Yuli Indrawati Implications of State Position Dualism on the Financial Settlement of PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i1.11395Keywords:
Bankrupt, PT Garuda Indonesia, State RoleAbstract
This study raises the issue of the implications of the dualism of the state's position as a public authority and shareholder in the financial settlement of PT Garuda Indonesia without injuring the intended use of APBN. The financial problems of PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. is already on the verge of requiring immediate action from the state. The focus of this research on the dualism of the state's position has never been discussed in previous research, even though this position is a determining element for the government's actions regarding the Garuda problem. The position of the state itself as the highest public authority and shareholder limits the state's actions to overcome the problems of PT Garuda Indonesia. This is based on the limitation of the use of the state budget (APBN) as regulated in the Constitution, which is only intended for the prosperity of the people. To answer the research problem, the regulations, the theory of legal entities, the public choice theory, the theory of state responsibility, and the international practices are used as analytical tools. The result of the analysis is that the efforts made by the state, both as a public authority and as a shareholder, must be based on considerations of benefits for the interests of the people – not based on mere nostalgia. Learning from the history of Garuda's management governance which has never improved significantly, the Government should not need to help Garuda because it will only waste the APBN and not be beneficial to the community, because the most important benefit is in deciding on APBN spending actions. Actions to increase capital can be carried out as long as it is believed that with the addition of capital, PT Garuda Indonesia can bounce back from adversity and generate sufficient profits to provide dividends to the state. If indeed the condition of PT Garuda Indonesia it is not possible to get up and operate so as to generate dividends, preferably PT Garuda Indonesia bankrupt.
References
Abdulkadir, Muhammad. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2010.
Afdal, Zikri. Analisis Yuridis Kepailitan BUMN Persero Dikaitkan Dengan Prinsip Perlindungan Hak-Hak Kreditur. JOM Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau Vol. VII No. 1 (Januari-Juni 2020): 1-15.
Ali, Chidir. Badan Hukum, Bandung: Alumni, 1999.
Andi R, R Ferdian. Gerakan Politik Anggaran Pro Rakyat Di Parlemen. Change, 2014.
Anggoro, Teddy. Transformasi Asas Publisitas Kepailitan dan PKPU untuk Penurunan Biaya Kepailitan dan Kemudahan Akses Informasi dalam Mendukung Pemulihan Ekonomi Indonesia, Jurnal Rechtsvinding Vol. 10 No. 3 (Desember 2021): 479-497.
Arifardhani, Yoyo. “No TitleKemandirian Badan Usaha Milik Negara: Persinggungan Antara Hukum Privat Dan Hukum Publik.” Otentik’s: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 1, no. 1 (2019): 54–72.
Ariffin, Tb. Boy B. “No TitleMeningkatkan Peranan Perusahaan BUMN Yang Sudah Go Publik Dalam Mengoptimalkan Pengelolaan Bisnis Berbasis Budaya Dan Kepastian Hukum.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 02, no. 01 (2023): 36–43. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.24967/ jaeap.v2i01.2079.
Ashidiqie, Jimly. “Memperkenalkan Gagasan Konstitusi Ekonomi.” Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti, 2012.
Avianti Widyastuti, Gugus Irianto, M. Achsin. “Privatisasi: Kinerja Keuangan Dan Distribusi Laba (Analisis Kritis Pada PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk.).” Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan 5, no. 1 (2015): 695–704.
Buchanan, James M. “The Constitution of Economic Policy,” 1986. http://nobelprizes.com/nobel/economics/1986a.html.
“Daftar BUMN Yang Punya Utang Jumbo Dan Menumpuk.” Jakarta. Accessed June 2, 2022. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20211216074242-92-734683/daftar-bumn-yang-punya-utang-jumbo-dan-menumpuk.
“Daftar Negara Tak Punya Flag Carrier.” Accessed June 2, 2022. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20211111141943-92-719770/daftar-negara-tak-punya-flag-carrier.
Dinarjito, Agus. “Penyertaan Modal Negara Pertumbuhan Aset Dan Kinerja Badan Usaha Milik Negara.” E-Jurnal Akuntansi 28, no. 2 (2019): 1323–45. https://doi.org/HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.24843/eja.2019.V28.I02.P20.
HS, Salim. Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, n.d.
Ikhsan, Vijey Hamdani Yusuf. “Analisis Efektivitas Penyertaan Modal Negara (PMN) Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan PT Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk.” Jurnal Indonesia Rich 2, no. 2 (2021): 25.
Inda Rahadiyan. “No TitleKedudukan BUMN Persero Sebagai Separate Legal Entity Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pemisahan Keuangan Negara Pada Permodalan BUMN.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 20, no. 4 (2013): 624–40.
Kartohadiprodjo, Soediman. “Negara Republik Indonesia Negara Hukum.” Jakarta, n.d.
Kompas.com. “Garuda Indonesia Krisis Akankah Nasib Garuda Indonesia Sama Seperti Merpati Airlines?No Title.” Accessed June 2, 2022. https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/06/03/150000526/akankah-nasib-garuda-indonesia-sama-seperti-merpati-airlines?page=all.
Kurniawan, M. Beni. “No TitleRedefinisi Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Kasus Kepailitan PT Istaka Karya Ditinjau Dari Three Keywords Theory.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 11, no. 3 (2017): 249–61.
“No Title.” Accessed June 2, 2022. www.garuda-indonesia.com.
OECD (2015). Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises, 2015 Edition. https://www.oecd.org/corporate/guidelines-on-corporate-governance-of-state-owned- enterprises.htm. Pages: 17-27. Acessed 16 October 2022.
OECD (2021). Ownership and Governance of State-Owned Enterprises: A Compendium of National Practices 2021: 36-37. https://www.oecd.org/corporate/ownership-and-governance-of-state-owned-enterprises-a-compendiumof-national-practices.htm. Acessed 16 October 2022.
Osborne, David. Gaebler, Ted. Reinventing Goverment. Penguin Group, 1993.
Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Surabaya nomor: 5/Pdt.Sus-Pembatalan Perdamaian/2022/PN.Niaga.Sby jo Nomor: 4/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2018/PN.Niaga.Sby. Acessed 2 June 2022.
Priangga, Rizal Widiya. Analisis Yuridis Sita Umum Asset BUMN Terhadap UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perbendaharaan Negara, Privat Law Vol. V No. 1 (Januari-Juni 2017): 124-130.
Rahadiyan, Inda. “Kedudukan BUMN Persero sebagai Separate Legal Entity dalam Kaitannya dengan Pemisahan Keuangan Negara pada Permodalan BUMN.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Vol. 20, No. 4 (Oktober 2013): 624-640.
Rajagukguk, Erman, Pengertian Keuangan Negara, makalah disampaikan pada Diskusi Publik “Pengertian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi” Komisi Hukum Nasional (KHN) RI, Jakarta 26 Juli 2006.
Sembiring, Sentosa. Hukum Perusahaan dalam Perundang-undangan. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2006.
“Siapa Pemegang Saham Garuda Indonesia,” 2021. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/12/09/siapa-pemegang-saham-garuda-indonesia.
Simatupang, Dian Puji N. Paradoks Rasionalitas Perluasan Ruang Lingkup Keuangan Negara Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit FHUI, 2011.
Sinaga, Niru Anita dan Nunuk Sulirudatin. Hukum Kepailitan Dan Permasalahannya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma Vol 7 No. 1 (September 2016): 158-173.
Sinn, Sijbren Cnossen and Hans-Werner, ed. Publik Finance and Public Policy In The New Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press, 2003.
Soekardono, R. Hukum Dagang, jilid I, Jakarta: Dian Rakyat, 1993.
Sukarna Wiranta. “No TitlePrivatisasi BUMN Dan Perannya Terhadap Pembangunan Ekonomi Nasional: Kasus PT. Garuda.” Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik 2, no. 1 (2011): 371–94.
Supramono, Gatot. Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Jakarta: PT. Penerbit Djambatan, 2008.
Suradi, Etty Susilowati dan Siti Mahmudah. Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Pernyataan Pailit Terhadap BUMN (Persero) (Studi pada Kepailitan PT Istaka Karya (Persero)). Diponegoro Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2016): 1-20.
Tanaya, Putu Edgar dan Kadek Agus Sudiarawan, Akibat Hukum Kepailitan BUMN Pasa Berlakunya UU Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 Tentang Keuangan negara. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Vol 3, No. 1 (Pebruari 2017): 117-126.
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 (n.d.).
Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara (2003).
Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2003 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara.
Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Administrasi Pemerintahan, Pub. L. No. 30 (2014).
Undang-Undang No. 86 Tahun 1958 tentang Nasionalisasi Perusahaan-Perusahaan Milik Belanda (n.d.).
Waluyo, Indarto. “No TitleMenyikapi Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Dan Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD) Yang Kurang Sehat.” Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia III, no. 1 (2004): 51–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v3i1.834.
Yunus, Yusnita, Muhammad Ichwan Musa, M. Ilham Wardana Haeruddin. “Analisis Tingkat Kebangkrutan PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk.” Jurnal Manajemen 1, no. 1 (2021): 10–11.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ius Constituendum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
