Ius Constituendum Diversi Terhadap Pengulangan Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak

Rendy Airlangga, Kyagus Ramadhani, Yuvina Ariestanti, Adam Ardiansyah Ramadhan

Abstract


This research aims to know the diversion concept related to recidivism system for a criminal that committed by underage person. This thing has been happened because there is differential meaning between recidivism concept in Juvenile Criminal Justice System and Criminal Law Code. Criminal Law Code interpreted recidivism as the crime that re-committed by person and that crime is legally binding. Whereas Juvenile Criminal Justice System  interpreted prohibition  of the application of diversion for a crime that has been committed by underage person. The urgent things about this research focused on the problem where a crime has been already committed by underage person and that crime has been finished by diversion system, does this can be categorized that it can not get diversion process again. This research is using juridical normative method which is studied prescriptively with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Criminalization of children as recidivist in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System currently has no provisions governing criminal sanctions against children who commit repeated crimes (recidivism), both contained in the Criminal Code and in the Law of The Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Diversion which is mandated by Law No. 11 of 2012 is implemented based on the foundation of restorative justice which is very concerned about children’s rights. Lastly this research expected can be considered in trying to determine recidivism concept in integrated criminal system.

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui konsep diversi berkaitan dengan sistem residivisme pada anak yang menjadi pelaku tindak pidana di Indonesia. Hal ini dikarenakan konsep residivisme di UU SPPA dan KUHP memiliki perbedaan makna. Di KUHP menafsirkan residivisme sebagai sebuah perbuatan tindak pidana yang dilakukan kembali oleh seseorang yang telah dijatuhi hukuman pidana dengan memiliki kekuatan hukum tetap (Inchracht). Sedangkan dalam UU SPPA mengenal konsep pelarangan penerapan diversi terhadap anak yang telah melakukan tindak pidana. Urgensi permasalahan ini dititikberatkan pada permasalahan dimana anak yang telah melakukan tindak pidana kemudian diselesaikan secara diversi apakah kemudian dikategorikan tidak dapat menerima proses diversi lagi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yang dikaji secara preskriptif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Pemidanaan terhadap anak sebagai residivis dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak saat ini masih belum terdapat pengaturan yang mengatur tentang sanksi pidana terhadap anak yang melakukan pengulangan tindak pidana (recidive), baik yang terkandung di dalam KUHP maupun di dalam Undang Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Diversi yang diamanatkan oleh Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 diimplementasikan berdasarkan landasan restorative justice yang sangat memperhatikan hak-hak anak. Sehingga pada akhirnya penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi pertimbangan dalam menentukan konsep residivis di dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang terpadu.


Keywords


Child Crime; Diversion; Recidivism; Diversi; Residivisme; Tindak Pidana Anak

Full Text:

PDF

References


A., Farid Z. Hukum Pidana I. Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Afandi, Fachrizal. “Penelitian Hukum Interdisipliner Reza Banakar: Urgensi Dan Desain Penelitian Sosio-Legal.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 5, No. 1 (2022): 231–55. Https://Doi.Org/10.22437/Ujh.5.1.231-255.

Akbar, Muhammad Fatahillah. “Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 51, No. 2 (2022): 199–208. Https://Doi.Org/10.14710/Mmh.51.2.2022.199-208.

Barton-Crosby, Jennifer. “The Nature And Role Of Morality In Situational Action Theory.” European Journal Of Criminology 19, No. 6 (November 11, 2022): 1421–37. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1477370820977099.

Braithwaite, John Bradford. “Restorative Justice And Responsive Regulation: The Question Of Evidence.” Ssrn Electronic Journal, 2014. Https://Doi.Org/10.2139/Ssrn.2514127.

Fazel, Seena, And Achim Wolf. “A Systematic Review Of Criminal Recidivism Rates Worldwide: Current Difficulties And Recommendations For Best Practice.” Edited By Alejandro Raul Hernandez Montoya. Plos One 10, No. 6 (June 18, 2015): E0130390. Https://Doi.Org/10.1371/Journal.Pone.0130390.

Goldi, Vasile. “Analysis Of The Connections Between Law And Morals, Between Customs And Contemporaneity” 25, No. 39 (2020): 57–68. Https://Doi.Org/10.2478/Jles-2020-0004.

Hairi, Prianter Jaya. “Konsep Dan Pembaruan Residivisme Dalam Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia (Concept And Reform Of Recidivism In Criminal Law In Indonesia).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 9, No. 2 (January 2, 2019): 199–216. Https://Doi.Org/10.22212/Jnh.V9i2.1048.

“Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.” Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Kbbi), N.D. Https://Kbbi.Web.Id/Residivisme.

Komariah, Siti, And Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba. “Penerapan Konsep Diversi Bagi Anak Penyandang Disabilitas Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 4, No. 2 (November 6, 2021): 586. Https://Doi.Org/10.26623/Julr.V4i2.4058.

Leider, Robert. “Journal Of Criminal Law And Criminology: Foreword.” Journal Of Criminal Law And Criminology 97, No. 2 (2021): 377–78.

Leonard, Liam J. “Can Restorative Justice Provide A Better Outcome For Participants And Society Than The Courts?” Laws 11, No. 1 (February 14, 2022): 14. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Laws11010014.

Lubis, Muhammad Ridwan, And Panca Sarjana Putra. “Pemidanaan Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 4, No. 1 (June 18, 2021): 226. Https://Doi.Org/10.26623/Julr.V4i1.3354.

Marpi, Yapiter, Erlangga, Bakti Toni Endaryono, And Krismayu Noviani. “Legal Effective Of Putting ‘Business As Usual’ Clause In Agreements.” International Journal Of Criminology And Sociology 10 (2021): 58–70. Https://Doi.Org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.09.

Muladi. “Implementasi Pendekatan ‘Restorative Justice’ Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana 2, No. 2 (2019): 58–85. Https://Ejournal.Undip.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Phpidana/Article/View/25036.

Nasution, Nurul Isnina Syawalia Arifah. “Politik Hukum Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Dalam Rkuhp.” Khazanah Multidisiplin 2, No. 1 (February 12, 2021): 45–56. Https://Doi.Org/10.15575/Km.V2i1.11636.

Nyinaq, Desideria, And Harkirtan Kaur. “Assessing The View Of Criminology Science In Seniority Violence Cases.” International Journal Of Social, Policy And Law (Ijospl) 2, No. 3 (2021): 28–47. Http://Www.Ijospl.Org.

Paramitha, Ni Made Wahyuni, I Ketut Sukadana, And Ni Made Sukaryati Karma. “Pemberatan Hukuman Terhadap Residivis (Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor 50/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Tab).” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 3, No. 1 (March 16, 2021): 84–89. Https://Doi.Org/10.22225/Ah.3.1.2021.84-89.

Pengadilan Negeri Palopo. “Sekilas Tentang Konsep Peradilan Pidana Anak,” 2022. Https://Www.Pn-Palopo.Go.Id/Index.Php/Berita/Artikel/363-Sekilas-Tentang-Konsep-Peradilan-Pidana-Anak.

Sakidjo, Aruan & Poernomo, Bambang. Hukum Pidana Dasar Aturan Umum Pidana Kodifikasi. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1990.

Simanjutak, Komis, Suriani Suriani, Dany Try Hutama Hutabarat, And Rinda Alpadira. “Peran Jaksa Dalam Pelaksanaan Diversi Terhadap Pidana Anak.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 7, No. 2 (November 12, 2022): 351. Https://Doi.Org/10.26623/Jic.V7i2.5677.

Sutanti, Rahmi Dwi. “Kebijakan Aplikatif Pemberatan Pidana Bagi Pelaku Pengulangan Tindak Pidana.” Ijcls (Indonesian Journal Of Criminal Law Studies) 2, No. 1 (August 19, 2017): 40–53. Https://Doi.Org/10.15294/Ijcls.V2i1.10814.

Triwati, Ani, And Doddy Kridasaksana. “Pijakan Perlunya Diversi Bagi Anak Dalam Pengulangan Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 4, No. 2 (2021): 828. Https://Doi.Org/10.26623/Julr.V4i2.3787.

“Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak.” Jdih Bpk Ri, 2012. Https://Peraturan.Bpk.Go.Id/Home/Details/39061/Uu-No-11-Tahun-2012.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i2.7055

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Ius Constituendum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Jurnal Ius Constituendum :  Journal Law by Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.