Criminal Law Reform In Criminal Responsibility For People In Mental Disorders Oriented To Dignified Justice

Dave David Tedjokusumo, Carissa Amanda Siswanto

Abstract


This article aims to analyze the nature of criminal responsibility and criminal law reform in ODGJ criminal responsibility which is oriented towards the theory of dignified justice. The urgency of this study is that the application of the formulation of offenses in the provisions of Article 44 of the WvS Criminal Code is not appropriate for perpetrators of criminal acts who are malingering, lack of legal protection to victims. Therefore, a reform of criminal law is needed. In the preparation of this research using normative juridical legal research methods carried out through literature review as the basic material for analysis. The result of the discussion of this study is that the reform of criminal law, especially in ODGJ criminal liability which has been regulated in Article 38 juncto Article 39 of the National Criminal Code, where the rule of law is more appropriate, and has been oriented towards the theory of dignified justice. In addition, it is also necessary to pay attention to the role of relevant law enforcement officials such as the Police and Hospitals which in this case issue Visum et Repertum (VeR), because correct law enforcement is also needed from law enforcement officials.


Keywords


Criminal Law Reform; ODGJ Criminal Liability; Dignified Justice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anchori, Yusup. “Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa (ODGJ) Dihubungkan Dengan Tujuan Negara Hukum Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Syntax Administration 1, no. 8 (2020): 1183–1200. https://jurnalsyntaxadmiration.com/index.php/jurnal/article/download/143/238.

Atmasasmita, Romli. Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan: Geen Straft Zonder Schuld. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2017.

Bubna, Sristi. “Case Anlysis: R v McNaughton (1843) 8 E. R. 718.” The Journal of Unique Laws and Students 1, no. 3 (2021): 288–93. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.59126/v1i3a21.

Butar-Butar, Andreas. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana ASN Yang Dengan Sengaja Melakukan Tindak Kekerasan Yang Manghalang-Halangi Penyelenggara Pemilu Dalam Pelaksanaan Tugasnya Di Tempat Pemungutan Suara (Putusan Nomor 1238/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Makassar).” Universitas HKBP Nommensen, 2020. http://repository.uhn.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/4394/Andreas Butar-Butar.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Cahyani, Ni Putu Mega, I Nyoman Sujana, and Made Minggu Widiantara. “Visum et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 3, no. 1 (2021): 122–28. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.3.1.2021.122-128.

Hidayatulloh, Irvan. “Konsep Penjatuhan Sanksi Bagi Pelaku Eksibisionisme Dalam Perspektif Nilai Keadilan.” Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, 2021. http://repository.untag-sby.ac.id/10319/.

Ismail, Muhammad Wirasto. “Perlindungan Hukum Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa (ODGJ) Di Rumah Sakit Khusus Jiwa.” Wal’afiat Hospital Journal 1, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.33096/whj.v1i1.22.

Manurung, Anju Trifosa. “Tinjauan Terhadap Kekuatan Alat Bukti Visum Et Repertum Dalam Kasus Penganiayaan (Studi Kasus Perkara No: 384/Pid.B/2020/PN Dum).” Universitas Islam Riau, 2022. https://repository.uir.ac.id/14656/1/171010549.pdf.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2017.

Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian, and Andika Putra Eskanugraha. “Refleksi Asas Kemanfaatan: Mengilhami Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Tiada Kesalahan Tanpa Kemanfaatan.” Puskapsi Law Review 3, no. 1 (2023): 121–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19184/puskapsi.v3i1.40295.

Prasetyo, Teguh. Keadilan Bermartabat Perspektif Teori Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2015.

Prasetyo, Teguh, and Abdul Halim Barakatullah. Ilmu Hukum Dan Filsafat Hukum, Studi Pemikiran Ahli Hukum Sepanjang Zaman. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas, 2007.

Resky. “Penerapan Pasal 44 KUHP Tentang Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Yang Dijadikan Alasan Pemaaf Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kepada Pemuka Agama.” Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Muhammadiyah Sinjai, 2022. http://repository.uiad.ac.id/id/eprint/843/1/Skripsi Resky.pdf.

Rizqiqa, Larasati Dwi, and Budi Arta Atmaja. “Penentuan Mens Rea Dalam Unsur Perencanaan Pada Perkara Penganiayaan Pasal 353 Ayat 2 KUHP.” Jurnal Belo 6, no. 2 (2021): 126–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol6issue2page126-147.

Suriani Suriani, Dany Try Hutama Hutabarat, Irma Sari. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dengan Gangguan Jiwa (Study Pengadilan Negeri Kisaran).” Citra Justicia : Majalah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat 23, no. 2 (2022): 54–63. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.36294/cj.v23i2.2621.

Widiatama, Widiatama, Hadi Mahmud, and Suparwi Suparwi. “Ideologi Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Membangun Negara Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal USM Law Review 3, no. 2 (2020): 310. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i2.2774.

Wiyanto, Roni. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2012.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7928

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal USM LAW REVIEW : Journal Law published by Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.