EFFECTIVENESS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT CASE BY THE CARTEL COMMISSION HONDA AND YAMAHA BASED ON JUSTICE PANCASILA

Otih Handayani, Juliana S. Ndolu, Achmad Jumeri Pamungkas, Douglas Napitupulu

Abstract


This research aims to reconstruct the effectiveness of law enforcement by the Commission in a cartel case Honda and Yamaha justice based on Pancasila. The first reaserch discuss about the effectiveness of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in law enforcement justice cartel cases Pancasila. Both reconstruct the article in Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Competition for law enforcement effectiveness. This research is a doctrinal approach of legislation and research . Study shows the first enforcement by the Commission is not operating effectively. The imposition of administrative sanctions from the Commission do not have permanent legal force, where they opened a space for parties reported to object to the level of the Supreme Court (MA). The process to obtain permanent legal force very long whereas 73% of MA won the Commission's decision. Both to achieve effective enforcement, it is necessary to expand the authority of the Commission, which sanctions the administration carried out by the Commission are final or not opened space object. Agae ensure the Commission's decision is fair, then there needs to be a power-sharing within the Commission to establish the field of internal controls.


Keywords


Effectiveness of Law Enforcementt; Competition; Justice Pancasila.

Full Text:

PDF

References


BOOKS

Bernard L Tanya., Simanjutak Yoan N., Hage Mark Y, the Legal Theory; Human tongue Trails Strategy and Generation Space, Matter to V, Genta Publishing 2013, Yogyakarta,

John Rawls's A Theory of Justice-Theory of Justice; Basic base- Political philosophy to Achieve Social Welfare Within the Community, Student Library, 2019, Yogyakarta,

Hikmanto Juwana, et al, Role of Judiciary In Dealing Case Competition. Partnership for Business Competition, 2003, Jakarta,

Lawrence M.Friedman. Legal System Perspective Social Science, Molds VIII, Nusa Media, 2017. Bandung

Mustafa Kamal Rokan, Competition Law Theory and Practice in Indonesia, the third Prints RajaGrafindo Persada, 2017, Depok

Soerjanto Puspo Ward, Philosophy Pancasila A Socio Cultural Approach, OESD, PT Gramedia, 1998, Jakarta .

JOURNALS

Alum Simbolon, Kedudukan Hukum Komisi Pengawas Persaiangan Usaha, Melaksanakan Wewenang Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Mimbar Hukum Vol 24 No 3, October 2012, Gadjahmada University, 2012, Yogyakarta, p. 539-540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16123

Apetriyas Zihaningrum, Penegakan Hukum Persekongkolan Tender Berdasarkan Undang- Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 199 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopili dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, Privat Law Jurnal Number 4 Volume 1 January- June 2016, Univesitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta,.

Banha Miguel Goncalo Coelho, "Smoke Without Fire; The Spanish Raw Tobacco Cartel Cases ", European Journal of Risk Regulation 2010.

Pure, "Economic Analysis Of Competition In Law No. 5 of 1999" Journal of Legal Clinics, Volume 6 No. 1, April 2002

Muhammad Alim Glance: "Justice Simple, Fast and Cost of Light", Varia Justice No. 305

Sidik Sunaryo, Dalam M. Usrin, Analisis Yuridis Asas Peradilan Sederhana Cepat dan Biaya Ringan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Jurnal SOLUSI, Volume 16 No 1, January 2018, Faculty of Law University of Palembang, p. 60-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v16i1.96

Murni, Analisis Ekonomi Terhadap Persaingan Usaha Dalam Undang- Undang.Nomor 5 Tahun 1999, Jurnal Arena Hukum, Volume 6 Nomor 1 April 2002. Faculty of Law, University of Brawijaya, 2002, Malang.

DOI https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2012.00501.3

Riski Dyas and Munawar Kholil, "Juridical Analysis Manurut Tender Conspiracy Law Enforcement Act Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Competition". Privat Law Journal Volume V, Number 2 July-December 2017. Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2017, Surakarta.

Rizal Aji Pratama, Pengaturan Monopoli Kartel oleh Pelaku Usaha Dalam Persaingan Usaha Garam; Suatu Kajian Putusan KPPU No. 10/KPPU/L/2005, Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 3 No. 2. 2018, Semarang, University, Semarang, p. 225. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v3i2.1041

CONSTITUTION

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945

Law No. 5 of 1999 on Antitrust and Unfair Competition

Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2019

Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2005

Case Number 04 / KPPU-1/2016 concerning the Commission's Decision

Case Number 217-K / Pdt.Sus-KPPU / 2019 of Cassation Decision

ARTICLE

Aldo Maulana Randa, Analisa Penegakan Hukum Persaiagan Usaha yang dilakukan oleh Komisi Persaiangan Usaha (KPPU) ditinjau dari Perbandingan Kewenangan Penegakan Hukum Persaiangan Usaha yang dilakukan oleh Federal Trade Commision di Amerika Serikat, Faculty of Law University of Indonesia, 2015, Jakarta

Muhammad Alim, Sekilas Tentang :Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan, Varia Peradilan Number 305, Mahkamah Agung, 2011, Jakarta.

INTERNET

https://beritagar.id/artikel/telatah/geliat-dan-prospek-industri-otomotif-nasional accessed on 22 November 2019 At 20:00

https: //www.aisi.or.id/statistic/ accessed on 22 November 2019 at 16.00 pm

http: //www.dpr.go.id/doksileg/proses1/RJ1-20170427-101602-9088.pdf accessed on 15 November 2019 At 17:00 pm




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.1980

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Ius Constituendum



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Jurnal Ius Constituendum :  Journal Law by Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.