Implementasi Tenggang Waktu Pengajuan Perceraian Menurut Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Di Indonesia

Medina Ratu Rahma Pasaribu, Muhammad Yusuf Siregar, Wahyu Simon Tampubolon

Abstract


This research aims to examine the reasons the Panel of Judges granted divorce in the Rantau Prapat Religious Court Decision No.1473/PDT.G/2023/PA.RAP. SEMA (Supreme Court Circular Letter) is a circular from the leadership of the Supreme Court for the judiciary containing education on the implementation of justice in a more administrative manner. PP (Government Regulation) Number 9 of 1975 does not explain the time for a dispute before the court recognizes the reason for divorce.. In this case, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for divorce on the grounds that continuous disputes, (domestic violence) domestic violence and the defendant using drugs. The Plaintiff and Defendant have not lived apart for six months, but in SEMA Number 1 of 2022 there is a provision that divorce on the grounds of continuous disputes and quarrels can be granted if it is proven that the husband and wife have had continuous disputes and quarrels or have lived apart for at least six months. The panel of judges granted the lawsuit because they had not lived apart for six months, so further study was needed regarding the reasons for granting the lawsuit. The research uses normative juridical methods by exploring theories, concepts and legislation related to this research. The results of the research showed that the Panel of Judges granted divorce cases that had not reached the minimum requirement of being separated for six months if conditions in the household did not allow it to continue because it could be dangerous. In this case, considering the sake of justice and the aim of the law, namely maintaining the honor or safety of oneself and life, the provisions in SEMA Number 1 of 2022 can be set aside.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji alasan Majelis Hakim mengabulkan perceraian pada Putusan Pengadilan Agama Rantau Prapat No.1473/PDT.G/2023/PA.RAP. SEMA (Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung) yaitu edaran pimpinan Mahkamah Agung untuk peradilan berisi edukasi pelaksanaan peradilan yang lebih administratif. PP (Peraturan Pemerintah) Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 tidak menjelaskan waktu perselisihan sebelum pengadilan mengakui alasan perceraian. Dalam perkara ini, Penggugat mengajukan gugatan perceraian dengan alasan perselisihan terus menerus, (KDRT) Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga dan Tergugat menggunakan Narkoba. Penggugat dan Tergugat belum enam bulan pisah tempat tinggal, namun dalam SEMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 terdapat ketentuan perceraian dengan alasan perselisihan dan pertengkaran terus menerus dapat dikabulkan apabila terbukti suami istri berselisih dan bertengkar terus menerus atau telah berpisah tempat tinggal selama minimal enam bulan. Majelis hakim mengabulkan gugatan dimana mereka belum sampai enam bulan pisah tempat tinggal sehingga perlu adanya kajian lebih jauh mengenai alasan dikabulkannya gugatan. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan cara mendalami teori, konsep, perundang-undangan yang berhubungan dengan penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Majelis Hakim mengabulkan perkara perceraian yang belum sampai unsur minimal pisah rumah selama enam bulan apabila kondisi dalam rumah tangga tersebut tidak memungkinkan untuk dilanjutkan karena dapat membahayakan. Dalam perkara ini, mengingat demi keadilan serta tujuan hukum yaitu memelihara kehormatan atau keselamatan diri maupun jiwa, sehingga ketentuan pada SEMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tersebut dapat dikesampingkan.


 


Keywords


Divorce; Dispute; Lawsuit; Panel of Judges; Gugatan; Majelis Hakim; Perceraian; Perselisihan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Almesemari, Abdelfattah. “Divorce: Background, Impact On Children And Suggestion To Lessen Damage.” American Journal Of Society And Law 1, No. 1 (2022): 39–42. Https://Doi.Org/10.54536/Ajsl.V1i1.768.

Asni, Asni. “Putusan Serta Merta Dalam Perkara Hadhanah Di Pengadilan Agama Dalam Rangka Perlindungan Anak.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 15, No. 1 (2021): 67–82. Https://Doi.Org/10.24090/Mnh.V15i1.4115.

Aulia, Mohamad Faisal. “Analisis Perbandingan Penerapan Hukum Keluarga Di Mesir Dan Di Indonesia.” Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Peradilan Islam 2, No. 2 (2022): 123–32. Https://Doi.Org/10.15575/As.V2i2.14327.

Ayu, Hanuring, And Paramitha Setia Anggraeny. “Kasus Gloria E Mairering Perkara Kewarganegaraan Ganda Dalam Perkawinan Campuran.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 4, No. 1 (2019): 1. Https://Doi.Org/10.26623/Jic.V4i1.1530.

Bambang Sunggono. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016.

Bernadeth, P De Guzman. “Implementation Of RA 9262 Otherwise Known As Anti-Violence Against Women And Children.” American Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research And Innovation 2, No. 6 (2023): 21–26. Https://Doi.Org/10.54536/Ajmri.V2i6.2067.

Dahwadin, Dahwadin, Enceng Iip Syaripudin, Eva Sofiawati, And Muhamad Dani Somantri. “Hakikat Perceraian Berdasarkan Ketentuan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia.” Yudisia : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 11, No. 1 (2020): 87. Https://Doi.Org/10.21043/Yudisia.V11i1.3622.

Daniel, Rio, Toriq Fernanda, And Astika Nurul Hidayah. “Analisis Perceraian Akibat Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Di Pengadilan Agama Purwokerto ( Studi Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 1022 / Pdt . G / 2021 / PA . Pwt )” 17, No. 01 (2024): 12–20. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.59582/Sh.V17i01.852.

Djanius Djamin Dan Syamsul Arifin. Bahan Dasar Hukum Perdata. Sekolah Ti. Medan, 1997.

Elmayanti. “Peranan Hakim Dalam Melakukan Penegakan Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bina Bangsa 4, No. 1 (2024): 238–52. Https://Doi.Org/Doi Artikel:10.46306/Rj.V4i1.116.

Fauziah, Atika Suri Nur, Aziizah Nur Fauzi, And Umma Ainayah. “Analisis Maraknya Perceraian Pada Masa Covid 19.” Mizan: Journal Of Islamic Law 4, No. 2 (2020): 181–92. Https://Doi.Org/10.32507/Mizan.V4i2.838.

Hasanah, Uswatun. “Pengaruh Perceraian Orangtua Bagi Psikologis Anakhasanah, Uswatun. ‘Pengaruh Perceraian Orangtua Bagi Psikologis Anak’ (2019).” Analisis Gender Dan Agama 2, No. 1 (2021): 19–24. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.31958/Agenda.V2i1.1983.

Hendra, Pertaminawati, And Sheila Hauna Arifa. “Studi Fiqh Perceraian Dalam Demografi Wilayah.” Misykat Al-Anwar Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Masyarakat 7, No. 1 (2024): 1–10. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.24853/Ma.7.1.39-48.

Herman, Oheo Kaimuddin Haris, Sabrina Hidayat, Handrawan, Safril Sofwan Sanib, And Yuri Stiadi. “Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Raha Nomor 178/PID.B/2017/PN Rah Tentang Prinsip Ultra Petita.” Halu Oleo Legal Research 5, No. 2 (2023): 501–13. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.33772/Holresch.V5i2.516.

Heryanti, Rini. “Implementasi Perubahan Kebijakan Batas Usia Perkawinan.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 6, No. 1 (2021): 120. Https://Doi.Org/10.26623/Jic.V6i1.3190.

Manna, Nibras Syafriani, Shinta Doriza, And Maya Oktaviani. “Cerai Gugat: Telaah Penyebab Perceraian Pada Keluarga Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia Seri Humaniora 6, No. 1 (2021): 11. Https://Doi.Org/10.36722/Sh.V6i1.443.

Mardi, Oxsis, And Fatmariza Fatmariza. “Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Keterabaian Hak-Hak Abstrak Factor Causing Impossibility Of The Right Of The Post-Direction Children.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 6, No. April 2021 (2017): 182–99. Https://Doi.Org/Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.26623/Jic.V6i1.3282.

Marwa, Muhammad Habibi Miftakhul. “Model Penyelesaian Perselisihan Perkawinan Perspektif Hukum Adat Dan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal USM Law Review 4, No. 2 (2021): 777. Https://Doi.Org/10.26623/Julr.V4i2.4059.

Maulidya, Ghoniyah Zulindah, Syahdila Nur Rahmawati, Vina Rahmawati, And Alifian Fahdzan Mardany. “Ratio Decidendi Putusan, Jenis-Jenis Putusan Dan Upaya Hukum Terhadap Putusan Yang Telah Memiliki Kekuatan Hukum Tetap Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Acara Pidana Di Indonesia.” HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum 3, No. 1 (2023): 211–30. Https://Doi.Org/10.35316/Hukmy.2023.V3i1.211-230.

Nasir, Melisa, Elmi Khoiriyah, Bagus Priyono Pamungkas, Inas Hardianti, And Raesitha Zildjianda. “Kedudukan Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan Di Indonesia.” Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, No. 1 (2023): 241–54. Https://Doi.Org/10.37680/Almanhaj.V5i1.2084.

Ramdani, Riyan, And Firda Nisa Syafitri. “Penentuan Besaran Nafkah Madhiyah, Nafkah Iddah Dan Mut’Ah Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama.” ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan 15, No. 1 (2021): 37–50. Https://Doi.Org/10.15575/Adliya.V15i1.11874.

Rasyid, Wildan Zulfikar. “Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam Żarī ’ Ah Implementation Of Sema Number 1 Year 2022 On The Granting Of Divorce Suits From The Perspective Of Sadd Al- Żarī ’ Ah Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam” 5, No. 1 (2024): 21–37. Https://Doi.Org/10.36701/Bustanul.V5i1.1297.Pendahuluan.

Septiandani, Dian, Ani Triwati, And Efi Yulistyowati. “Kemaslahatan Dalam Perkawinan Poligami Dalam Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Indonesia.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 8, No. 3 (2023): 466. Https://Doi.Org/10.26623/Jic.V8i3.7236.

Setiawan, Danie. “Hak Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Menetapkan Kewajiban Suami Terhadap Isteri Dalam Perkara Cerai Talak.” University Of Bengkulu Law Journal 7, No. 1 (2022): 45–53. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.33369/Ubelaj.7.1.45-53.

Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: PT Intermasa, 2003.

Talli, Abdul Halim, Andi Akram, Ashar Sinelele, Dahlan Dahlan, And Lukman Hakim. “Application Of The Principle Of Truth To Judiciary Institutions: Discourse Of Judges At The Makassar Religious High Court, Indonesia.” Samarah 7, No. 1 (2023): 302–20. Https://Doi.Org/10.22373/Sjhk.V7i1.14865.

Undang-Undang No 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Komputer, N.D.

Utami, Safira Maharani Putri, And Siti Nurul Intan Sari Dalimunthe. “Penerapan Teori Keadilan Terhadap Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian.” Jurnal USM Law Review 6, No. 1 (2023): 433. Https://Doi.Org/10.26623/Julr.V6i1.6899.

Wafi, Abdul, And Shofiatul Jannah. “The Rising Trend Of Divorce Cases : Social And Psychological Implications In Modern Society.” Ius Constituendum 9, No. 1 (2024): 1–12. Https://Doi.Org/Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.26623/Jic.V9i1.8157.

Widia Aprilia, Lika Apreasta, Dian Estu. P. “Innovative : Volume 1 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Research & Learning In Primary Education.” Innovative 1, No. 2 (2021): 552–60. Https://Doi.Org/Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.31004/Innovative.V1i2.2089.

Yunanto. Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2010.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9372

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal USM LAW REVIEW : Journal Law published by Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.