Perbandingan Konsep Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Di Beberapa Negara

Yati Nurhayati

Abstract


This study aims to dissect the concept of annulment of arbitral awards in several countries. Arbitration disputes are one of the options in resolving business disputes that are used in various countries in the world, one of which is Indonesia. Arbitration, both national and international, has a very important role in the business world which continues to develop, especially in the digital era. However, the arbitration award which has a final and binding nature still has a denial effort through the annulment of the award. In Indonesia, the provisions for the cancellation of arbitration are regulated in Article 70 of the Arbitration Law which has changed from the provisions before the birth of the Arbitration Law. This study uses a normative research method (comparative descriptive) which focuses on comparing the concept of annulment of arbitral awards in several countries in accordance with the laws and regulations in force in each country, not only discussing the rejection of the implementation of arbitral awards in comparison of two countries, the conditions for the cancellation of arbitral awards. national or international arbitral award. The results of the study showed that although arbitration applies in almost many countries, the provisions for the cancellation of arbitration awards in several countries are different.

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan membedah konsep pembatalan putusan arbitrase dibeberapa negara. Sengketa arbitrase menjadi salah satu pilihan dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis yang digunakan diberbagai negara di dunia salah satunya di Indonesia. Arbitrase baik nasional maupun internasional memiliki peran yang sangat penting dalam dunia bisnis yang terus mengalami perkembangan terutama di era digital. Namun putusan arbitrase yang memiliki sifat final dan binding pun tetap memiliki upaya penyangkalan melalui pembatalan putusan. Di Indonesia ketentuan pembatalan arbitrase diatur dalam Pasal 70 UU Arbitrase yang mengalami perubahan dari ketentuan sebelum lahirnya UU arbitrase. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif (deskriptif perbandingan) yang berfokus pada perbandingan konsep pembatalan putusan arbitrase di beberapa negara sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undanagn yang berlaku di tiap negara, tidaka hanya membahas tentang penolakan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase perbandingan dua negara saja, syarat pembatalan putusan arbitrase nasional atau pembatalan putusan arbitrase internasional. Hasil penelitian didapatkan bahwa meskipun arbitrase berlaku di hampir banyak negara namun ketentuan pembatalan putusan arbitrase dibeberapa negara berbeda-beda.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


Keywords


Arbitrase; Mekanisme; Membatalkan; Putusan Annulment; Arbitration; Award; Mechanism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agusman, Damos Dumoli. The Courts and Treaties: Indonesia s Perspective. Padjadjaran Journal of International Law 1, no. 1 (2017): 9.

Amarini, Indriati. Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Kosmik Hukum 19, no. 1 (2019): 76.

Azzarina, Annalisa Y, Muhammad Syaifuddin. Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Berasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal (LamLaj) 3, no. 1 (2018): 59.

Indonesia, Negara Republik. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang. Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial, Pub. L. No. 2 (2004).

Japan Arbitration Act, Pub. L. No. 138 (2003).

Mikazuki, Akira. Multi-Layered Structure in Dispute Resolution Criteria. Study of Civil Procedure Law Japanese, no. 9 (1984).

No Title. Accessed July 28, 2022. www.investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/IIA/CountryBits/190#IiaInner/Menu.

No Title. Accessed July 28, 2022. http://www.aprag.org/scripts/view.member.asp/recorded =376.

Nugroho, Ircham Suryo. Kewenangan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Dalam Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Di Janewa Swiss (Studi Kasus PT. Pertamina Dan PT. PLN Melawan Karaha Bodas Company). Lex Renaissance 5, no. 3 (2020): hlm. 539-557.

Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, I., Said, M.Y. Metodologi Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) 2, no. 1 (2021): hlm. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2iI.14.

Nurhayati, Yati. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2020.

Park, William W. The Interaction of Courts and Arbitration in England: The 1996 Act as a Model for the United States? International Arbitration Law Review, 1998, hlm. 54.

Raymond, H. Problematika Final Dan Mengikat Putusan Arbitrase Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 2 (2021): 55 68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v1i2.12672.

Samudra, Muhammad Mpu, and Ning Adiasih. Studi Perbandingan Hukum Terkait Ketentuan Penolakan Pelaksanaan Dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Di Indonesia Dengan Di Thailand. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 8, no. 1 (2022): 107. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v8i1.173.

Siregar, Taufik. Keberadaan Arbitrase Di Kota Medan. Mercatoria 11, no. 1 (2018): 26.

Situmorang, Mosgan. Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase (Annulment of Arbitration Awards). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum: De Jure 20, no. 4 (2021): 573 86.

€” €” €”. Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase (Annulment of Arbitration Awards). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum: De Jure 20, no. 4 (2020): hlm. 573-586.

Subekti. Arbitrase Perdagangan. Bandung: Bina Cipta, 1992.

Tabalujan, Benny S. Singapore Business Law. Second edi. Singapore: Business Law Asia, 2000.

Times, Hanrei. Osaka High Court 1431, no. 547 (n.d.): 108.

Tri Ariprabowo, dan R. NAzriyah. Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014 (The Nullifying of Arbitral Decision by Court in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-XII/2014). Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 4 (2017): 725.

Tweeddale, Karen Tweeddale dan Andrew. A Practical Appraoch to Arbitration Law. Blackstone Press, 1999.

Yuyut.dkk., Siwi W. Permohonan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Ditinjau Dari Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa (Analisis Putusan No.4/Pdt.Sus-Arb/2020/PN.Bna). Jurnal Lex Spesialis 1, no. 1 (2021): 69 75.

Zhou, Jian. Judicial Intervention In International Arbitration: A Comparative Study Of The Scope Of The New York Convention In U.S. And Chinese Courts, 2006.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i2.5700

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Ius Constituendum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Jurnal Ius Constituendum :  Journal Law by Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.