jurnalpelitanusantara.v1i3.505.

Chairunissa, Siti, Sulkiah Hendrawati, and Faturohman. “Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Sanksi Pidana Penjara Terhadap Pelaku Penyalahgunaan Narkotika.” Jurnal Hukum Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2022): 19–29.

Clarins, Sharon. “Penerapan Doktrin Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Indonesia.” “Dharmasisya” 1, no. 4 (2021): 2143–58.

Dwilianto, Rafli, Alya Arrahmah, Intan Yulia Putri, and Alwi Usman Matondang. “Penegakan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan.” Garuda: Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Dan Filsafat 2, no. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59581/garuda.v2i3.3761.

Endang, S, and Rizka Dewi Aprillia Ramadan, Suta Ramadan. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Penerbitan Sertifikat Hak Milik ( SHM ) Atas Bidang Tanah Sebagai Objek Sengketa Yang Tidak Memiliki Kekuatan Hukum Mengikat Secara Sepihak (Studi Putusan Nomor 6/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Kla) S.” Journal Presumption Of Law 6, no. 2 (2024): 203–21. https://doi.org/https://ejournal.unma.ac.id/index.php/jpl.

Ferdi Irawan, Erlina B, Melisa Safitri. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Perkara PMH Oleh Prumnas Way Halim Akibat Kelalaian Pembuatan Sertifikat Tanah.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 2 (2022): 4099–4108.

Habibi, Mustafha, Abdul Khair, and Reza Noor Ihsan. “Upaya Pengembangan Home Industry Oleh Pemerintah Daerah Kota Palangka Raya.” Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum (JISYAKU) 3, no. 1 (2024): 18–30. https://doi.org/10.23971/jisyaku.v3i1.7595.

Halipah, Gisni, Dani Fajar Purnama, Bintang Timur Pratama, Budi Suryadi, and Fauzi Hidayat. “Tinjauan Yuridis Konsep Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Konteks Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum 16, no. 01 (2023): 138–43. https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v16i01.923.

Hayati, Mulida, and Elin Sudiarti. “Ajaran Misbruik Van Omstandigheden Sebagai Alasan Hakim Dalam Memperbaiki Suatu Perjanjian ( Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Palangka Raya Nomor 160 / Pdt . G / 2016 / PN Plk ).” Unes Law Review 6, no. 3 (2024): 8503–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.

Indah Sari. “Hak-Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Sistem Hukum Pertanahan Di Indonesia Menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA).” Jurnal Mitra Manajemen 9, no. 1 (2017): 15–33.

Isma, Anggun. “Dasar Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Diluar Dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Journal of Legal Studies 1, no. 3 (2023): 190–213.

Ismail, Mahsun. “Telaah Terhadap Konstruksi Proses Hukum Yang Adil Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 1, no. 1 (2018): 99. https://doi.org/10.30595/jhes.v1i1.3714.

Kamal, Ubaidillah. “Kausalitas Dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pada Perjanjian Kredit Yang Telah Diasuransikan,” 2025, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i01.p03.

Khoiruddin, Muhammad, and Kuswardani. “Parameter Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Peralihan Hak Ganti Rugi Tanah Dalam Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Putusan Tingkat Pertama 18/Pdt. G/2016/PN.Rgt Sampai Peninjauan Kembali 681 K/Pdt/2018).” UNES Law Review 5, no. 3 (2023): 1256–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.

Latif, Abdul. “Jaminan UUD 1945 Dalam Proses Hukum Yang Adil.” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 1 (2016): 049. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk714.

Levmore, Saul. “Richard Posner, the Decline of the Common Law, and the Negligence Principle.” The University of Chicago Law Review, n.d.

Malau, Masnida, Yuniar Rahmatiar, and Muhamad Abas. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Atas Penyerobotan Tanah Milik Orang Lain Dihubungkan Dengan Pasal 1365 KUH Perdata.” Binamulia Hukum 12, no. 2 (2023): 299–307. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i2.427.

Manery, Barnabas Dumas. “Makna Dan Fungsi Itikad Baik Dalam Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi.” Sasi 23, no. 2 (2018): 136. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v23i2.101.

Mantili Rai. “Ganti Kerugian Immateriil Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Praktik: Perbandingan Indonesia Dan Belanda.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure 4, no. 2 (2019): 298–321. https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/jurnalilmiahhukumdejure/article/download/6460/3229/17049.

Manurung, Yulianto. “Tinjauan Yuridis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Terhadap Cacat Badan Di Indonesia.” Dharmasisya 1, no. November (2021): 1631–54.

Maria Avelina Abon, Komang Febrinayanti Dantes, and Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani. “Akibat Hukum Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Waris Berdasarkan Pasal 20 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia 5, no. 3 (2022): 64–80. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v5i3.51871.

Maulidi, Mohammad Agus. “Problematika Hukum Implementasi Putusan Final Dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi Perspektif Negara Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 24, no. 4 (2017): 535–57. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art2.

Mendy Cevitra dan Gunawan Djajaputra. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatige Daad) Menurut Pasal 1365 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Dan Perkembangannya.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 5 (2023): 57–65.

Sari, Indah. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Pmh) Dalam Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 11, no. 1 (2020): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v11i1.651.

Suradilaga, Aris Sunandar. “Politik Hukum Keperdataan Islam Di Masa Kolonial Belanda.” Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum (JISYAKU) 1, no. 2 (2022): 161–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/35.4.781.

Taolin, Fitriana Trinengsi, Dian Aries Mujiburohman, and Koes Widarbo. “Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Dalam Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah.” Tunas Agraria 7, no. 1 (2024): 68–85. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v7i1.277.

Toga Rizky Anugrah. “Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Unsur Melawan Hukum Dalam Perkara Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Marissa Nomor : PDS-02/MRS/06/2009).” Malang, 2016.

Wardhani, Wiene. “Unsur Kesalahan Dalam Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechmatige Daad) Pada Sengekta Lingkungan Hidup (Putusan Nomor 118/Pdt.G/Lh/2016/Pn.Plk).” Jurnal Verstek 8, no. 3 (2020): 460–69. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jv.v8i3.47068.

Wijaya, Brian Khukuh, Nur Rochaeti, and Ani Purwanti. “Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Kasus Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor. 14/PID.SUS.ANAK/2015/PN SMG).” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 4 (2016): 1–12.

Yasid, Yensa Margareth Tarigan Ayu Lestari Malau Muhammad, Lestari Victoria Sinaga, and Universitas Darma Agung. “Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Perceraian Perkawinan Katolik (Kajian Normatif Terhadap Putusan No. 686/Pdt.G/2017/Pn Bks. Dan No. 478/Pdt/2018/Pt.Bdg Serta Hukum Kanonik).” Journal Diktum 3, no. 686 (2024): 126–34.

Yusriyyah, Ririh Titis, and Zakki Adlhiyati. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Terhadap Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Adat,” no. 31 (n.d.): 12–21. https://doi.org/10.20961/jolsic.v12i1.836.