BRIBERY AND GRATUITY: REGULATORY ANALYSIS AND JUDICIAL RESPONSE

Ach. Tahir, Mahrus Ali, Muhammad Arif Setiawan

Abstract


This paper is aimed at analyzing the concepts and parameters to determine an act as a bribery and gratuity in the Anti-Corruption Law and court cases.  This involved the application of the doctrinal legal research to understand these differences. The results of this study showed that bribery requires a meeting of mind between the bribe givers and bribe recipients which is not found in gratuity. The reporting mechanism and the reversal burden of proof do not apply to bribery while Operation Catching Hand does not apply to gratuity due to its inability to satisfy the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Criminal sanctions are also imposed on both the giver and the recipient of a bribe while the act of a giver in gratuity is not considered as a criminal offense. The study also found that the court failed to apply these essential differences.


Keywords


Caught Hand; Meeting Of Mind; Report Mechanism

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Ali, Mahrus and Setya Bagus Yuherawan, Deni. Delik-delik Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.

Andarnuswari, Ninus D. (ed). Kajian Implementasi Pasal Gratifikasi dalam Putusan Pengadilan (Edisi Revisi), 2019, 51. https://aclc.kpk.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Buku-Kajian-Implementasi-Pasal-Gratifikasi-KPK2019-LowRes-08052020.pdf.

Arrieta, Lindsay. Attacking Bribery At Its Core: Shifting Focus To the Demand Side of the Bribery Equation. Public Contract Law Journal 45, no. 4 (2016): 587 612. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/pubclj45&id=614&div=&collection=.

Bethesda, Elisabeth. Masyarakat Memandang Gratifikasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 5, no. 2 (November 17, 2019): 62 75. https://doi.org/10.23887/JKH.V5I2.18311.

Budiman, Maman. Penerapan Pasal 5 Ayat (1) Huruf b Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial 13, no. 1 (September 7, 2020): 73 87. https://doi.org/10.29123/JY.V13I1.391.

Cahyana, Fariz. Urgensi Pengaturan Suap di Sektor Swasta Sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurist-Diction 3, no. 1 (January 29, 2020): 61. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i1.17623.

Chaffee, Eric C. From Legalized Business Ethics to International Trade Regulation: The Role of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Other Transnational Anti-Bribery Regulations in Fighting Corruption in International Trade. Mercer Law Review 1 (2016).https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mercer65&id=727&div=&collection=.

Chazawi, Adami. Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2016.

Fuhr, David M. Of Thieves and Repressors: The Interplay Between Corruption and Human Rights Violations. 5 Elon L. Rev. 271 5, no. 271 (2013): 1 29. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/elonlr5&id=279&div=&collection=.

Gerber, Marsha Z., and Elane L. Lawson. Business Entertainment Texas Style Here and Abroad What You Need to Know. Texas Bar Journal, 2012, 536.

Golonggom, Mohamad N., Berlian Manopo, and Attie Olii. Penegakan Tindak Pidana Suap Menurut Ketentuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Lex Crimen 10, no. 5 (April 7, 2021):120-130. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/33430.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cet. Pertama. Yogayakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.

Iskandar, Irvan S., and Teguh Kurniawan. Gratifikasi di Badan Usaha Milik Negara Berdasarkan Motif Kecurangan: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan 5, no. 2 (2020): 81 97. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v5i2.7690.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. KPK Annual Report 2018. Jakarta, 2018. https://www.kpk.go.id/images/Integrito/LaporanTahunanKPK/Laporan-Tahunan-KPK-2018-Bahasa-Inggris-Website.pdf.

€” €” €”. KPK Annual Report 2019. Jakarta, 2019. https://www.kpk.go.id/images/pdf/ Laporan-Tahunan-KPK-2019-Bahasa.pdf.

Lestari, Yeni Sri. Kartel Politik dan Korupsi Politik di Indonesia. Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal) 12, no. 1 (June 2, 2017): 67 75. https://doi.org/10.15294/PANDECTA.V12I1.7820.

Low, Lucinda A., Sarah R. Lamoree, and John London. The Demand Side of Transnational Bribery and Corruption: Why Leveling the Playing Field on the Supply Side Isn t Enough. In Fordham Law Review, 84:563 99, 2015. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/flr84&id=581&div=&collection=.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 1219 K/Pid.Sus/2018 (2018).

€” €” €”. Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 2933 K/ Pid.Sus/2018 (2018).

€” €” €”. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bengkulu Nomor 45/Pid.Sus-TPK/2017/PN BGL (2017).

€” €” €”. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor: 123/Pid.Sus-TPK/2017/PN Jkt.Pst (2017).

Mauliddar, Nur, Mohd Din, and Yanis Rinaldi. Gratifikasi Sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait Adanya Laporan Penerima Gratifikasi. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 19, no. 1 (2017): 155 173. http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/kanun.

Mulyanto. Praktik Pembatasan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian dalam Pengadilan Tipikor (Studi Pada Perkara Korupsi RAPBD Kota Semarang di Pengadilan Tipikor Kota Semarang). Jurnal Jurisprudence 6, no. 2 (2017): 116. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v6i2.3009.

Ndikumana, L ©once. The Private Sector as Culprit and Victim of Corruption in Africa. PERI Working Paper, (2013), 46.

N ¹ ±ez, Adalgiza A. International Business, Bribery, and Criminal Liability. New Jersey Lawyer, (2014), 65.

Oktavianto, Rizky, and Norin M. R. Abheseka. Evaluasi Operasi Tangkap Tangan KPK. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 5, no. 2 (December 30, 2019): 117 131. https://doi.org/10.32697/INTEGRITAS.V5I2.473.

Remmelink, Jan. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003.

Ridwan. Diskresi dan Tanggung Jawab Pemerintahan. Yogayakarta: FH UII Pers, 2014.

Romeo, Anto, and Deny Haspada. Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Suap Aktif dan Suap Pasif Bagi Pejabat Negara Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Iustitia Omnibus (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum) 2, no. 1 (June 11, 2021): 1 13. http://journal.unla.ac.id/index.php/iustitia/article/view/1745.

Rusadi, Fry Anditya R. P., Sukinta, and Bambang D. Baskoro. Penetapan Gratifikasi sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Pembuktiannya Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Diponegoro Law Journal 8, no. 2 (2019): 1145 1165. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/25460/22729.

Setiadi Wicipto. Korupsi di Indonesia Penyebab, Hambatan, Solusi dan Regulasi. Legislasi Indonesia 15, no. 3 (2018): 249 262. https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/234.

Spahn, Elizabeth K. Implementing Global Anti-Bribery Norms: From the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act to the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention to the U.N. Convention Against Corruption. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 23, no. 1 (2013): 1 34. https://doi.org/10.18060/17871.

Stuntz, William J. The Pathological Politics of Criminal Law. Michigan Law Review 100, no. 3 (2001): 505 598. https://doi.org/10.2307/1290411.

Syahroni, Muh. Arief, M. Alpian, and Syofyan Hadi. Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 2 (July 11, 2019): 124 133. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i2.2478.

Trautman, Lawrence J., and Altenbaumer-Price Kara. Lawyers, Guns and Money the Bribery Problem and U.K. Bribery Act 2010. SSRN Electronic Journal 47 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2276738.

Wiriadinata, Wahyu. Korupsi dan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 43, no. 1 (2017): 117. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol43.no1.1508.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v6i2.4093

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Ius Constituendum



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Jurnal Ius Constituendum :  Journal Law by Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.