Creditor's Responsibility for Forced Withdrawal of Fiduciary Objects After Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019

Nabil Luthfi Abyan, Wardani Rizkianti

Abstract


This research aims to examine the changing dynamics of fiduciary security execution after Indonesian Constitutional Court Decisions No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. The focus of this research lies on the creditor's responsibility in the context of forced withdrawal of the fiduciary object after the debtor's failure. This research uses a normative juridical research method with a legal source approach and case analysis. Through in-depth analysis of legal sources such as the constitution, laws, and relevant court decisions, this research identifies significant changes in the practice of fiduciary security execution. The case approach is used to understand the implementation of legal decisions in concrete situations. The results show that, in the case of a default agreement, parate execution can be an acceptable alternative, providing flexibility in settlement. However, when there is no agreement, court intervention is required to ensure fairness. This research provides a deeper understanding of the changes in the practice of fiduciary security execution, as well as a new outlook on creditor responsibilities and the need for adjustments in legal practice. Therefore, the novelty of this research lies in the in-depth understanding of creditor responsibilities in situations of forced withdrawal of fiduciary objects, especially after recent legal changes.

 


Keywords


Creditor’s Responsibility; Fiduciary Object; Forced Pulsing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alizon, Joni. “Rekonstruksi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019.” Eksekusi 2, no. 1 (June 1, 2020): 58. https://doi.org/10.24014/je.v2i1.9741.

Angelica Janwarin, Katarina Zein, Etty Mulyati, and Aam Suryamah. “Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Melalui Putusan Pengadilan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/Puu-Xix/2021.” Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 8, no. 2 (February 23, 2023): 1002–15. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i2.11379.

Bouzen, Robert, and Ashibly Ashibly. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Debitur Yang Wanprestasi Setelah Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019.” Jurnal Gagasan Hukum 3, no. 02 (December 29, 2021): 137–48. https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v3i02.8907.

Candera, Ardianto, Dewi Astutty Mochtar, Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti, and Mohammad Ghufron Az. “Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Kreditur (Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia).” Bhirawa Law Journal 2, no. 2 (November 29, 2021): 111–21. https://doi.org/10.26905/blj.v2i2.6829.

Dewa Bagus Komang Mahendra Krisna Putra, Anak Agung Istri Agung, and I Made Minggu Widyantara. “Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Kreditur Tanpa Adanya Sertifikat Jaminan.” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 3, no. 2 (March 29, 2022): 390–94. https://doi.org/10.55637/jkh.3.2.4842.390-394.

Efferin, James Ridwan. “Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019.” Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 12, no. 1 (April 2, 2020): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v12i1.789.

Febriyanti, Wiwin Dwi Ratna. “Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019.” ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 6, no. 2 (March 8, 2021): 39. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.128.

Firmansyah. “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu Xvii/ 2019 Tentang Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Ditinjau Dari Siyasah Dusturiyah.” Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu, 2022.

Hasrul, Fajri, Busyra azheri, and Muhammad Hasbi. “Perlindungan Hukum bagi Kreditur dalam Penarikan Paksa Objek Jaminan Fidusia di PT. Astra Credit Companies Kota Padang.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (September 15, 2023). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.934.

Hermanto, Edy, and Sigit Irianto. “Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen Dengan Jaminan Fidusia Pada Perusahaan Multifinance.” Notary Law Research 1, no. 1 (December 29, 2020): 21. https://doi.org/10.56444/nlr.v1i1.1383.

Hidayat, Nur. “Penarikan Paksa Kendaraan Bermotor Dalam Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019.” Jurnal Yustitia 22, no. 2 (December 23, 2021). https://doi.org/10.53712/yustitia.v22i2.1337.

Hidayat, Rahmat, and Soegianto Soegianto. “Penyelesaian Debitur Wan Prestasi Atas Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Telah Didaftarkan.” Jurnal USM Law Review 2, no. 2 (November 20, 2019): 288. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i2.2275.

Jadidah, Fikrotul. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 18/Puu-Xvii/2019).” Iblam Law Review 2, no. 2 (May 30, 2022): 17–37. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v2i2.69.

Junaedi, Budi, Merry Tjoanda, and Teng Berlianty. “Perlindungan Hukum Pada Debitur Atas Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Melalui Parate Eksekusi.” Pattimura Legal Journal 1, no. 2 (August 18, 2022): 124–32. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i2.6433.

Kosasih, Johannes Ibrahim, Anak Agung Istri Agung, and Anak Agung Sagung Laksmani Dewi. “Parate Eksekusi Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Kostitusi (MK) NO. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Dan No: 02/PUU-XIX/2021 Terhadap Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Atas Lembaga Pembiayaan Leasin.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 10, no. 1 (April 24, 2022): 114–35. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i1.971.

Law No. 42/1999 on Fiduciary Guarantee, 1999.

Manurung, Saut Parulian, and Kevin Chrismanto Nugroho Wilopo. “Mereduksi Praktik Eigenrichting Dan Menyeimbangkan Kedudukan Hukum Para Pihak Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 6, no. 2 (October 15, 2021): 284. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v6i2.3197.

Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. NTB-Mataram University Press, 2020.

Pasaribu, Enni Martalena, Darwinsyah Minin, Marlina Marlina, and M. Citra Ramadhan. “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Benda Jaminan Fidusia Yang Digadaikan Oleh Debitur Kepada Pihak Lain.” Arbiter: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum 1, no. 1 (May 2, 2019): 53–65. https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v1i1.105.

Purwati, Ani. Metode Penelitian Hukum Teori & Praktek. Jakad Media Publishing, 2020.

R. Suharto, Siti M. Badriyah, and Agnia Zahradinda. “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Atas Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Dialihkan Kepihak Ketiga (Studi Kasus Di Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Artomoro Sejahtera Semarang).” Diponegoro Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2019): 22–35. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2019.25326.

Rae, Deystia Ayesha. “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Terhadap Hak Melakukan Parate Eksekusi Oleh Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 5, no. 2 (March 1, 2021). https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v5i2.1808.

Ramdhani, Fahmi Ali. “Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Terhadap Penarikan Dan Penyitaan Objek Jaminan Fiducia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Kreditur.” Adliya: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan 15, no. 1 (March 31, 2021): 51–66. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v15i1.9939.

Riskawati, Shanti. “Rasio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019 Dan Perubahan Konstruksi Norma Eksekusi Dan Wanprestasi Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia” 5, no. 1 (2021): 33–48. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i1.613.

Rizkia, Nanda Dwi, and Hardi Fardiansyah. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif Dan Empiris). Widina Media Utama, 2023.

Rufaida, Khifni Kafa. “Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Titel Eksekutorial Yang Sah.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (October 31, 2019): 21–40. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1.p21-40.

Sherly Mayasari, Imaculata, and Nynda Fatmawati Octarina. “Kedudukan Hukum Pidana Atas Pengambilan Kendaraan Paksa Debitur Oleh Debt Collector Lembaga Pembiayaan.” Jurnal Rechtens 9, no. 2 (December 30, 2020): 141–52. https://doi.org/10.36835/rechtens.v9i2.788.

Siombo, Marhaeni Ria. “Implementasi Mekanisme Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor : 18/PUU- XVII/2019” 32, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.32.1.88-111.

Sipahutar, Apul Oloan, Zaenal Arifin, Kukuh Sudarmanto, and Diah Sulistyani Ratna Sediati. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Praktik Pada Debitur Yang Wanprestasi.” Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 1 (April 23, 2022): 144. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4254.

Soegianto, Dr., Diah Sulistiyani R S, and Muhammad Junaidi. “Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kajian Undang- Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 4, no. 2 (September 15, 2019): 191. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1658.

Solikin, Nur. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Penerbit Qiara Media, 2021.

Syafrida, Syafrida, and Ralang Hartati. “Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu/Xvii/2019).” Adil: Jurnal Hukum 11, no. 1 (August 24, 2020). https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v11i1.1447.

Syam, Misnar. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Vii/2019 Pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Di Kota Padang.” UNES Journal of Swara Justisia 7, no. 2 (July 1, 2023): 335. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.349.

Wahyuni, Yeyen. “Parate Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.” Interdisciplinary Journal On Law, Social Sciences And Humanities 2, no. 1 (May 31, 2021): 47. https://doi.org/10.19184/ijl.v2i1.22760.

Welfiandi, Fitrian. “Eksekusi Terhadap Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019 Dan Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 6, no. 1 (January 4, 2022). https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v6i1.2742.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v9i1.8316

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Ius Constituendum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Jurnal Ius Constituendum :  Journal Law by Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.