TORT VICTIM S ABILITY TO PROFIT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF INSOLVENT TORTFEASOR S LIABILITY INSURANCE

Yasser Mandela, I Ketut Dharma Putra Yoga

Abstract


This article describes and examines whether the tort victim can profit from the proceeds of the tortfeasor s liability insurance. This article aims to reflect on which approach, either in common or civil law, provides more access for the tort victim to profits from the proceeds of insolvent tortfeasor s liability insurance policy. The method used in this research is comparative research. The result of this research showed that the status of insurance proceeds becomes debatable because the tort victim (as the claimant) will have no better rights than any other unsecured creditors during insolvency proceedings. This is regardless of the fact that the tortfeasor already got a fund, albeit indirectly through the insurer, to compensate the tort victim s losses. In relation to this issue, the United Kingdom has adopted the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 which gives right for tort victim to directly claim for compensation against tortfeasor s liability insurer in the event of tortfeasor s insolvency. Meanwhile, the Indonesian legal system provides no clear legal protection to the tort victim. Thus, in the event of insolvency, the tort victim cannot obtain compensation from the insurer, but only from tortfeasor s bankruptcy estate as part of creditors debts. Furthermore, as an unsecured creditor, the tort victim will obtain the debtor s bankruptcy estate after all secured creditors have received their payment.


Keywords


Tort Victim; Insolvency; Liability Insurance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Book

Ebert, Ina. (2012). Tort Law and Insurance. In Mauro Bussani and Anthony J. Sebok (eds), Comparative Tort Law Global Perspective, (Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 144-150).

Clarke, Malcom. (2012). An introduction to insurance contract law. In Julian Burling and Kevin Lazarus (Ed.). Research Handbook on International Insurance Law and Regulations, (Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 3-18).

McKendrick, Ewan. (2012). Contract Law Text, Cases and Materials. England: Oxford University Press.

Nugroho, Susanti Adi. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia: Dalam Teori dan Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Padfield, Alison. (2016). Insurance Claim. England: Bloomsbury.

Pramono, Nindyo and Sularto. (2017). Hukum Kepailitan dan Keadilan Pancasila. ANDI: Yogyakarta.

Shubhan, M. Hadi. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. (2016). Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Wood, Phillip R. (1995). Principle of International Insolvency (Part I), London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Regulation

Germany Insurance Contract Act 2008 (Versicherungsvertragsgesetz)

Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debts (Bankruptcy Law).

Law No. 40 of 2014 on Insurance (Insurance Law).

Supreme Court of Indonesia Decision No. 635 K/Sip/1973 dated 4 July 1974.

UK Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930.

UK Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010.

Journal/Article

Butarbutar, Elisabeth Nurhaini. (2019). Pembuktian Terhadap Perbuatan Debitur yang Merugikan Kreditur Dalam Tuntutan Actio Pauliana. Jakarta: Jurnal Yudisial, Komisi Yudisial, 12(2).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i2

Hardjaloka, Loura. (2015). Kepailitan Lintas Batas Perspektif Hukum Internasional dan Perbandingannya Dengan Instrumen Nasional di Beberapa Negara. Surabaya: Jurnal Yuridika, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, 30(3).

Jacobs, Wenette. (2010). The third-party plaintiff's exceptional direct claim against the insured defendant's liability insurer: Some lessons to be learnt from the third parties (rights against insurers) act 2010 in english law. South African Mercantile Law Journal, 22(4).

Nicoll, Chris. (2016). Third Party Rights Against Insurers: Time for Another Look?. New Zealand Business Law Quarterly, 22.

Nola, Luthvi Febryka. (2017). Kedudukan Konsumen Dalam Kepailitan. Jakarta: Jurnal DPR RI, 8(2).

Nugroho, Aditya Aryo and Djuwityastuti. (2019). Klaim Asuransi Sebagai Dasar Adanya Utang Dalam Permohonan Kepailitan Perusahaan Asuransi (Studi Kasus: Putusan Nomor 408 K/Pdt-Pailit/2015). Surakarta: Jurnal Privat Law, 7(2).

Prayogo, Sedyo. (2016). Penerapan Batas-Batas Wanprestasi dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Perjanjian. Semarang: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 3(2).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v3i2.1453

Prihatmaka, Hervana Wahyu, Sunarmi, Rahmad Hendra. (2014). Insolvensi dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia (Studi Putusan No. 48/ Pailit/2012/Pn.Niaga.Jkt.Pst antara PT. Telekomunikasi Selular vs PT. Primajaya Informatika). Lampung: Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no2.295

Seife, Howard. (2002). Insurance proceeds in bankruptcy. Banking Law Journal, 119(8)

Surjanto, Diana. (2018). Urgensi Pengaturan Syarat Insolvensi Dalam Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Denpasar: Acta Comitas Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 3(2).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i02

Yudho, Wibisono Adithyo. (2017). Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Sebagai Sumber Utang Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Madura: Rechtidee, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, 12(2).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v12i2.3339

Others

Boom, W.V. (2020). Comparative Insurance Law. Unpublished manuscript, International Tort and International Insurance Law course, Leiden University, Netherlands.

National Law Development Agency. (2017). Academic Draft of Bill of Law regarding the Amendment to Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debts. Jakarta: National Law Development Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.1954

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Ius Constituendum



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Jurnal Ius Constituendum :  Journal Law by Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.