Akibat Hukum Atas Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Yang Tidak Dibacakan oleh Notaris/PPAT Dihadapan Para Pihak
Abstract
This study aims to explore and assess the legal effects resulting from the execution of the sale and purchase deed that has been made by a Notary/PPAT but is not read out in front of the parties concerned. The research used by the researcher is a research that has a descriptive nature based on several literature sources such as books, research results, journals and research articles. In this study, it is explained that the Notary/PPAT has the responsibility to read out the results of the deed that he has made before the parties. The result is the degradation of the value ofThe Notary/PPAT plays a vital role in confirming the authenticity of the deed of sale and purchase. Formally, a deed whose contents are not read out to related parties, this deed will be equated with an underhand deed. The deed's validity in relation to the sale and purchase content is intact, but it is important to consider other relevant factors, if it is seen from the authenticity value, this deed is flawed and degraded. Therefore, the Notary/PPAT who commits this mistake will be given a sanction in accordance with the applicable code of ethics for the violations and omissions he has committed.
Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk melakukan pengkajian serta analisa akibat hukum dari akta jual beli yang telah disusun oleh Notaris/PPAT akan tetapi tidak dibacakan didepan para pihak yang bersangkutan. Riset yang eipakai oleh penulisan ini ialah riset yang memiliki karakter deskripftif yang berlandaskan atas sejumlah sumber literatur semacam buku, hasil riset, jurnal dan artikel riset. Dalam riset ini diberi penjelasan bahwa Notaris/PPAT mempunyai tanggung jawab untuk membacakan hasil dari akta yang telah dibuatnya dihadapan pada pihak. Akibat yang ditimbulkan adalah terdegradasinya nilai dari keontetikan dari akta jual beli yang telah disusun oleh Notaris/PPAT. Melalui cara formal, sebuah akta yang tidak dibacakan isisnya kepada pihak terkait, akta ini akan disamakan dengan akta dibawah tangan. Meskipun akta yang dibuat ini tetap sah secara isi jual beli namun jika dilihat dari nilai keontentikannya akta ini sudah cacat dan terdegradasi. Oleh karena itu Notaris/PPAT yang melakukan kesalahan ini akan diberikan sanksi sesuai dengan kode etik yang berlaku atas pelanggaran dan kelalaian yang dilakukannya.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
(IPCC), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. “Summary for Policymakers.” In Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis, 1–30. Cambridge University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Afriana, Anita. “Kedudukan Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Sebagai Pihak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Indonesia Terkait Akta Yang Dibuatnya,” n.d. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.
Almansyah, Dimas, and Mohamad Fajri Mekka Putra. “Tanggungjawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Para Pihak Di Bawah Tekanan Dan Paksaan.” Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 2 (2022): 754–66. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i2.5728.
Ayu Ningsih, Lisa, and Elviana Sagala. “Responsibilities of Land Deed Officers (PPAT) For Selling Buying Deed,” n.d. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.5995.
Ayuningtyas, Pratiwi. “Sanksi Terhadap Notaris Dalam Melanggar Kode Etik.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan 9, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v9i2.637.
Eka Putri, Citra, and Radja Erland Hamzah. “Analisis Fenomena Penipuan Identitas Diri (Catfishing) Pada Literasi Digital Pengguna Media Sosial” 3, no. 2 (2022): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.55122/kom57.v3i2.520.
Fauziah, Fenty. “Organum: Jurnal Saintifik Manajemen Dan Akuntansi,” 2021. https://doi.org/10.35138/organu.
Haryati, Sri, Sukarno Sukarno, and Sugeng Purwanto. “Implementation of Online Education during the Global Covid-19 Pandemic: Prospects and Challenges.” Cakrawala Pendidikan 40, no. 3 (October 2021): 604–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i3.42646.
Iryadi, Irfan, Teuku Syahrul Ansari, Jumadil Saputra, Teuku Afrizal, and Ahmad Syauqi Thirafi. “The Role Of Jurisprudence As Form Of Legal Prescriptions: A Case Study Of Notaries In Indonesia.” WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development 17 (2021): 75–80. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2021.17.8.
Iskhak, Irfan, Hengki Irawan, and Aryani Witasari. “Roles and Responsibilities of Notary in Deed Making Agreement on Sale and Purchase Agreement When the Parties Dispute,” n.d.
Kumara Putra, Fani Martiawan. “Characteristics of Notary Deeds for Transactions Through Electronic Media.” Norma 17, no. 3 (January 2021): 1. https://doi.org/10.30742/nlj.v17i3.1091.
Liguna, Melissa, Budi Santoso, and FX Joko Priyono. “Notaries Ethics in Stipulating Honorarium Minimum in Indonesia.” International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) 8, no. 4 (November 2019): 5381–85. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D7596.118419.
Mandela, Sonya Praminda Yona, Ismansyah Ismansyah, and Azmi Fendri. “Legal Protection of Notaries Related to Living Certificate of Binding Agreement.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 6, no. 3 (July 2019): 597. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.880.
Nabila, Kholida, Muhammad Sofyan Pulungan, and Isyana Wisnuwardhani Sadjarwo. “Court Decision to Replace the Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land in the Agreement and Switch of Cessie Rights.” Substantive Justice International Journal of Law 4, no. 2 (December 2021): 134. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v4i2.156.
Pasaribu, Puspa, and Eva Achjani Zulfa. “Akibat Hukum Identitas Palsu Dalam Akta PerjanjianKredit Yang Melibatkan Pihak Ketiga Pemberi Jaminan.” Jurnal USM Law Review 4, no. 2 (2021): 535–46. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i2.4050.
Pramono, Ardhiya Ega, Azharuddin Heriyanti, Willy Tanjaya, and Elvira Fitriyani Pakpahan. “Responsibility of Notary for Unlawful Action in Annulment of Selling Authority.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 24 (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2017.v02.i02.p05.
Ramadhani, Puspita Putri, Hasbir Paserangi, and Wiwie Heryani. “Legal Certainty of the Deed of Agreement Made by a Notary Based on the Power to Sell (Case Study Case Number: 41/PDT.G/2016/PN.PA).” Indonesia Private Law Review 2, no. 2 (December 2021): 95–108. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v2i2.2319.
Ratnasari, N Dewi, Akhmad Khsni, and Amin Purnawan. “Legal Analysis of Notary.” Akhmad Khsni & Amin Purnawan.) Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (SANLaR) 3, no. 4 (2021): 1481–90.
Rijal Fadli, Muhammad. “Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif” 21, no. 1 (2021): 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.
Saptomo, Ade, and SihombingB. F. “Certificate of Land Rights in the Legal Philosophy of Notary.” International Journal of Scientific Research and Management 8, no. 12 (December 2020): 297–309. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v8i12.lla02.
Sinaga, Niru Anita. “Kode Etik Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Profesi Hukum Yang Baik.” Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 10, no. 2 (2020): 1–34.
Yulia, Aris, R. Benny Riyanto, and F. X. Joko Priyono. “The Role of Notary Public Honorary Council in the Enforcement of the Notary Code of Ethics in Indonesia.” In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 175. Institute of Physics Publishing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012172.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i2.6850
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal USM LAW REVIEW : Journal Law published by Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
